The Use of Electronic Portfolios to Promote Self-Regulatory Skills for Children with Learning Difficulties

Author(s):

Diane Buhagiar

Conference:

ECER 2008

Network:

21. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)

Format:

Paper

Session Information

PRE_M1a, Paper Session

Paper Session

Time:

2008-09-09

14:00-15:00

Room:

C E38

Chair:

Florentina Lustig

Contribution

The new Northern Irish educational curriculum implemented in 2007, analogous to the majority of modern curricula in developed states, promotes the development of thinking skills and personal capabilities for lifelong learning. A major focus is thus the promotion and maximisation of one’s skills to operate effectively and meet the increasing intellectual demands of society. A very important part of this development is conferring the ability to manage oneself by the continuous assessment of personal strengths and weaknesses, setting goals and directing one’s actions towards the successful achievement of these previously set goals. Although these skills may be acquired by some individuals through a natural, almost automatic learning curve, others may need to be specifically taught such self-regulating skills with a certain degree of investment of resources. Students with learning difficulties, in particular, fall within the latter group, as they are notoriously weak at managing their own learning. With this in perspective, this study is based on the notion that if approaches are thoroughly designed, even children with mild to moderate learning difficulties can successfully work towards becoming autonomous and self-regulating learners. This paper presents a case study documenting the design and implementation of a pilot electronic portfolio system aimed at promoting self-regulatory skills in students with learning difficulties. Portfolios have been used in a variety of academic settings with wide-ranging purposes and content. Their use in this study is congruent with their most basic definition, namely of being a repository of evidence that demonstrate effort, progress and achievement over time in an attempt to encourage students to become more critical and reflective learners. This definition is taken a step further here to make portfolios more accessible to the participating population by including interactive activities that enhance their gradual acquisition of skills that help them learn how to learn the material presented to them. The latter therefore involves the participants setting their own objectives, reflecting upon how best to reach them and ultimately attempting to reach these objectives. While focusing on exploring issues of design and integration of an electronic version of a portfolio, this paper discusses issues and possibilities of its use towards the acquisition of self-regulation skills for children with learning difficulties. Students required to portray self-regulatory skills should seek to actively and constructively participate in a process of meaning-making while being mediated by a community and its cultural artifacts. Perspectives from socio-cultural theory are used as a framework to combine analysis of the individual student and the external social world of the classroom in which activities of electronic portfolio development are carried out.

Method

The study uses data from observations and interviews with teachers and students from a special secondary school in Northern Ireland to analyse and evaluate the effectiveness of using these electronic portfolios with this population.

Expected Outcomes

Results indicate that the processes of developing an electronic portfolio have a significant positive affect on students’ development of self-regulation skills, with both teachers and students reporting positive notions about the method. The findings of this research help to provide insight into effective ways of using electronic portfolios to foster self-regulatory skills in students with learning difficulties.

References

Barrett, H. C. (2007) Researching Electronic Portfolios and Learner Engagement: The REFLECT Initiative. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449. Benevento, J. A. (2004). A Self-Regulated Learning Approach for Children with Learning/Behaviour Disorders. Springfield : Charles C. Thomas Publisher Ltd. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A New Concept Embraced by Researchers, Policy Makers, Educators, Teachers, and Students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186. Cassel, J. and Reid, R. (1996). Use of a Self-Regulated Strategy Intervention to Improve Word Problem-Solving Skills of Students with Mild Disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6(2), 153-172. CCEA (2007). Northern Ireland Curriculum. Belfast:PMB Publicaiton. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K., (2000). Research Methods in Education, 5th ed. London : RoutledgeFalmer. DENI (2004). Empowering Schools Strategy: Transforming Learning, Teaching and Leadership Through Education and Technology Change. Belfast: Education Technology Strategy Management Group. http://www.empoweringschools.com/default.asp, (19/02/07). DfES (2003). Every Child Matters. London : DfES. DfES (2004). Teaching Strategies and Approaches for Pupils with Special Educational Needs: A Scoping Study. London : DfES. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR516.pdf, (12/01/07). Perry, N. E. (1998). Young Children's Self-regulated Learning and Contexts that Support It. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715-729. Perry, N. E. and VandeKamp, K. J. O. (2000). Creating Classroom Contexts that Support Young Children's Development of Self-regulated Learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(7), 821-843. Perry, N. E. et al. (2002). Investigating Teacher-Student Interactions That Foster Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5-15. Pintrich, P. R., (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M. (eds.). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego : Academic Press. Greeno, J., Collins, A. & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In Berliner, D. & Calfee, R. (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan. Hartnell-Young, E. (2006). ePortfolios for knowledge and learning. In Jafari, A. & Kaufmann, C. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on ePortfolios. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1995). Social Origins of Self-regulatory Competence: The Role of Observational Learning Through Peer Modeling. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis. Stefani, L., Mason, R. & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios : supporting personal development and reflective learning. London : Routledge. Tosh, D. et al. (2006). ‘The Learning Landscape: A Conceptual Framework for ePortfolios’. In Jafari, A. & Kaufmann, C. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on ePortfolios. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. In Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner,S. & Souberman, E., (eds.). Massachusetts : Harvard University Press. Wenger, E. (1991). Communities of Practice: Where Learning Happens. Benchmark Magazine, Fall Issue, http://www.ewenger.com/pub/index.htm, (15/04/07). Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as Action. New York : Oxford University Press. Winne, P. H. (2005). Key Issues in Modeling and Applying Research on Self-regulated Learning. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 54(2), 232-238. Winne, P. H. and Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In Pintrich, M., Boekaerts, M. and Zeidner, M. (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Orlando : Academic Press. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks : Sage. Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329 -339.

Author Information

Diane Buhagiar

Queen's University Belfast

School of Education

Drogheda

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.

Search the ECER Programme

Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
Search for authors and in the respective field.
For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.