Educational institutions are transitioning towards innovative pedagogical approaches that emphasize developing diverse learning and life skills, enabling students to adapt to a constantly evolving world (González-Pérez & Ramírez-Montoya, 2022). This shift requires moving from traditional authoritarian teaching, where educators serve as knowledge transmitters, to student-centered learning that fosters inquiry, discovery, and skill development (Freire, 2020). Schools are integrating instructional models such as project-based learning, inquiry-based learning, and technology-enhanced education. Implementing innovative pedagogy necessitates systemic organizational change, involving modifications in behavioral patterns, curriculum flexibility, and novel assessment methods (Mamurov, 2017).

Due to structural, political, and sociocultural constraints, the Arab-Israeli education system faces unique challenges in adopting such changes (Reingold & Baratz, 2020). Underfunding, infrastructure deficiencies, disparities in educational services (Vasel, 2023), and teacher motivation contribute to these difficulties (Arar & Massry-Herzallah, 2016). Additionally, the conservative, patriarchal, and collectivist nature of Arab society influences educational practices, prioritizing rote memorization and hierarchical knowledge transmission over inquiry and critical thinking (Da’as, 2017). Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, when schools rapidly transitioned to technology-enhanced remote learning, many retained traditional teaching paradigms (Habiballah et al., 2021).

This study examines the implementation of three innovative pedagogical strategies in an Arab-Israeli school: playful pedagogy, extracurricular learning, and inquiry-based learning. It explores the relationship between cultural beliefs, pedagogical ideology, and educational organizational change, utilizing Fox's (1995) conceptual framework to analyze the interplay between these factors.

Fox (1995) introduced a model describing second-order change in educational systems. Second-order change involves fundamental transformations in values, vision, character, and strategy (Carnall & By, 2014; Kuipers, 2014). To achieve enduring organizational change, Fox argued that six interconnected elements—ideological, human, pedagogical, organizational, spatial, and material aspects—must be addressed.

Literature Review

Educational Organizational Change

Organizational change is defined as a process leading to a transformation in an organization's structure and practices (Graetz & Smith, 2010). Fullan (2007) identified three indicators of educational organizational change: learning materials, teaching approaches, and teacher beliefs. Effective change requires the integration of all three elements.

Playful Pedagogy

Playful pedagogy integrates play elements into instruction to enhance engagement, creativity, and deep learning (Barzilai & Blau, 2014; Pyle & Danniels, 2017). It fosters experiential learning, social interaction, and dynamic teaching (Parker & Thomsen, 2019; Zosh et al., 2017).

Extracurricular Learning

Extracurricular learning occurs outside the traditional classroom, offering real-world experiences (Bamberger & Tal, 2007). It develops communication, artistic, and motor skills (Simoncini et al., 2012), enhances critical thinking and problem-solving (Bamberger & Tal, 2007), and fosters social-emotional growth (Lang, 2021).

Inquiry-Based Learning

Inquiry-based learning encourages active exploration, questioning, and knowledge construction (Caswell & LaBrie, 2017). It fosters teamwork, problem-solving, and knowledge application (Barron & Darling-Hammond, 2008). Variants include project-based (Nilsook et al., 2021) and problem-based learning (Lu et al., 2014; Savery, 2015).

Culture and Ideology

Culture is a system of values, beliefs, and attitudes shaping perceptions and behavior (French, 2015; Kastanakis & Benjamin, 2014). In education, culture influences teachers' perceptions (Hallinger, 2010) and curriculum content (Irvine, 2010; Nakpodia, 2010).

Pedagogical ideology, defined as educators' beliefs shaping their teaching practices (Fives & Gill, 2015; Yakavets et al., 2023), affects their willingness to adopt pedagogical changes (Adov et al., 2020; Al Salami et al., 2017; Bonner et al., 2020; Khanolainen et al., 2024; Ng et al., 2024; Reinius et al., 2024). Researchers emphasize considering teachers’ pedagogical beliefs when implementing educational innovations (Liu, 2011; Sang et al., 2010; Tondeur et al., 2017).

Research Questions

1. What is the relationship between predominant beliefs in Arab culture and partners’ pedagogical ideology in this change process?
2. How did partners’ cultural beliefs and pedagogical ideology affect organizational change?

