The Influence of Student Characteristics and Gender on Grades in Compulsory School

Session Information

09 SES 01A, General Aspects in Assessment

Paper Session

Time:
2008-09-10
09:15-10:45
Room:
AK2 139
Chair:
Monica Rosén

Contribution

Introduction A large amount of research argues that grades are influenced by subjectivity and that factors other than achievement, such as different student characteristics, teachers’ grading practices and systematic differences within and between schools, exert an influence on grades (Brookhart, 1994; Cliffordson, 2004; Klapp Lekholm & Cliffordson, in press; Pilcher, 1994). Although the relation between cognitive ability and achievement is strong (Gustafsson & Balke, 1993) different non-cognitive factors, such as students’ attitudes, interest, motivation, out-of-school experiences, family values and gender, all seem to be of importance for understanding achievement and grade differences (Wang & Lin, 2005). In a previous study, (Klapp Lekholm & Cliffordson, in press) two dimensions in grades were identified at both an individual and a school level; a subject-specific dimension (achievement) related to grades and national tests scores in three core subjects, and a common grade dimension (non-cognitive factors) related only to grades and which cut across the different subjects. The result also showed that there were gender differences in the common grade dimension. Background There is a substantial amount of research on the importance of teachers’ expectations of student behaviour in the assignment of grades. In order to obtain high grades, students should, for example, be interested, motivated and cooperative. In particular, student interest has been shown to be an important cognitive and emotional resource for school outcomes (Hidi et al., 2004) and students may have both domain-specific interests (sports, school-subject) as well as more general interests in learning. In most industrial countries, research has found that girls perform better in school and obtain better grades (Nycander, 2006). Murphy (2000) has also suggested that out-of-school experiences give students different opportunities to perform in school, and that boys and girls encounter different expectations from parents, teachers and society at large. The main aim of the present study was to investigate how different student characteristics and gender influence the subject-specific and common grade dimensions. Additionally, interest was focused on the investigation of the mediating effects of gender via student characteristics on grades.

Method

Method Data derives from The Gothenburg Educational Longitudinal Database (GOLD) which contains register data compiled by Statistics Sweden for all individuals born between 1972-1992. The subjects were 99 070 students born in 1987, who left compulsory school in 2003. This is the whole population and full information is available for subject grades and national tests scores in Swedish, English and mathematics, as well as for gender. The student questionnaire data used in this study comes from the ETF-project (Evaluation Through Follow-up) where a 10% nationally representative sample has been collected. The methods of analyses used were Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM). As measures of model fit, the χ² goodness-of-fit test and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) were used and missing data analyses have been conducted (Muthén, Kaplan & Hollis, 1987). Mplus version 3 (Muthén & Muthén) was used for the estimation and testing of the models. STREAMS (Gustafsson & Stahle, 2005), a modelling front-end environment, was used to execute the analyses.

Expected Outcomes

Results and conclusions The result indicates that grades are influenced mostly by students’ achievements in the different subjects, but that grades are also influenced by different non-cognitive characteristics, such as interest and parental support. The result also indicates that student interest is the characteristic that exerts the greatest influence on the common grade dimension, and that it influences grades positively, whilst general interest in learning accounts for the entirety of gender differences in the common grade dimension. Thus, one important mechanism behind the advantage in grades for girls seems to be that they express a greater amount of interest in schoolwork than boys.

References

References Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers´ grading: Practice and theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 30 (2), 123-142. Cliffordson, C. (2004). Betygsinflation i de målrelaterade gymnasiebetygen. (Inflation in goal-referenced grades from upper secondary school]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 9 (1), 1-14. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Balke, G. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 28 (4), 407-434. Gustafsson, J.-E., & Stahle, P.-A. (2005). STREAMS 3.0 user´s guide. Mölndal, Sweden: Multivariateware. Klapp Lekholm, A., & Cliffordson, C. (in press). Discrepancies between school grades and test scores at individual and school level: Effects of gender and family background. Educational Research and Evaluation. Pilcher, J. K. (1994). The value-driven meaning of grades. Educational Assessment, 2 (1), 69-88. Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Murphy, P. (2000). Equity, assessment, and gender. In J. Salisbury & S. Ridell (Eds), Gender, policy and educational change (pp. 134-152). London: Routledge. Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modelling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrica, 52 (3), 431-462. Nycander, M. (2006). Pojkars och flickors betyg [Grades received by boys and girls. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet, Departement of Education. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus User´s guide (3rd edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Author Information

Göteborg university
Department of Education
Göteborg
186
University West, Sweden

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.