Session Information
29 SES 14, Parallel Paper Session
Paper Session
Contribution
In today's art environment where all branches of art are practised in an integrated and involved form as a result of the changing sociological and technological structure of the age, painting art, accompanied by its new ontology, is one of the kinds of visual arts we encounter. The ontological structure of painting art, which dates back to thousands of years ago, has been changing in accordance with society's change paradigms. Painting is a result of a thought the development of which depends on the action and which then turns into a two-dimensional expression. Due to its permanent key features, painting is considered as a traditional art. Traditional arts and key concepts and main structures of art in the traditional sense are general priority targets of art education. By providing different understandings of application, art workshops are practical supplements of the aesthetic and theoretical structure which is aimed to be established at different levels of art education. In addition to traditional, formalist, technical, theoretical and progressive teaching styles, there is also a need for a teaching style that enables a conceptual and postmodern formation in these classes. Painting art is practised by traditional teaching styles at institutions of undergraduate programs in art education and, in theoretical context, reflects characteristics of modernism and theories up to modernism. Adoption of a teaching process with these limitations leads to uncertainties between the process and the integrated structure of the semester or yearly schedule. Therefore, after mentioning the importance of painting art among other practices of arts today, it is aimed to put forth its interdisciplinary context. Afterwards, teaching of painting at undergraduate level of art education is emphasized, and then current problem is to be expressed by comparing painting in contemporary art practices and painting workshops at undergraduate level of art education.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Ackerman, D. & Perkins, D.N. (1989). Integrating Thinking and Learning Skills Across the Curriculum. Design and Implementation, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA. Aktulum K. (2008). Parçalılık/Süreksizlik/Kopukluk. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Dergisi. Baudrillard J. (2010). Nesneler Sistemi. (Çev: Oğuz Adanır ve Aslı Karamollaoğlu).İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi. Creswell J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquıry& Research Design. London: Sage Publications.(2.ed.) Danto A. C. (2010). Sanatın Sonundan Sonra: Çağdaş Sanat ve Tarihin Sınır Çizgisi. (Çev:Zeynep Demirsü). İstanbul:Ayrıntı Yayınları. Dewey J. (1996). Demokrasi ve Eğitim. (Çev: M. Salih Otaran), İstanbul: Başarı Yayımcılık Efland A.,Freedman K. & Stuhr P. (1996). Postmodern Art Education: An Approach to Curriculum. National Art Education Association. 49,5. s.49-56 Eisner E. (1987). The Role of Disciplin-Based Art Education in America’s Schools. Art Education. 40,5. s.6-27. Erbay, Mutlu. (1997). Plastik Sanatlar Eğitimi’nin Gelişimi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1. Basım, İstanbul. Gaudelius Y. ve Speirs P. (2002). Contemporary Issues in Art Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Giderer H. E. (2003). Resmin Sonu. Ankara:Ütopya Yayınevi. Holt D. K. (1990). Postmodernism vs. High Modernism:The Relationship to D.B.A.E. and Its Critics. Art Education. 43,2. s.42-46. Kırışoğlu O. T. (2009). Sanat, Kültür, Yayıncılık: Görsel Sanatlarda ve Kültür Eğitim Öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi. Lyotard J. F. (1990). Postmodern Durum. Postmodernizm. (Çev.Ahmet Çiğdem). İstanbul:Ara Yayıncılık. Marshall J. (2004). Metaphor in Art, Tought and Learning. Semiotics and Visual Culture: Sights, Signs and Significance. Deborah L., Smith-Shank (Editor). Reston: National Art Education Association. (bölüm 9). Stocroki M. (2005). Models of Integration in Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Short History. Interdisciplinary Art Education: Building Bridges to Connect Disciplines and Cultures. Reston: National Art Education Association. (Part 1, Cap.1). Ulbricht J.(1998). Interdisciplinary Art Education Reconsidered, Art Education. S.51.(4). s.16.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.