Setting This study was conducted in an Arab elementary school in northern Israel’s Haifa district, serving 430 students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Key challenges identified were discipline issues, violence, and low motivation. A team of eight teachers developed pedagogical models to enhance engagement, expanding the initiative to academic, social-emotional, and motivational dimensions based on Fox’s model. Ideological and Structural Changes The school embraced a student-centered approach, diversifying teaching methods, granting students autonomy in learning activities, and fostering self-awareness for personal fulfillment. Human changes included collaborative lesson planning, and fostering interpersonal relationships among teachers, students, parents, and administrators. Pedagogical transformations involved professional development, alternative assessments, and adaptable learning spaces. Organizationally, a leadership team was formed, and roles were restructured to focus on innovative pedagogies rather than core subjects. Space modifications included renovated laboratories, learning centers, and an ecological garden, funded partially by parental contributions. Additionally, customary school events were redesigned to emphasize cultural relevance and parental involvement in student progress. Study Participants The research included the principal and all 28 teachers (25 female, three male). Research Methodology A case study approach was employed to analyze long-term educational changes within a socio-cultural context. A mixed-methods design ensured robust data collection and validation, reducing researcher bias through triangulation. Quantitative Tools Two quantitative tools were used. One questionnaire was specifically developed for this study, while the second was based on existing validated instruments. The Cultural Factors and Pedagogical Ideology Questionnaire assessed educators’ beliefs using adapted items from Schwartz et al. (2001) and Kurman (2007), along with selected TALIS (OECD, 2009) items differentiating traditional and constructivist pedagogies. The Educational Organizational Change Questionnaire measured school transformation based on Fox’s model (1995). Both instruments demonstrated strong reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from .66 to .92. Qualitative Tools Observations occurred throughout various school activities, focusing on instructional methods, classroom interactions, and learning environments. These 29 structured observations informed interview and survey development. Semi-structured interviews with teachers and the principal explored personal educational ideologies and perceptions of change. Additionally, three focus groups provided collective insights into shifting pedagogical beliefs. Data were analyzed using SPSS for quantitative findings and grounded theory for qualitative themes, ensuring a comprehensive interpretation of the transformation process. This study tracked the project’s implementation over three years, offering valuable insights into the intersection of cultural beliefs, pedagogical ideology, and organizational change in Arab-Israeli education.

The study findings highlight a strong adherence to traditional pedagogical ideology among teachers, prioritizing conformity and traditionalism over self-direction and innovation. This aligns with research indicating that Arab educational frameworks often emphasize structured, teacher-centered instruction (Oplatka & Arar, 2016). The deep-rooted belief in maintaining established educational norms reinforces the challenge of implementing change without addressing underlying cultural values (Vasel, 2024). Teachers who uphold traditional values tend to resist autonomous learning and student-driven inquiry, reflecting broader societal expectations regarding education. The findings also reveal a direct connection between cultural beliefs and pedagogical ideology, where traditionalist educators show less openness to student-centered learning. Teachers who emphasize conventional values are less inclined to adopt innovative teaching methodologies, highlighting the need for ideological shifts alongside structural reforms (Arar & Massry-Herzallah, 2016). Qualitative findings further illustrate how ethical and religious conservatism, social hierarchy, and gender roles influence educational practices. Many teachers view their role primarily as knowledge transmitters rather than facilitators of learning, reflecting society's hierarchical nature (Da’as, 2017). The status of women in Arab society also affects engagement with pedagogical reform, as family responsibilities often limit professional development opportunities (Cinamon et al., 2016). Resistance to change is particularly evident in the reluctance to implement new methodologies. Teachers with stronger traditional values are more likely to perceive organizational transformation negatively. Conversely, educators with a more flexible ideological outlook are more open to innovative pedagogical approaches, supporting the argument that ideological adaptability enhances receptiveness to educational reform (Tondeur et al., 2017). These insights emphasize the importance of addressing cultural and ideological barriers when implementing educational reforms. Efforts to introduce pedagogical innovation may face significant resistance without actively engaging educators' cultural beliefs. Future initiatives should incorporate targeted professional development programs that bridge the gap between traditional teaching values and constructivist approaches, ensuring a more sustainable and inclusive transformation in the educational landscape.

Arar, K., & Massry-Herzllah, A. (2016). Motivation to teach: the case of Arab teachers in Israel. Educational Studies, 42(1), 19-35.‏ Cinamon, R.G., Habayib, H., & Ziv, M. (2016). The conception of work and higher education among Israeli Arab women. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 129-140.‏ Da’as, R.A. (2017). School principals’ leadership skills: Measurement equivalence across cultures. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(2), 207–222.‏ Fox, A. (1995). Change as a way of life in educational institutions. Chicover Publishing. (In Hebrew) Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In Toward a sociology of education (pp. 374–386). Routledge.‏ González–Pérez, L.I., & Ramírez–Montoya, M.S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493.‏ Habiballah, S., Bibu, N., & Danaiata, D. (2021). Educational leadership and ICT implementation in Israeli Arab sector: Towards a model of hybrid leadership. Review of International Comparative Management, 22(1), 74–86. Kurman, J, (2007). Unpackaging gross–cultural differences in initiation between Israeli subgroups tradition and control orientations as mediating factors. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 38(5), 581–591. Mamurov, B.B. (2017). The need to prepare future teachers to design a student–centered educational process. Eastern European Scientific Journal.‏ http://journale.auris–verlag.de/index.php/EESJ/article/viewFile/600/596 Oplatka, I., & Arar, K.H. (2016). Leadership for social justice and the characteristics of traditional societies: ponderings on the application of western–grounded models. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(3), 352–369. Organisation for Economic Co–operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. OECD Publishing. Reingold, R., & Baratz, L. (2020). Arab school principals in Israel: Between conformity and moral courage. Intercultural Education, 31(1), 87–101.‏ Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., & Harris, M. (2001). Extending the cross–cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit–Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. Vasel, H.(2023). Arab teachers’ perceptions of online learning and technology use During the COVID-19 era: Advantages and challenges. Jami’a-Journal in Education and Social Sciences, 24(2),169-196. Vasel, H. (2024). Differences between Arab and Jewish teachers regarding technology integration in education following their experience with remote online learning during the crisis. Daruna- A scientific, pedagogical and social journal, 50, 72-85