02 SES 08 A, Individual Aspects of Learning and Socialization at the Workplace
Questions and Theoretical Approach (600 words)
In this paper we analyze the emotional engagement of students in their first course of Intermediate VET in Spain.
This analysis is done in the context of a longitudinal study on itineraries of success and abandonment of pupils enrolled in intermediate VET programs in the education system in Spain, which aims to provide evidence on a scientific basis and intervention, that contribute to improving knowledge of the Vocational Training Spanish educational system, and, more specifically, to prevent and correct the serious problem of school dropouts at these levels.
The following analysis is a first phase of the longitudinal study. At this phase, we analyze the emotional engagement of all students coursing their first year; and in the subsequent phases, we will analyze the relationship between emotional engagement at the beginning of the vocational intermediate year and the characteristics of the itineraries carried out (success-dropout).
In this study the global model used for understanding the abandonment and educational success in vocational training lies in the concept of “Student Engagement”. According to Reschly & Christenson (2012), the concept of "student engagement" is divided into four areas of study: emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and academic.
In this case, our goal is to present what variables determine the dimension of emotional engagement, and what results are expected, according to the theory.
The construct of emotional engagement " is of great importance in the investigation according to different studies confirming its decisive role in the prevention of dropout, risk behavior dampers (Li, Lynch, Kalvin, Liu, & Lerner, 2011), flattering and school activity participation, perseverance in the task (Goodenow, 1993), school motivation (Roeser, Eccles, & Sameroff, 1998) and ultimately, academic linkage (Anderson, Christeson, Sinclair, & Lehr, 2004).
The emotional engagement concept is defined from diverse perspectives: positive affective reactions in the classroom, such as enjoyment and interest and personal identification and belonging (González, 2010).
Some scales are not always appropriate to measure the emotional dimension. Firstly, items that tap behavioural engagement and emotional engagement are often combined in a single scale, as in the case of The Rochester Assessment Package for School (RAPS, Wellborn & Connell, 1987). Secondly, the survey items do not specify the source of the emotions. Thirdly, the measures of emotional engagement tend to be more general than related constructs such as interest and value (Frederick, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004).
A reference tool for the development of our questionnaire to evaluate the emotional dimension is the SEI; Student Engagement Instrument (Appleton, Christenson, Kim, & Reschly, 2006). In addition, we have completed measures of parental support through TEDP (Janosz; Archambault; Lacroix & Lévesque, 2007), measuring the perception of parental control that the student has.
The SEI is an instrument that serves the theoretical model presented, and recent studies provide validity and psychometric reliability when applied to a sample of primary and secondary or higher education (Appleton, et al, 2006; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, Christenson, & Huebner, 2010).
References (400 words) Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., & Lehr, C. a. (2004). Check & Connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42(2), 95–113. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. Betts, J; Appleton, J; Reschly, A; Christenson, S; Huebner, E.S. (2010). A study of the factorial invariance of the student engagement instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 84-93. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–10. González, M.T. (2010). El alumno ante la escuela y su propio aprendizaje: algunas líneas de investigación en torno al concepto de implicación., Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación,8(2), 10-31 Janosz, M.; Archambault, I.; Lacroix, M. & Lévesque, J. (2007). Trousse d’évaluation des décrocheurs potentiels (TEDP) : Manuel d’utilisation. Montréal : Groupe de recherche sur les environnements scolaires. Université de Montréal. Kurdek, L. A., & Sinclair, R. J. (2000). Psychological, family, and peer predictors of academic outcomes in first- through fifth-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 449–457. Li, T.; Lynch, A., Kalvin, C., Liu, J.J.; Lerner, R. (2001). Peer relationships as a context for the development of school engagement during early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 35(4), 329-342. Reschly, A.L. & Christenson, S.L. (2012). Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct. En Christentson, S.L.; Reschly, A. & Wylie, C. (ed.). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. NY: Springer, pp 3-20. Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (1998). Academic and emotional functioning in early adolescence: Longitudinal relations, patterns, and predictions by experience in middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 321-352. Stipek, D. (2002). Good instruction is motivating. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 309-332). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Wang, M. T., Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Trajectories of family management practices and early adolescence behavioral outcomes in middle school. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1324–1341. Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1987). Manual for the Rochester Assessment Packagefor Schools. Rochester,NY: University of Rochester.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.