Main Content
Session Information
18 SES 14, Researching Social Justice and Health (in)Equality across different School Health and Physical Education Contexts
Symposium
Contribution
Based on experiences from the initial year of the EDUHEALTH-project, including a challenge by the discussant Professor Standal during our ECER symposium in 2017 to further explicate our (theoretical) understanding of social justice, this paper addresses ways of conceptualising social justice in relation to school health and physical education (HPE). Broadly, we conceptualise the term social justice in relation to equity and take inspiration from Bell’s (1997) concept of social justice as both a process and a goal, with an emphasis on the latter. In this paper, we will discuss different theoretical perspectives that we consider both relevant and potentially useful in relation to understanding and subsequently analysing pedagogies for social justice in HPE practice, as informed by the works of Habermas, Bourdieu, Foucault and Uljens. Habermas’ (1999) model for communicative action is built on solidarity and non-hierarchical relations where the participants share a mutual understanding. The most relevant concepts from Habermas related to the EDUHEALTH-project and social justice are power to set education in action, the moral problems based on finding fair solutions and solidarity as communicating on equal terms. Bourdieu’s (1990) theories offers the possibility to analyse hidden or taken-for-granted power relations as related to social justice. More specifically, Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus, capital, doxa provides an appropriate frame for understanding how inequalities are reproduced in a specific social context such as school HPE. Foucault’s (2000) work with his particular emphasis on how power functions in our society rather than the location of power, provides an analytical framework for understanding the effect of HPE practices on student subjectivities as shaped by discourse and the workings of power. A Foucauldian analysis can help us better understand how certain discursive practices in HPE have the potential of transforming rather than reproducing inequitable power relations and outcomes for the students in this school subject. Uljens (1997, 2015) state that social justice is about focusing on transforming society through non-affirmative education; problematizing established norms, practices, and knowledge. As well as non-hierarchical education; understanding education as situated neither solely inside, nor outside of, society, “but attempts to mediate between the two” (Uljens, 2015: 27). The intention of presenting and discussing these various theoretical perspectives is to be challenged by both the discussant and others present at the symposium as to which perspective(s) that will provide the most relevant new knowledge for both researchers and practitioners in the field of HPE.
References
Bell, L A (1997) Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. Bell and P. Griffin (Eds), Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice: A Sourcebook New York: Routledge, (pp 3-15). Bourdieu, P (1990) The Logic of Practise. Cambridge: Polity Press Bourdieu, P & Passeron, JC (2008) Reproduktionen. Bidrag till en teori om utbildningssystemet. Lund: Arkiv Foucault, M (2000) Power: Essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984, Volume 3. London: Penguin. Habermas, J (1999) Kraften i de bedre argumenter [The power in the better arguments]. In R. Kalleberg (Ed.), (pp. 65-79). Oslo: Ad notam Gyldendal. Uljens, M (1997) School Didactics and Learning. Hove: Psychology Press. Uljens, M (2015) Curriculum work as educational leadership – paradoxes and theoretical foundations, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1, 22–30.
Programme by Network 2019
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
Network 28. Sociologies of Education
Network 29. Reserach on Arts Education
Network 30. Research on Environmental und Sustainability Education
Network 31. Research on Language and Education (LEd)
Network 32. Organizational Education
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
Marginal Content
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.