Session Information
18 SES 08, Parallel Paper Session
Parallel Paper Session
Contribution
The data identified what the children thought about Physical Education, with a view to illuminating and informing current policy, practice and research in relation to the the aims which underpin the national curriculum in England. The children's voices conspicuously absent from discussions about their physical education over the last twenty years, gave a view of the curriculum from the recipient's perspective. Through the vibrancy of their voices, the current staus quo in primary PE is examined, and ways forward are offered as as recurring themes by the childre. In addition to valuing children's voices the research shows that through including the children and democratising the discussion, the children were more than just 'empty vessels', and were able to offer informed views.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Fielding, M. (2008), Interrogating Student Voice: Pre-occupying, purposes and possibilities. Critical perspectives in Education. London: Institute of Education, University of London. White,J.(2004), Rethinking the School Curriculum: Values, Aims and Purposes: London: RoutledgeFalmer White, J. (2007), 'What Achools are For and Why'. Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, 13 (14), 5-49
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.