Session Information
Contribution
Social justice has become a concept that is critically discussed in political, economic, social and legal areas in our global world. Educational organizations as being actors at the center of social and political changes are imminently influenced from social justice debates and practices (Birkenmaier, 2003). The concept of social justice has been a key concept in the discussion of the impacts of capitalism, neoliberalism and globalism since 20th century. Explaining the concepts democracy and pluralism is also benefited from social justice as well. Social justice expresses maintenance of public and social goods, capture of the common good, balanced distribution of economic, social and cultural capital forms between social classes. In fact, social justice aims to maintain balance of power in favor of the oppressed social classes, to reduce imbalances in income distribution and to raise living standards of people in the society. In terms of legal aspect, Miller (1999) describes social justice as maintenance of the rights, assurance of basic community needs and expectations, life safety, fair distribution of the resources, and accessibility. Specifically, fundamental principles of social justice are citizenship that does not compromise cultural, racial, ethnic, economic, linguistic, religious discrimination. On the other hand, it involves legal protection of the citizenship model, opportunities to equal access for all kind of resources, and fair distribution of resources (Miller, 1999). Social justice in education refers to the role of schools in equal distribution of resources with their institutional and democratic endeavors in recognition of the rights, freedom, demands, identity and culture (Apple & Beane, 2009; Bates, 2005).
Social justice in education is essential to be explained by existence of democracy. Social justice in schools is also a struggle for democracy. Indeed, democracy is the transformation of power areas in favor of society and the public benefit, ensuring participation in decision making, and the recognition of rights, freedom and autonomy. Democracy provides individuals the ability to solve problems about equality and justice in schools with creating an active citizenship model. Since social justice and democracy are related constructs, and social justice is associated with access to democratic rights, social rights and social justice are believed to strengthen democracy (Toens, 2007). Consequently, it is necessary to transform democratic attitudes and competencies, democratic society structure, hierarchical power and authorities in order to manage social justice. Therefore, it is essential to propose social justice and democracy components into teacher education agenda to give a political vision for teacher education programs (Hyten, 2015). It is also asserted that the content of teacher education is required to be designed with pluralistic perspective and academic development of prospective teachers needs to be proposed by democratic values within the framework of critical pedagogy (Gunzenhauser, 2015). Furthermore, it is believed that prospective teachers should experience democracy culture, social justice and multiculturalism principles in educational practices in order to develop a particular point of view (Juarez & Hayes, 2010; Ritchie, 2012; Warren, 2002). Therefore, main focus of today’s educational practices is to ensure prospective teachers to get social justice and democracy perceptions. In this context, the purpose of this study is to scrutinize social justice perceptions and democratic attitudes of prospective teachers. It is also aimed to determine the relationship between social justice and democratic attitudes from prospective teachers’ point of view.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Apple, M. W. & Beane, J. A. (2009). Democratic schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Bates, R. (2005). Educational administration and social justice. Paper presented at Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Australia. Birkenmaier, J. (2003). On becoming a social justice practitioner. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 22(2-3), 41-54. Gozutok, D. (1995). Ögretmenlerin demokratik tutumları. Ankara: Türk Demokrasi Vakfı Yayınları. Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2015). Enacting social justice ethically: Individual and communal habits. A response to ethics in teaching for democracy and social justice. Democracy & Education, 23(2), 1-7. Hu, I., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. Hytten, K. (2015). Ethics in teaching for democracy and social justice. Democracy & Education, 23(2), 1-11. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51. Mooresvile: Scientific Software. Juárez B. G. & Hayes, C. (2010). Social justice is not spoken here: Considering the nexus of knowledge, power and the education of future teachers in the United States. Power and Education, 2(3), 233-252. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Ludlow, L., Pedulla, J., Enterline, S., Cochran-Smith, M., Loftus, F., Salomon-Fernandez, Y., & Mitescu, E. (2008b). From students to teachers: Using surveys to build a culture of evidence and inquiry. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(4), 1-19. Ludlow, L.H., Enterline, S., & Cochran-Smith, M. (2008a). Learning to teach for social justice-beliefs scale: An application of Rasch measurement principles. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 20, 194-214. Ritchie, S. (2012). Incubating and sustaining: How teacher networks enable and support social justice education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 120-131. Toens, K. (2007). The dilemma of regress social justice and democracy in recent critical theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 6(2), 160-179. Warren, K. (2002). Preparing the next generation: Social justice in outdoor leadership education and training. The Journal of Experiential Education, 25(1), 231-238.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.