Mathematics education in the contemporary learning environment faces significant challenges. One of the key issues is that students often apply rote approaches to problem-solving without comprehending the underlying principles and logic. This leads to rapid forgetting of the material covered and a diminished ability to apply knowledge in new contexts. As a result, interest in the subject wanes, and mathematical skills remain at a low level. It is crucial to create conditions that foster the development of critical thinking and higher-order skills, allowing students to effectively analyze information and make informed decisions.

The aim of our research is to enhance higher-order skills among students in mathematics classes through the use of methods grounded in mathematical reasoning. We seek to demonstrate how meaningful connections between information can facilitate the solution of practical tasks, which is increasingly relevant in today's society.

Research Questions

How might mathematical reasoning be applied to enhance the purposeful correlation of information, thereby assisting in the resolution of practical problems?

Could enhancement of higher-order cognitive skills be accomplished through the utilization of refined signature problems like Plane Measurement, Spatial Growth, Coordinate Geometry, Mathematics Partner Search, and distinctive tasks aimed at fostering increased understanding?

To understand the importance of critical thinking in mathematics education, it is essential to reference the works of prominent scholars such as Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky. Piaget asserted that the development of thought occurs through active interaction with the surrounding environment. He identified several stages of cognitive development, each characterized by distinct capabilities for abstract thinking. Notably, at later stages, students begin to recognize complex relationships and can apply acquired knowledge in various contexts.

Lev Vygotsky, on the other hand, emphasized the significance of social interaction in the learning process. His concept of the "zone of proximal development" suggests that students can achieve higher levels of understanding and skills when they collaborate and receive support from more experienced peers or teachers. This underscores the necessity of group work and the exchange of ideas within the educational process.

Contemporary research, such as the works of Dan Pingry and John Sanders, supports the notion that employing methods that foster critical thinking significantly enhances material retention. For instance, Pingry's research demonstrated that students who actively engage in problem-solving and discussion of mathematical concepts perform better on tests and excel in tackling new tasks.

The integration of signature problems in mathematics instruction serves as an effective strategy for developing students’ higher-order skills. Signature problems are carefully designed tasks that encapsulate core concepts while requiring students to think critically and creatively. For example, a signature problem based on Plane Measurement may involve real-world scenarios where students must calculate areas in unique shapes, thus forcing them to apply their understanding of geometry comprehensively. Such problems prompt students to analyze different methodologies, compare results, and substantiate their reasoning.

The concept of Spatial Growth presents another opportunity for enhancing students' problem-solving abilities. Problems involving spatial growth require students to visualize transformations and rate of changes, facilitating a deeper comprehension of mathematical principles. Through collaborative investigations of these problems, students learn to articulate their thought processes and construct viable solutions together.

Additionally, employing tasks focused on Coordinate Geometry can aid students in understanding the relevance of mathematics in fields such as computer science and data analysis. The visual component of coordinate geometry fosters a connection between algebra and geometry, thus encouraging students to develop holistic mathematical thinking.

Upon completion of the instructional sessions, both groups were assigned tasks related to functional literacy, which they were expected to complete outside of regular class hours. A link to these tasks was provided to facilitate access and encourage independent study. The design of these tasks focused on practical applications of mathematical concepts learned in class, ensuring that students could contextualize their learning in real-world scenarios. To further assess the understanding and application of higher-order skills, both groups were required to submit reflective journals summarizing their experiences during the sessions and the post-session tasks. These journals encouraged students to articulate their thought processes, challenges faced, and how they applied critical thinking strategies to overcome obstacles. The reflective practice aimed to deepen the learning experience and foster self-awareness among students regarding their learning journey. Throughout the sessions, instructors monitored group dynamics and provided ongoing feedback. This included formative assessment techniques, where students received timely input on their problem-solving approaches and strategies. Instructors encouraged peer-to-peer feedback, which not only reinforced collaborative learning but also allowed students to gain insights from different perspectives. This approach created a supportive classroom environment where students felt comfortable taking risks and exploring mathematical concepts in depth. Additionally, both groups participated in collaborative activities that facilitated discussions around the problem-solving processes. For instance, students were organized into small groups to tackle complex mathematical tasks, requiring them to negotiate and refine their strategies collectively. These collaborative exercises were designed to enhance students' communication skills and promote a culture of shared learning, where they could rely on one another for clarification and support. To ensure that the instructional methodologies remained effective, instructors adapted their strategies based on ongoing observations of student engagement and understanding. Incorporating feedback loops allowed for real-time adjustments to the instructional design, ensuring that all students, regardless of their initial skill level, could benefit from the learning experiences provided. Finally, both groups underwent a post-assessment to gauge their progress and the efficacy of the instructional methods implemented. This assessment consisted of a combination of standardized tests measuring critical thinking skills and practical performance, aligned with the learning objectives set at the beginning of the study. The results aimed to offer a comprehensive understanding of the impact that each teaching methodology had on students’ higher-order mathematical skills and functional literacy development.

Data was collected based on the outcomes of the tasks completed by the students. The performance results were as follows: Group I demonstrated overall higher achievement with scores such as 100% for Student A, 88% for Student B, and 82% for Student C. In Group II, Student A scored 100%, while Student B and Student C scored 82% and 65%, respectively. From the students' performance, the following deductions were made: - Both groups observed that students with advanced subject knowledge exhibited enhanced higher-order skills, demonstrating leadership qualities within their respective groups and critically analyzing all posed problems. - The participation level of intermediate students varied based on the task complexity. Notably, in Group I, characterized by practice-oriented tasks demanding higher-order skills, student B actively engaged and excelled. In contrast, Group II saw the engagement of student B fluctuate based on task intensity; remaining inconspicuous in passive learning tasks and actively participating in tasks utilizing active learning approaches. - Similar observations for student B were noted for student C as well. Group II, the involvement of intermediate-level students was contingent on task types. This highlights the potential of practice-oriented tasks in stimulating engagement among intermediate learners who may not be as receptive to passive learning techniques. Nevertheless, additional focus on advancing the problem clarification phase within other sections is imperative to foster functional numeracy in mathematics. Given that the core issue in mathematics primarily stems from the complexity of topics and the waning interest among students, they struggle to apply abstract concepts to practical scenarios, leading to decreased enthusiasm for the subject. The findings underscore the necessity for further emphasis on the clarification of problem-solving phases across instructional methods to nurture functional numeracy in mathematics, particularly in light of students’ struggles with abstract concepts and declining interest in the subject matter.

1.Piaget, J. (1970). The Scientific Thought. New York: Basic Books. 2.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 3.Pingry, D. (2021). Engaged Learning: The Role of Critical Thinking in Mathematics Education. Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 256–273. 4.Sanders, J. (2022). Active Learning Strategies for Mathematics: Enhancing Engagement and Understanding. International Journal of Mathematics Education, 29(1), 45–62. 5.Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. 6.McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2013). Making Understanding Stick: A Proposal for a New Model of Assessing Learning. Educational Leadership, 71(3), 28–34. 7.Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 8.Larkin, J. H., & Stevens, A. L. (2006). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: A Cognitive Analysis. In B. K. Smith (Ed.), Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 25–48). Hanover, MA: Springer. 9.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM. 10.Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.