DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT IN IDENTIFICATION OF CHILDREN AT RISK FOR READING AND WRITING DIFFICULTIES
Author(s):
Salvius Alois Kumburu
Conference:
ECER 2008
Network:
5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Format:
Paper

Session Information

05 SES 10, Children and Youth at Risk (Part 4)

Paper Session

Time:
2008-09-12
14:45-16:15
Room:
B1 135
Chair:
Ruth Leitch

Contribution

DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT IN IDENTIFICATION OF CHILDREN AT RISK FOR READING AND WRITING DIFFICULTIES Salvius.Kumburu@abo.fi ABSTRACT The aim of the study is to create and evaluate an intervention program for Tanzanian children with reading and writing difficulties. These difficulties are frequent, but not well understood in Tanzania. The design of the study is a randomized experiment with one experiment and two control groups. For the experiment and the control groups a total of 75 children from grade one are screened from a population of 300 children in a low income urban area in Dar es Salaam. One third of the children, the experiment group, will participate in an intensive training program in Swahili language literacy skills for three months, aimed at promoting the reading and writing ability, while the children in the control groups will have mathematics versus no special program. This paper is focusing on the screening process for identifying the children at risk of having reading and writing difficulties. Earlier research has identified components, e.g. letter knowledge, letter sound knowledge, phonological tasks, reading, writing digit span and reading comprehension which are sensitive in the risk perspective and should be included in the assessment. The plan is to use dynamic assessment for the identification, as it is expected to be more reliable than traditional screening tests, when the children in focus probably have a background of low stimulation for reading and writing. With the traditional screening tests it is most likely that many children, who have not been exposed to language stimulating activities at home would be classified as children at risk. It is believed that we could avoid at least part of the problem by using a dynamic approach. In Tanzania most of the school classes have a big number of children and consequently most of the activities can not be planned to be carried out directly on individual level. The idea in this study is then to try to develop and adapt the dynamic assessment in a group approach. The paper presents thus the group based dynamic assessment, the experiences, the usefulness and the results. Descriptors: intervention dynamic assessment children at risk reading writing

Method

A. Identification: Train-Pre-test-Train -Post -test ( With group test) B. Itervention: Experimental design. Randomized experiment. R o1 X 01, 2 R 01 X 01, 2 R 01 01, 2 01=pre-test, 2another post test. X1=intervention.X2= parallel program, -No special program R=random assignment to the three groups. Instruments:Inetrview Questions, test battery, notebook, reading cards (Swahili language)

Expected Outcomes

The dynamic assessment approach might prove to be most useful in identifying children at risk of having reading and writing difficulties in Tanzania.

