Session Information
15 SES 09 A, Using Onenote as a Meta-tool across the Qualitative Research Process
Research Workshop
Contribution
From CAQDAS to Onenote - A tool to support the qualitative research process
As Paulus, Lester and Britt (2013) noted in their discourse analysis of introductory qualitative research textbooks, most authors limit their scope of digital tools to Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS). This "overriding focus on data analysis software, while important, has resulted in the exclusion of a broader discussion regarding the potential affordances and constraints of digital tools across the qualitative research process." (Paulus, Lester & Dempster, 2014, p. 2). But qualitative research processes go beyond just data analysis, as they can be read as a set of activities such as (adapted from Miles & Huberman, 1994):
1. collaborating
2. reviewing the literature
3. generating data
4. storing, protecting and managing data
5. searching
6. transcribing
7. memoing
8. editing
9. coding
10. data linking
11. analysing content
12. data displaying
13. graphic mapping
14. writing
15. research project managing
The goal of this workshop is to help researchers understand in practice how most of the above activities can be supported by Microsoft Onenote, a highly resourceful and customisable digital notebook, in ways that are easy to use, low-cost, scalable and collaborative.
The constraints of CAQDAS as the canonical digital tool for qualitative research
A large investment in digital tools to support research in the qualitative field has been around the development of CAQDAS, such as Atlas.ti, NVivo, Dedoose, MAXQDA, Hyper Research, QDA miner, Transana, among others, through graduate students' and staff training offers and software acquisitions/subscriptions. CAQDAS has been moving beyond rigorous data analysis to support other activities of the qualitative research process. It has been positioned as the repository of all the research data, processes and outputs, through the inclusion of project management like abilities to afford coordination of the activities involved in the entire process (Silver & Lewins, 2014).
CAQDAS packages are usually costly and have a high learning curve, requiring specialised training (Davidson, J. & Di Gregorio, S. 2011, p. 636). These features put many researchers in a position of "all or nothing" in what concerns software for coordinating the entire research process. For those who choose "nothing", the only digital tools available are often restricted to online collaborative and offline word processors, cloud storage for organizing and sharing data files, transcribing software, literature managers, mind mapping software, and software for audio or video analysis, leaving them with an increased difficulty in managing the research project as a whole.
These difficulties were felt by the authors in the ongoing research project "Attitudes, expectations and practices in the Portuguese secondary schools science laboratories", financed by the Portuguese National Science Foundation (FCT). Several digital tools were used for reviewing the literature, generating data and memoing (Evernote, Onenote and Papers), transcribing, analysing, coding and data linking (Nvivo), data linking and graphic mapping (VUE and Murally), writing (Adobe Indesign and Microsoft Word), collaborating (Google Drive and Skype), storing, protecting and managing data (Bittorrent Sync and Synctoy) and project managing (folders, Tasks and Google Calendar), making difficult the task of managing and integrating all the available data, tools and processes.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Davidson, J. & Di Gregorio, S. (2011) ‘Qualitative Research and Technology: In the Midst of a Revolution’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th edition). London, UK: SAGE. Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2014). Using software in qualitative research: A step by step guide. London, England: SAGE. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London, UK: SAGE. Paulus, T., Lester, J. and Britt, V. (2013) ‘Constructing hopes and fears: A discourse analysis of introductory qualitative research texts’. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(9). Paulus, T., Lester, J. and Dempster, P. (2014) Digital Tools for Qualitative Research. London, England: SAGE.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.