Session Information
01 SES 10 A, Professional Development Centres
Paper Session
Contribution
Management and leadership at the University have suffered an important increase of pressure to adapt even to external demands and to change requirements received for those organizations during last decades. From this point of view, “new managerilism” (Deem, 2005) has been a discourse that impulse the adoption of some technologies practices and values tipically adscribed to private sector, inside public organizations,. Anyway, University managers are no longer seen as administrators that make decisions on their own. Nowadays, they are expected to develop leadership practices characerized for some features as:
(a) Distributed or shared leadership, where leadership is no longer an individual feature but a social process, therefore the whole group must be excellent (Gardner, 2000: 12).
(b) Collective processes of decision making, promoting democracy even if this way of functioning contrasts with cultural and organizational fragmentation that are typically showen by Universities (Sánchez & López, 2003).
(c) Balance between pedagogical and management issues, widely deffended (Yielder & Codling, 2004) but not always achieved.
So numerous demands suggest the convinience of a leadership training for university managers which take into account some recommendations such as:
- Being oriented towards the consolidation of the managers identity as leaders (Wolverton & als, 2005; Aasen & Stensaker, 2007).
- Giving priority to practical knowledge and to experiencies discussions (Aasen & Stensaker, 2007; Calabrese & als, 2008).
- Putting in connection training and collegial dicourses, avoiding a managerialist conception of university leadership (Aasen & Stensaker, 2007; Calabrese & als, 2008).
- Adapting needs and specific features of Universities as organizations (Aasen & Stensaker, 2007; Calabrese & als, 2008).
- Including technologies to collaborative relations (Calabrese & als, 2008)
Besides those specific guidelines, we think it would be useful to contemplate others that were proposed by Pulido & als (2010) about general training programmes for University teachers; as well as those proposed by Leadership Fundation for Higher Education (2009): diversity, internalization, interconection and sustainable development.
Taking the exposed ideas into account, our research group is developing a research study[1] whose main purpose is to identify good practices of management developed by academic managers at different organizational levels of the University with the final aim of designing and putting into practice a training programme for those teachers that are interested in management and direction at the University. One of the most relevant elements of that programme will be a blog dedicated to expose and share Management Experiences. Those experiences could be the basis for the construction of a network for the exchange of knowledge and management practices among researchers interested in that topic.
[1] Sánchez Moreno, M. (Head) Formación de gestores y construcción de una red de buenas prácticas para el gobierno y la gestión de la universidad, granted by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, National Plan of Research + Development + innovation (2011–2014) reference: EDU2011-26437.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Aasen, P. & Stenzaker, B. (2007) Balancing trust and technocracy? Leadership training in higher education. International Journal of Educational management. 21 (5): 371- 383. Blackmore, P and Blackwell, R. (2006) Strategic leadership in academic development. Studies in Higher Education. 31, (3): 373- 387. Bryman, A. (2007) Effective leadership in higher education: a literature review. Studies in Higher Education. 32, (6): 693- 710. Calabrese, R. (2008) Emerging technologies in global communication. Using appreciative inquiry to improve the preparation of school administrators. International Journal of Educational management. 22 (7): 696- 709. Deem, R. (2005) Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217-235. Del Favero, M. (2006) Disciplinary variation in preparation for academic dean role. Higher Education Research and Development 25, 3, 277- 292. Gardner, J. (2000) The nature of leadership. En: M. Fullan (Ed.) The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (pp.3-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Pulido, J., Aguilar, V. Y Alemán, J. (2010) La formación de directivos universitarios en España, Reino Unido, Francia y Alemania en en Manzanares, A. (Ed) Organizar y dirigir en la complejidad. Instituciones educativas en evolución. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer España S.A. ISBN 978-84-7197-649-9, pp.572-585. Scott, S. y Webber, C. (2008) Evidence- based Leadership Development: the 4L framework. Journal of Educational Administration. 46 (6): 762- 776 Spendlove, M. (2007). Competencies for effective leadership in higher education, International Journal of Educational Management, 21 (5) 407-417 Wolverton, M., Ackerman, R. & Holt, S. (2005) Preparing for Leadership: What Academic Department Chairs Need to Know. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 27 (2): 227- 238. Yielder, J. y Codling, A. (2004) Management and Leadership in the contemporary university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(3), 315-328.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.