References

References: Blatchford, P. (2003). Class size Debate: Is small size Better? McGraw-Hill Education Publisher. Blchman, B., et al. (2000). Road to the code. A phonological Awareness program for young Children. Paul H. Brookes publishing co. Bradley & Bryant, (1983). Sound categorization by rhyme. In Blachman B.A., Wynme, E. Black, R.M.S., & Tangel, D.M. (2000). The road to the code. Phonological Awareness Program for young children. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. Block,R. ( 2001). Experimental Research Design, in Johnson, Janet, Buttolph, Richard, A., Joslyn, and H.T. Reynolds. (2001). Political Research Methods, 4th edition. Washington, DC. CQ: Press.http://wwwe.mtsu.edu.-polsu/experimental.html Bumfrey, P.D & Reason, R. (1992). Specific Learning Difficulties: Dyslexia. Challenges and Responses. London. Rout ledge Falmer. Campione, J. C. (1996).A Taxonomy of Approaches and an outline of strength and weakness. In Harry Daniel (1996). Introduction to Vygtsky. Publisher Rout ledge Chard & Dickson, (1999). Phonological Awareness: Instructional and Assessment Guidelines. Catherine, E, et al. (1998). Preventing Reading Difficult in Young Children. McGraw-Hill Education Publisher. Daniel, M.(2004). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London GBR: Sage Publications, incorporated. P Davis, J. ( 1999). Experimental research methods.http://www.dem.mscd.edu. downloaded on 19.11.2007 Dorothy et al (2002). Supporting struggling readers and writers: Strategies for classroom Intervention. International reading Association, Barksdele road new York Encyclopaedia of Mental Disorders: http://www.minddisodres.com 14.11.2007. Fisher. & Ivey, G. (2006). Evaluating the interventions for struggling adolescents’ readers. Journal of Adolescents and Adult literacy Vol. 50 Number 3.p 180- 189. Graham & Harris, (2005). Improving the writing Performance of Young Struggling Writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on Accelerating students learning. The Journal of special Education vol. 39.number 1.p Graham, S. & Haris, K. R. (2003). Improving the writing Performance of the young Struggling writers: theoretical and pragmatic research from the center on Accelerating Students learning. The journal of special education Hurford,D.P. 8 1994). Early identification of children art risk of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 27(6) p 371-382 Huitt, W. (2003). Assessment, measurement, evaluation, and research. Types of studies in scientific research educational psychology.Valdosat state University. USA. Jerkins, J.R. & O’Connor, R.E., (2000). Early identification and intervention for young children with Reading/ Learning Disabilities University of Washington Leinen, T.O. (2006). Improving the writing Performance of Struggling writers in Second grade. Journal of Special Education Vol. 4 Number 2 p. Ministry of Education and Culture (2002). The Basic Education Statistics. DSM. Tanzania. 2001-2004. Ministry of Education and Culrture (1999).National Report Second Draft Education for All: the 2000 Assessment November, 1999. Dar –es-salaam. Neal, J. et al. (1968). Early Identification and remediation of phonological processing deficit in First grade children at risk of having reading disabilities. Journal of learning disabiliiesp167-17 Peter. E. (2003). Special Education and Learning Disabilities Resources. A National wide Rashotte, C.A. et al. (2001). The effectiveness of group reading instruction program with poor Readers in multiple grades. Learning Disabilities’. Quarterly, 24 (2), 119-134. Man, V. (1983). Difficult with Language processing and phonological sophistication to the early Reading difficult. Journal of Learning Disabilities Vol. 40 number 4 Patrizio, E. T. et al.( 2007). Efficacy of an intervention to improve fluency in children with Developmental dyslexia in a regular orthography: journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 409 Number 3 p193-288. Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. ( Eds). (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children, Executive Summary. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. Courtesy of National Academy. Siegel, et al, (2005). Early identification and intervention to prevent reading difficulties: CMEC, Toronto Sternberg, R. J. et al. (2001). Assessing Intellectual potential in rural Tanzanian schools. MAKWANI-partenrship for child development, Tanzania. Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Tam, K. Y. (2006). A reading instruction intervention program for English- language learners who are struggling readers. Journal of special education vol. 40 number 3 p Tergesen, et al. (2006). National Assessment of title interim. In Rashotte,C.A, McGhee, K.S.& Taegesen J.K. (2001). The effectiveness of a group of reading Instruction program with poor readers in multiple grades. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 24(2), p 119-134. United Republic of Tanzania (URT), (2007). Basic Education Statistics in Tanzania (BEST) (2003-2007). United Republic of Tanzania (URT), (1999).National Report Second Draft Education for All: The 2000 Assessment November, 1999. United Republic of Tanzania. 2004b. PEDP National Monitoring Report July 2002 - March 2004, PORALG Uhry, J.K. (1997). Teaching phonological Deficit to young children with phonological processing Deficit: The effect on sight-Vocabulary acquisition: Learning Disability Quarterly Vol. 20 Number, 2 p 104-125. Valerie, et al. (2207). Improving reading outcomes for children with learning disabilities: Using Brief experimental analysis to develop parent. Tutoring Intervention. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis vol. 40 p. 203-221. Wiener, M. & Comer, W. (1967). Reading and reading Difficult. A conceptual Analysis. Journal of Educational Scientific Studies: Harvard educational review vol.42.Number 3. P.Directory. http://www.iser.com RLA carticle, html. May 2004. Weiner. ( 1969). Reading and reading Disabilities: Assessment and Intervention. Human Development and Applied Psychology University of Toronto. Ziolowska, (2007). Early intervention for children with reading and writing difficulties. Reading Improvement Vol. 44, number, 2 p. 76-86.

Author Information

Salvius Alois Kumburu
Abo Akademi University
Special Education
DODOMA
216

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.