The Teacher’s X-factor: A Solution for Teachers Feelings of Professional Inadequacy in Teaching Students with Behavioral Problems?
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Poster

Session Information

04 SES 9.5 PE/PS, Poster Exhibition / Poster Session

Time:
2011-09-15
12:00-13:30
Room:
Seminarzentrum - Posters
Chair:

Contribution

 

Teaching students with behavioral problems is the major obstacle for teachers who apply for inclusive education (Cole, 1998; Meijer, 2003). Teachers of students with this type of special educational needs are at particular risk for experiencing stress in the classroom (Nelson, Maculan, Roberts and Ohlund, 2001; Adera and Bullock, 2010). When a teacher is lacking pedagogic and/or didactic ‘tools’ to act professionally in difficult classroom situations in such a way that diagnosed problems of students can be decreased or solved, feelings of professional inadequacy are said to occur (Edelenbos and Meijer, 2002). In order to design education for every child in its uniqueness, this accretion can be considered as a problem of society that needs to be tackled.

 

It is intriguing that there are teachers who seemingly effortlessly are able to ‘read and write’ with students with a variety of behavioral problems, and that most people promptly agree on whether a teacher has ‘it’ or does not have ‘it’. Through dynamic, reciprocal transactional interactions (Prins, 2003; Sameroff, 2000), those teachers see, affect and inspire their students, increasing the extent to which their genetic possibilities are developed. By preventing behavioral problems from excessing, those teachers do not struggle with the unachievable task of implementing more and more individualized education plans in daily education. Teaching with both their head and heart, those teachers are equipped with the X-factor in teaching students with behavioral problems!

 

A considerable amount of literature has been published on general aspects of teacher quality, for example by Hattie (2003) and Grieve (2010). Recent studies, among which is a European-wide study by Timmering, Snoek and Dietze (2009), point into the direction of personality characteristics as being the major source of variance in teacher quality. Combining the heightened need for research on teacher personality with the fact that teaching students with behavioral problems in particular is the biggest stumbling block for teachers on the way to inclusive education, the main question addressed in this review study of literature is what the personalities of excellent teachers of students with such special educational needs in particular have in common? This purpose is in line with the goals of positive psychology, which are: examine people’s core-qualities; build on the best things in life; make normal life more valuable, and develop talents (Seligman and Csikzentmihalyi, 2000).

Method

In order to present a recent overview of relevant empirical studies in which teacher quality in teaching students with behavioral problems was assessed, a search was performed using the ‘EBSCOhost Complete’ browser. Each study had to: be published between 2000 and 2011; be peer reviewed; be available; contain keywords in subject terms; be written in English or Dutch; focus on regular, special or inclusive education; focus on unaffected teacher’s thoughts, behavior and feelings, and contain convincing empirical data. Of the 428 references found, 5 were usable for this review. The major reasons for rejection were that most studies focused on problems instead of good practice, measured the effectiveness of teaching methods instead of unaffected excellent teacher performance or involved inexperienced teacher students as participants. A review study on caring teacher-student relationships also had to be deleted because conclusions were based on the findings of studies that did not fully match our selection criteria. In order to expand the database without making qualitative concessions, an additional search was conducted using the ‘Dissertation Abstracts International’ browser, which completed our final database with another … studies.

Expected Outcomes

Each personality is made up of characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings and behaviors that make a person unique.The first two are hard to distinguish from another because they dynamically influence one another. Consequently, they are put together in the categorization of found relating variables. The personalities of excellent teachers of students with behavioral problems appear to have the following thoughts and feelings in common: democratic beliefs; perceptions of intelligence as a fixed entity, classroom differentiation and remediable nature; helpful intentions; internal attribution; perceptions of self-efficacy, efficacy of positive incentives, coping strategies and cooperation with external agencies; perceptions of rewards’ effectiveness and responsibility for the student’s development; respect for each individual student. Further, excellent teachers of students with behavioral problems use: helpful strategies; primary school strategies in secondary education; positive feedback; humor; education for personal development. Although the current results are raw and incomplete, the first drawings on the portray of excellent teachers of students with behavioral problems become visible. However, neither personality traits such as the big five or the actual coping strategies have been researched. Also, a comparison with the personal qualities of excellent teachers in general will be made. Comprehensible, this study will have implications for teacher education.

References

Adera, B.A. & Bullock, L.M. (2010). Job stressors and teacher job satisfaction in programs serving students with emotional and behavioural disorders. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 15(1), 5-14. Almog, O. & Shechtman, Z. (2007). Teachers’ democratic and efficacy beliefs and styles of coping with behavioural problems of pupils with special needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education 22(2), 115-129. Cole, T. (1998). Understanding challenging behavior, in: C. tilstone, L. Florian & R. Rose (Eds) Promoting inclusive practice (London, Routledge), 113-127. Edelenbos, P. & Meijer, W. (2002). De pedagogisch-didactische consequenties van diagnosticeren. Groningen: GION, R.U. Groningen. Grieve, A. (2010). Exploring the characteristics of ‘teachers for excellence’: teachers’ own perceptions’, European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 265-277. Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Paper for the Australian Council for Educational Research, October 2003. Holmes, M. (1998). Change and tradition in education: the loss of community. In A. Hargreaves, Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 558-575). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Meijer, C.J.W. (Ed.) (2003). Special Education across Europe in 2003. Trends in provision in 18 European countries. Middelfart, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. Nelson, J.R., Maculan, A., Roberts, M.L. & Ohlund, B.J. (2001). Sources of occupational stress for teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disorders, Journal of emotional and behavioural disorders, 9(2), 123-130. Prins, P. (2003). Effectiever behandelen tussen ‘nature’ en ‘nurture’. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers, Universiteit van Amsterdam. Sameroff, A.J. (2000). Developmental systems and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 297-312. Seligman, M.E.P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction, American Psychologist, 55(1) 5-14.

Author Information

Svenja Harten-Buttner (presenting / submitting)
University of Groningen
Special Education Department
Drouwenerveen
University of Groningen, Netherlands, The
University of Groningen, Netherlands, The

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.