Session Information
24 SES 05, The Role of Mathematical Tasks in Promoting Domain-Specific and Domain-Transcendent Mathematical Reasoning - Mathematically-Situated Reasoning (Part 1)
Symposium to be continued in 24 SES 06
Contribution
The latest educational reforms in Canada (ex.: Quebec Ministry of Education, Leisure, and Sport, 2004) prioritize problem solving in mathematics curriculum, both in elementary and secondary schools. In elementary school, problems are solved using arithmetic i.e. concrete numbers and operations. In secondary school, they are solved using algebra i.e. equations, inequalities, functions, knowledge of structures and relationships (Kieran, 1989; Schmidt & Bednarz, 2002; Cai & Knuth, 2011). In middle school, problems become more mathematically complex and students who continue to rely on the concrete numerical data and sequential operations on them experience severe difficulties. As these students move on to secondary schools, their problem-solving difficulties are compounded with difficulties in algebra, working with letters among other things (Bednarz et al. 1996). Researchers who studied the transition from arithmetic to algebra (Kieran 2014; Radford 2012; Carraher & Martinez 2008; Malara & Navarra 2002) argue that the development of algebraic reasoning should start in early grades in parallel with or within the study of arithmetic. In my doctoral research (Polotskaia, 2015), I studied young students thinking development when they were learning to model mathematical relationships present in arithmetic word problems. To ensure the smooth arithmetic-algebra transition, I complemented the modeling activities with a computer task where numbers were coded with letters in the text of word problems. Students had possibility to create a solution using letters or numbers. The video-recorded data of students’ performance analysed using the theoretical model of problem-solving-cycle (Savard, 2008) revealed positive results. At the beginning, all students used numbers to solve computer task problems, but after training, majority opted to letters. Students were able to analyse and express relationships between quantities in a general form using letters, performing reasoning of algebraic type. The study demonstrated great potential of the teaching approach for the development of algebraic thinking in young students.
References
Bednarz, N., Kieran, C. & Lee, L., 1996. Approaches to algebra: Perspctives for research and teaching Mathematic., Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Carraher, D.W. & Martinez, M. V, 2008. Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, pp.3–22. Kieran, C., 2014. What does research tell us about fostering algebraic thinking in arithmetic? NCTM, (2012). Malara, N.A. & Navarra, G., 2002. Influences of a procedural vision of arithmetics in algebra learning. In CERME. pp. 1–8. Quebec Ministry of Education, Leisure, and Sport, 2004. Québec education program. Mathematics, science and technology. Mathematics, pp.182–222. Radford, L., 2012. Early algebraic thinking: Epistemological, semiotic, and developmental issues. In 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Seoul, Korea. Savard, A., 2008. Le dévelopement d’une pensée critique envers les jeux de hasard et d'argent par l'enseignement des probabilités à l'école primaire: Vers une prise de décision. Université Laval.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.