Session Information
23 SES 08 B, Adult Education Policies and Practices
Paper Session
Contribution
This paper presents an investigation of ongoing adult education reforms in a European country, Italy. In so doing, it problematizes the country relations with the European Union (EU) - and to a minor extent with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - and argues these relations are an essential but not sufficient factor to understand national policy reforms in adult education.
Albeit adult education refers to all practices and processes that consider adults as pedagogical subjects, independently from age, responsibilities, educational attainment, socio-economic conditions, and the venues in which they take place, this paper takes a public policy stand. Here adult education is equated for the most to publically-funded education (either via national budgets or the European Social Fund) for out-of-school youth and adults (autochthones as well as immigrants).
Theorethical framework
Publically-funded adult education is a national responsibility. Transnationalism, Europeanization and global governance in education, however, have challenged these assumptions. Scholarly work has increasingly shed light on the workings of international organizations, their efforts in legitimizing specific political interests, and their influences in shaping international and regional adult education agendas through the adoption of new governance mechanisms and the promotion of a global monitoring culture. One of the downsides, however, is the lack of systematic research on how global-local interconnectedness is redefining the public nature and scope of adult education in specific localities, the way adult education policy is made, and how both affect publically-funded adult education interventions in single European countries. Consequently, it is difficult to pinpoint the global-local nexus in adult education and whether and how it affects government-sponsored practice in specific localities (e.g., in Italy - at country, administrate region or municipal levels).
A number of state-led and non-governmental organizations work increasingly together, and with national administrations, to govern the education of out-of-school youth and adults. Such global networks promote either expansion or reduction of governmental expenditure in adult education as a public good that is distinct from other forms of primary, secondary, or tertiary education, and sometime this leads to formal cooperation frameworks, like the one on (adult) skills signed in 2013 between the European Commission and the OECD.
Governmental structures, however, are still the primary actors who can deliberate on what share of national budgets goes to support adult education practice, and what justifies such public expenditure at country, administrate region or municipal levels; deliberations that within the EU, since the global economic crisis (2008-onwards), depends also on joint austerity policies.
By adoption of an interdisciplinary perspective this paper offers conceptual underpinnings for a global political sociology of adult education policy, and then presents a country-led analysis led by the following research question: How do ongoing Italian reform of adult education connects with European political directions and measures?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Beech, J. (2011). Global Panaceas, Local Realities: International agencies and the future of education. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Bindi, F. M. (2011). Italy and the European Union. Rome: Scuola Superiore della Pubblica Amministrazione. Jakobi, A. P. (2009). International Organizations and Lifelong Learning: From Global Agendas to Policy Diffusion. New York: Palgrave McMillan. Jarvis, P. (2012). The Sociology of Adult & Continuing Education, 2nd edition. London & New York: Routledge. Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing education. Governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books. Milana, M. (exp. 2015), “Europæisk ’governance’ og uddannelse: Om de multi-skalære relationer mellem EU, medlemslandene og OECD.” [European governance and education: On multi-scalar relations amid the EU, its member states and the OECD]. In N. R. Jensen and H. C. Dorf (eds), Studier i pædagogisk sociologi – en forskningsantologi. Aarhus: Unipress, Aarhus Universitet. Vavrus, F., and Bartlett, L. (2009). Critical approaches to comparative education – Vertical case studies from Africa, Europe, the Middle East and the Americas. New York: Palgrave McMillan. Rasmussen, P. (2014). Adult learning policy in the European Commission: Development and Status. In M. Milana and J. Holford (Eds.), Adult Education Policy and the European Union: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives (pp. 17-34). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher. Rubenson, K. (exp. 2015). Framing the adult learning and education policy discourse: The role of the OECD. In M. Milana and T. Nesbit (Eds.) Adult Education and Learning Policy: A Worldwide Review. NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan. Torres, C.T. (2013). Political Sociology of Adult Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.