Mediatics objects in education : a high-level of uncertainty
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 05 B, Language and Media

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-26
08:30-10:00
Room:
M.B. SALI 12, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:

Contribution

 

Media education is somehow « the ability to access, understand and create communications in a variety of contexts (Buckingham, 2006). Critical thinking is indispensable in our information society. There is a lot of research (Piette, 1996, Sarmiento, 1999, Brouwers, 2009) about different mediatic objects at school: newspapers, TV, radio and the Internet but rarely has it aimed at exploring the complex process of education itself. It’s the reason why we wanted to initiate an in- depth study about teachers’ practices in media education. We have worked under a program untitled « classes-presse ». Students in French lower-secondary classes (Grade 8 and 9) received a newspaper every day and wrote press articles on line. During the time of data collecting, I was a teacher and used this program with my pupils. Bulterman-Bos (2008, p. 419) writes : « because researchers are not engaged with students, they do not develop the appropriate tools for perceiving education ». He compares with medical studies : « In clinical research practice, thus, the role of the analytical, intellectual, universal, and theoretical is self-evident, but so too is the role of the normative, the personal, the particular, and the experiential ».

We refer to the « joint action» theory in didactics to describe didactical situations (Sensevy, Mercier & Schubauer-Leoni, 2000; Sensevy & Mercier 2007). Ordinary sessions and interviews (between the researcher and teachers) were videotaped, transcribed and analysed. Gonnet (2001) considered than actuality is an “active agent of education change. We postulate that media education is characterized by high uncertainty level and danger of dogmatic knowledge construction through teacher and/or media influence instead of rational inquiry.

The semiosis process shows situations where uncertainty causes disorientation for students and even with experienced teachers.

The first objective of our study was to make visible different parts of uncertainty. The second objective was to make expressible uncertainty categories.

Afterwards, we have set a cooperative didactics design to better describe and understand the knowledge actually implemented. We have chosen this form of design to differentiate ourselves from the classical pattern denounced by Chevallard, in mathematics, as early as 1985 as underlined by Leutenegger (1999, p.212). «Study the world as-it-should-be to the detriment of the study of world-as-it-is».

Method

We have worked with 8 lower secondary school (collège) teachers of different academic subjects , involved in this educational project entitled « classes-presse ». We designed together sessions dedicated to media education. They have been carried out, filmed and then cross-analyzed. Our methodology is based on multi-grained analyses conducted from the transcriptions and synopses of sessions and collective analysis reconstructed from video recordings. We used a clinical and experimental approach as suggested by Leutenegger (1999). We call « unknow » the insufficent informations for the teacher and « uncertainty » the one for the pupil. Some incertitudes are grammatical, as Wittgenstein specified it, and connected with learning. But others, connected with action, disturb it. To distinguish them, we have to describe knowledge’s situations exactly. We try to tightly lie a Wittgensteinian epistemology, « joint action » theory and a model focused toward uncertainty.

Expected Outcomes

The corpus including about twenty sessions demonstrate than in media education, uncertainty has a high level.More than the third part of oral exchanges time is marked with it. Contractual uncertainties are in greater numbers than epistemic doubts. Morever teacher’s doubts directly affect potential student uncertainties. In such design, we have to take care over epistemic investigation, and still further in media education. Uncertainty is always present in teaching and learnig situations. So, a better knowledge of uncertainties categories seems to be helpful. Teachers have also to learn how to adjust to new situations. It’s possible with a new approach enables us to not only consider the practice in the sole scholarly categories but to take into account the practitioners' conceptualization and actions. It implies a mixed responsibility: « building together mutual aims to a process thought collectively» as Sensevy specified it (2007, p.207).Such arrangement is not without bringing forward epistemological issues.

References

- Bulterman-Bos, J-A. (2008). Will a clinical approach make research more relevant for practice ? Educational Researcher, 37, 412 - 420. - Chevallard, Y. (1985/1991). La transposition didactique : du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble : La Pensée sauvage. - Kerneis, J (2009). Analyse didactique et communicationnelle de l’éducation aux medias : éléments d’une grammaire de l’incertitude. Thèse de Sciences de l'Éducation, Université Rennes 2. CREAD (Centre de recherche sur l'éducation, les apprentissages et la didactique). [en ligne] : http://classespresse.pbworks.com/f/These20092912.pdf - Kerneis, J. (2010, à paraître). Désorientation des élèves et indécision du professeur : deux formes d’incertitude repérées en éducation aux médias. Carrefours de l’éducation. - Lemoine, M. (2005). D’une démarche professionnelle à une démarche scientifique : filiation puis autonomie de la recherche sur un terrain familier. Sciences de l’éducation pour l’ère nouvelle, 38 (1), 109-120 - Leutenegger, F. (1999). Construction d’une « clinique » pour le didactique, une étude des phénomènes temporels de l’enseignement. Recherches en Didactique des mathématiques, 20 (2),.209-250. - Merisuo-Storm, T. & Soininen, M.. Sixth grade pupils reading printed and online newspapers. European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Wien, 28 au 30 septembre 2009. - Nédellec-Trohel, I. (2008). Roles of the researcher in a didactic device. European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Göteborg, 10 au 12 septembre 2008. - Sensevy, G. & Mercier, A. (2007). Agir ensemble : l'action conjointe du professeur et des élèves. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes. - Sensevy, G. Gruson, B., Marlot, C. & Santini, J. (2008). The joint Action theory in Didactics. Introducing the approach. European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Göteborg, 10 au 12 septembre 2008. - Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. London : Harper Perennial.

Author Information

IUFM de Bretagne
Sciences de l'éducation
Quimper

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.