Session Information
15 SES 09 A, National Partnership Initiatives
Paper Session
Contribution
The Norwegian education authorities have exceeded expectations that researchers from teacher education and schoolteachers interact (Norwegian: Samhandling) and develop their practice through joint school-based Research-Practice Partnerships (RPP). Samhandling is a Norwegian term that connotes interaction, collaboration, and cooperation in a single word (Torgersen & Steiro, 2009, 2018). Joint school-based RPP aims to develop practical, motivational, and relevant practices that can facilitate solving yet unexpected and unforeseen challenges in the future society. RPP in itself is unforeseen, as it does not have clear aims. There is an increasing interest in how organizations prepare for unexpected and unforeseen challenges (fx. Torgersen, 2015; Weick & Sutcliffe, 2001). This study draws on a Norwegian five-year national initiative for joint school-based RPP – "Lower-secondary schools in development" (UiU) (Utdanningsdirektoratet, 2013-2017 - Ministry of Education), and explores conditions for samhandling in joint school-based RPP in light of Torgersen and Steiro's understanding of Samhandling as a phenomenon. More specifically, we investigate how teachers and researchers perceive the role distribution in the UiU initiative. Role perceptions can have implications for the practice and praxis.
Method
This study is conducted with a quantitative and qualitative digital survey for the data collection ("mixed methods") (for example, Creswell, 2012; Creswell, 2013; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009). The survey respondents are randomly selected 137 teachers and 25 researchers from 18 counties in Norway who have participated in the said initiative. This article is based on findings from the survey. The theory on Samhandling that informs the survey is developed by Torgersen and Steiro (2009) based on a meta-analysis. Their fifteen samhandling indicators matrix has contributed to systemizing the questionnaire's development and a mirror for our study's data analysis.
Expected Outcomes
Our study found that joint school-based RPP projects currently seem to be mainly based on traditional roles where researchers are perceived as educators and schoolteachers as learners. We argue that such perceptions of role distribution in joint school-based RPP projects might lead to knowledge reconstruction instead of new insights. In our opinion, when aiming to develop practical, motivational, and relevant practices that can facilitate solving yet unexpected and unforeseen challenges, joint school-based RPPs can benefit from exploring new roles. By not empowering stakeholders to contribute sufficiently with their expertise, joint school-based RPPs can risk losing learning opportunities. A more resource-oriented perspective on stakeholders can lead to better use of valuable expertise and perhaps also to new insights.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, Mass.: Pearson. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications. Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337-358. Sæverot, H. (2017). Pedagogikkvitenskap [Pedagogical science]. Oslo: Fagbookforlaget. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences: Sage. Torgersen, G. E. (2015). Pedagogikk for det uforutsette. [Pedagogy for the Unforeseen]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. Torgersen, G.-E., & Steiro, T. (2009). Samhandling: “Keiserens nye klær” eller nytt begrepsinnhold? [Interaction: "The Emperor's New Clothes" or New Conceptual Content?]. In G. E. Torgersen & T. I. Steiro (red.), Ledelse, samhandling og opplæring i fleksible organisasjoner—en menneskeliggjøring av styringssystemer. [Management, interaction and training in flexible organizations—a humanization of management systems]. 1. edition. (p. 120-166). Stjørdal: Læringsforlaget. Torgersen, G.-E., & Steiro, T. (2018). Defining the term Samhandling. In G.-E. Torgersen (red.), Interaction: ‘Samhandling’ under risk. A Step Ahead of the Unforeseen (p. 39-54): Cappelen Damm Akademiske. Utdanningsdirektoratet. [Ministry of education] (2013-2017). Ungdomstrinn i utvikling. [Lower-secondary schools in development ] from https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/nasjonale-satsinger/ungdomstrinn-i-utvikling/ Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246. doi: 10.1177/135050840072002 Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected (Vol. 9): San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.