Session Information
15 SES 10, International Comparison on Education Research Organizations, Research Policies, Quality-Standards Construction, and the Relationship between Research and Practices (Part 1)
Symposium: to be continued in 15 SES 11
Contribution
This research will focus on ‘international comparison of universities' faculty's evaluation and promotion models’. It is important to study systematically the various models (including the assessment of research, teaching, service, the administration and management) of university faculty’s evaluation and promotion, to identify the effects that national government (mainly through higher education policy) impose on the universities, especially those national system models that are located at the core and that comprise the various stratifications in the world. The main aim of this research is to offer useful proposals to construct the universities' faculty's evaluation and promotion system for Taiwan from an international perspective. Hence, this paper will employ research methods such as historical research, document analysis, and comparative research to examine research reports and review crucial journal articles in order to analyze and compare the development, transformation and tendencies of the theme of university faculty's evaluation and promotion in EU, OECD and those selected object-countries such as Australia, France, German, Japan, USA and UK, with a view to improving the mechanism for evaluation and promotion of education researchers in Taiwan.
Method
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.