This presentation will critically analyse findings from a small scale evaluation of a Teacher Development Agency (TDA) funded project that entailed an extended placement for student teachers in a special needs school or resource base setting. The impact on students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes to inclusive practice will be discussed in the context of an understanding of inclusion as presence, participation and achievement (Booth and Ainscow, 2002). The above model of teacher education itself will also be examined from an educational governance perspective (Altrichter, 2010) and its relevance to creating and maintaining inclusive education systems.

A government-led project like the above could claim to respond to what Garner (2000) referred to as 'conceptual unpreparedness' in the context of initial teacher training. More than a decade ago, it was stated that it had not been difficult for a teacher in England to acquire a tendency to exclude (Clough, 1999); unless teachers opted during their initial training to teach children with learning difficulties, they were not expected to do so and the case tends to remain similar. This can be a great barrier to inclusive attitudes on behalf of teachers and the conceptual preparation that enables them to understand difference and cater for it, as part of their role (Paliokosta and Blandford, 2010).

The discussion will stem from the analysis of findings from the following questions;

1.  What are the key learning experiences of different stakeholders (student teachers, school mentors, university lecturers) and their potential impact on practice?

2.  How does the focus on Special Educational Needs relate to an effort to create and maintain inclusive education systems for All (UNESCO, 2001; 2008; 2010)?

3.  How can knowledge generated inform the modular design and the teaching approaches to inclusion on a three year Initial Teacher Education BA (Hons) course?

Altrichter, H. (2010). Theory and Evidence on Governance: conceptual and empirical strategies of research on governance in education. European Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 147-158. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002): Index for Inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (2nd. ed.). Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. Clough, P. (1999) Exclusive tendencies: concepts, consciousness and curriculum in the project of inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3, 1, 63–73. Feeney, A., Gager, A. and Hallett, G. (2008b) The purpose of school placements: a case study of the perceptions of trainee teachers towards their experiences in mainstream and specialist schools. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Gothenburg,10 September Paliokosta, P. and Blandford, S.(2010) Inclusion in school: a policy, ideology or lived experience? Similar findings in diverse school cultures. Support for Learning, 25 /4: 180-186 Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. eds. (1997) Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, . Sage. UNESCO (1994) The Salamanca Statement and Framework For Action on Special Needs Education, Paris. UNESCO (2001) Monitoring report on Education for All 2001. Paris, UNESCO. UNESCO (2010) Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2010. Reaching and Teaching the Most Marginalised. UNESCO: Paris. UNESCO (2008) Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2009. Overcoming Inequality: Why Governance Matters.UNESCO: Paris.