Conceptualisations of teaching and learning in university teachers: practice, participation and academic identity
Conference:
ECER 2008
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 03A, Academic Development in Higher Education (Part 1)

Paper Session

Time:
2008-09-10
14:00-15:30
Room:
B2 213
Chair:
Barbara Zamorski

Contribution

This paper discusses data collected as part of a larger, ongoing qualitative research project exploring the practices of higher education (HE), and how these serve to include or exclude students from participation in the community of HE. Using a Communities of Practice framework (Wenger, 1998), informed by notions of situated learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991) and situated cognition (Lave, 1997) previous work has explored practice, participation and community from the perspective of students in transition to HE (O’Donnell & Tobbell, 2007). The present paper takes as its focus data collected from semi-structured interviews with university teachers, as well as email conversations between university teachers. Analysis, taking a grounded theory approach, reveals university teachers’ conceptualisations of learning, how these manifest in different approaches to teaching and in an emphasis on different HE practices. In addition, as both teachers and researchers, academic staff experience tensions between the valued practices of these two communities, and the extent to which these are negotiated is revealed in their academic identities. We conclude that university teachers’ notions of learning are individualistic, and that learning in HE can usefully be viewed as process which is distributed across the whole community of learners, teachers, contexts and practices, rather than an a process which occurs within individual learners.

Method

Taking a qualitative approach, the research uses a semi-structured interview methodology, but also makes use of the content of email conversations as sources of data.

Expected Outcomes

We conclude that university teachers’ notions of of what learning is, and what a university teacher's role is, are individualistic, and that learning in HE can usefully be viewed as process which is distributed across the whole community of learners, teachers, contexts and practices, rather than an a process which occurs within individual learners.

References

Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirschner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives (pp 17-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. O’Donnell, V. L. & Tobbell, J. (2007). The transition of adult students to higher education: Legitimate peripheral participation in a Community of Practice? Adult Education Quarterly, 57(4), 312-328. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Author Information

University of Glasgow
Adult & Continuing Education
Glasgow
University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.