Session Information
00 SES 08, Education and Research in a Post-Fact World: Responses, responsibilities and possibilities
EERA Session
Contribution
In this paper, we will look at three different media events in Sweden, in which educational researchers shared their results and conclusions on 1) the PISA assessments, 2) the Swedish grading system, 3) the teacher training program in Sweden. On these three occasions a surprisingly animated discussion took part between researchers, politicians, teachers and the public opinion. In many cases the educational researchers where accused of having it wrong and facts they put forward even got ridiculed. Of course, it is a sign of a sound and vital society not just to uncritically accept facts and information produced by the research community, but when anecdotal evidence and common sense opinions seemingly are given the same weight as experts in public debate, the legitimacy of research is at risk. In our paper, we will conduct a media analysis based on three traditional newspapers publications and the online comments to our three media events. We will also investigate 20 of the most influential educational blogs for the same events. Departing from the notion of Niklas Luhmann that Mass media do not just depict social reality, but in a real sense produce it: ‘What we know about the world we live in we know through mass media’ (Luhmann 2009, p. 9) we will conduct an actor network theory analysis in which the techniques of linking and liking are treated as important for the production of the world as the facts and anecdotes (cf Latour 1987). The networks that are produced are considered not “as metaphors, but as socio-material performances that enact reality” (Fenwick 2010). We will firstly investigate if research comments on PISA and national assessments are discussed in a primarily positive way, a primarily negative (or seemingly falsifying) way or in a neutral or ambivalent way (see further Waldow 2017). Secondly, we will look at how these references are interlinked in the social media web. The paper will illustrate how in a post truth society scientific facts are re-negotiated in a manner in which ordinary techniques of producing valid knowledge (theory, research method, analysis, claims) no longer count in the eyes of the public.
References
Fenwick, T. (2019). (un)Doing standards in education with actor‐network theory, Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 117-133. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press. Luhmann, Niklas. 2009. Die Realität der Massenmedien [ e Reality of the Mass Media]. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenscha en. Waldow, F. (2017). Projecting images of the ‘good’ and the ‘bad school’: top scorers in educational large-scale assessments as reference societies. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2016.1262245
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.