01 SES 08 C, Principal Leadership for Professional Learning
Teacher´s professional development is a crucial element for building of school quality. One of the tools is a group supervision in school (Aseltine, Faryniarz & Rigazio-DiGilio, 2006). The basic purpose of supervision is to improve teaching and learning through reflection of schooling practices and its verbalization. It helps teachers find out whether and what they can do in different way to promote their self-efficacy, teaching practices and relationships with colleagues, students and parents (Green, 1992; Sidhu & Fook, 2010).
Although many studies confirm efficiency of supervision among teachers (Judge & Bono, 2001), there are also obstacles for/in schools to organize supervision. For effective promotion of supervision, it is important to understand what teaches consider to be difficulties of supervision and what contributes to negative attitudes toward supervisions. Apart from the teachers, principals of schools and school psychologists should be also questioned because they are the ones who come up with the idea of supervision and advocate it.
In the paper, we will present the research on principals and school psychologists from Czech elementary schools. The aim of the study was to find out whether principals and psychologists consider supervisions a beneficial tool, what were their experiences with supervision of teacher´s team in their schools and what obstructions they encountered when promoting supervision in their schools.
The research combined a qualitative study and a quantitative survey. The qualitative study was based on interviews with 15 head of elementary schools and 11 school psychologists. The interviews focused on teacher´s professional development, group evaluation and supervision. Their general beliefs, knowledge and experience within their schools were also explored. Based on the analysis of interviews, the survey for school principals and the survey for school psychologists were designed. Both surveys focused on sources and structure of positive and/or negative attitudes toward supervision and experience with supervision in the schools. The on-line surveys were sent via emails to all elementary schools in the Czech Republic. The sample consisted of 1,800 principals and 740 psychologists. Quantitative data were analyzed using statistical analyses.
There has not been yet any systematic support for supervision in educational institutions in the Czech Republic. Therefore most school principals do not use supervision in their schools and even high number of them is not sure what supervision exactly means and which effects it can have. Psychologists were well informed about supervision and its benefits for teachers. Both groups find the main obstacles in teacher´s exhaustion and teacher´s resistance to professional development (except education). All detail results from quantitative and qualitative study will be presented. The implications for school practice (i.e. how to introduce the idea of supervision in the teacher´s team, how to sett up the organizational conditions and how to convince teachers to engage in the supervisions) will be discussed in the presentation as well.
Sidhu, G. K., & Fook, C. Y. (2010). Formative supervision of teaching and learning: Issues and concerns for the school head. European Journal of Scientific Research, 39(4), 589-605. Aseltine, J. M., Faryniarz, J. O., & Rigazio-DiGilio, A. J. (2006). Supervision for learning: A performance-based approach to teacher development and school improvement. ASCD. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(1), 80. Green, M. (1992). Teacher supervision as professional development: Does it work? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7 (2), 131-148.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.