Session Information
06 SES 02, Smart Media Use in Classrooms
Paper Session
Contribution
Introduction
It has been shown that competent problem solutions and self-directed learning processes require primarily the ability of learners to estimate their own knowledge and capabilities in a realistic and at the same time positive-affirmative way (cf. results of the SELF Research Centre Sydney; cf. MARSH, BAUMERT, RICHARDS & TRAUTWEIN, 2004). Meanwhile, helping learners acquire realistic and positive self-concepts as well as the ability to be reflective learners has become a predominant training aim of education and instruction. Reflective learning behavior refers to the ability of a learner to control her/his own learning processes (SIMONS, 1992). Learning strategies cover mainly elementary memorizing and heuristic forms of acquiring learning contents (HOFMANN, 2000) and the ability to transfer knowledge. In addition, learning strategies are brought to light in the active selection and structuring of knowledge and learning situations (BAUMERT et al., 2001).
The “Auricle Installation” makes it possible to explore learning strategies that are normally not uttered loudly during a lesson in school (cp. KRAUS, 2006a, 2007, 2009, 2013). Of interest is how listening practices may be enhanced through children’s interaction with the auricle. A first step to reach this aim, the empirical study focuses on the question, how the pupils identify the auricle.
In the year 2006 data were collected among others in Stuttgart and Vaasa. The result of analysis (Kraus 2007) is, that the pupils identified the auricle as a spy, friend, pedagogue, microphone on a stage, as an enemy, a stinking thing, a joyful toy etc. However, within the last ten years digital technologies have developed to a great deal. Today digital technologies are not only omnipresent and the possibilities to edit, to copy and to disseminate digital information have increased. Also a diversity of media cultures, e.g. cyber cultures developed. The use of the auricles by the pupils today certainly has other connotations than in 2006. The pilot study focuses the identification of the auricle by Swedish pupils in 2016.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W., Tillmann, K.-J., Cresw ell, W.J., Plano Clark, L.V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd Edition, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Hofmann, F. (2000): Aufbau von Lernkompetenzen fördern. Neue Wege zur Realisierung eines bedeutsamen pädagogischen Ziels. Innsbruck: Studienverlag Kraus, A. (2013): „Subtexte des Unterrichts“ als ein Schlüssel zu den individuellen Einstellungen der Schüler-innen in der Sekundarstufe I zum schulischen Lernen. In: Carlsburg, B. von (Hg.): Bildungsw issenschaft auf der Suche nach globaler Identität, Band 26 Baltische Studien, 457 - 472 Kraus, A. (2009) „Schulkultur“ aus der Perspektive von 12-13 Jährigen. Ein Vergleich zw ischen finnischen und deutschen Schüler(inne)n. In: Deckert-Peaceman, Heike; de Boer, Heike (Hgg.): Kinder in der Schule. Zw ischen Gleichaltrigenkultur und schulischer Ordnung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialw issenschaften, 193 – 205 Kraus, A. (2008): Kontexte zu meinem Forschungsprojekt “Konstituierende Leiblichkeit als didaktisches Prinzip”. In: Pädagogische Hochschule Ludw igsburg & Pädagogische Universität Samara (Hgg.): Integration von Wissenschaft, Bildung, Kultur: Russland – Deutschland. Materialien der internationalen w issenschaftlichen praxisbezogenen Konferenz. Samara: Universität Samara, 355 – 363 Kraus, A. (2007): Die „Öhrchen-Installation“ – ein Erhebungsverfahren in der Kindheits- und Schülerforschung. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac Kraus, A. (2006): Skizze eines sozialw issenschaftlichen Forschungssettings auf der Grundlage phänomenologischer Methodik. In: Vierteljahresschrift für Wissenschaftliche Pädagogik. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh. 82 (4) 2006, 511 – 529 https://www.conftool.com/ecer2016/index.php?page=showAbstract&print=yes&doprint=yes&form_id=1867&show_abstract=1 2/2 Kraus, A. (2006): Zu medialen Einflüssen auf Habitus und Lernstrategien bei Schüler/inne/n in der Sekundarstufe I anhand von „Subtexten des Unterrichts“ – eine empirische Studie [38 Absätze]. Forum Qualitative Sozialw issenschaft/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8 (3), Art.11, 2006, http://w w w .qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view /286/628 Kraus, A. (in English) A Study of Media Influences on the Learning Strategies of Students in the First Years of Secondary School by Means of “Subtexts”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8 (3), Art.11, 2006a, http://w w w .qualitativeresearch. net/index.php/fqs/article/view /286/629 Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. A. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Marsh, J. Baumert, G.E. Richards; Trautw ein, U. (eds.) (2004.): Self-concept, motivation and identity: Where to from here? Collected papers of the third biennial Self-Concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation (SELF) Research Centre International Conference, Berlin, Germany, July 4-7 Simons, P. R. J. (1992): Lernen selbständig zu lernen - ein Rahmenmodell. In Mandl, H.; Friedrich, H. F. (eds.): Lern- und Denkstrategien. Analyse und Intervention. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 251-264 Weiß, M. (2001): Aspekte von Kooperation und Kommunikation. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.