Foreign Evidence Versus Knowledge Path Dependency? The Example of Two Evaluation Tools of French Schools
Author(s):
Xavier Pons (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

23 SES 07 C, Accountability

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
17:15-18:45
Room:
FFL - Aula 31
Chair:
Nafsika Alexiadou

Contribution

The aim of this paper is to study the mobilisation and transformation of foreign evidence by French national evaluators when they have to implement in their own educational system a new policy instrument: evaluation. Two external evaluation tools are particularly analysed which played an important role in the French policy of school evaluation: the collective school inspections led since the middle of the 1970s by high central inspectors “inspecteurs généraux”) and the indicators of secondary schools performance and added value (“IPES-IVAL” indicators) conceived by the statisticians from the central administration of the ministry of education since the 1980s.

The idea is to study knowledge production, dissemination and translation processes all along the implementation of such tools to better analyse and appreciate the forms and the degree of policy change, and more precisely, of foreign influences on domestic policy making processes. Our main hypothesis is that there is a knowledge path dependency in national educational systems. In other words, some choices made about the pieces and the forms of knowledge at the basis of an evaluation tool may strongly predetermine the subsequent forms of new knowledge productions, their institutionalisation making always more difficult to abandon the initial choices.

The factors at the origin of these self-reinforcement processes may be cognitive of course (such as the cognitive properties of the evaluation tools themselves or the cognitive routines of actors) but not only (political, institutional, professional and organisational factors also matter). In that perspective, we assume that foreign evidence can not really reorient this knowledge production, so that it seems difficult to talk about a “transfer” or a “borrowing”. Yet it seems that it provides national evaluators with a cognitive alternative possibility that they can accumulate in a stock of options that they are more or less likely to mobilise in specific policy contexts when their professional identity and skills are challenged.

Method

To do so, we will use materials drawn through two complementary research studies. The first one is a PhD study in political science conducted between 2004 and 2008 on the French policy evaluation in education which allowed us to interview about 98 national evaluators, to analyse a set of public documents, to read the internal news bulletins of the high central inspectors and to analyse the personal archives of some statisticians (Pons, 2010). The second one is an exploratory comparison led with Hélène Buisson-Fenet on school evaluation policy in four European countries (England, France, Scotland and Switzerland). Based on 101 interviews and an analysis of national professional and scientific literatures, it enabled us to cross-check some pieces of information, to better understand some foreign models quoted in France (especially the English and the Scottish ones) and to start to analyse the role of the Standing International Conference of Inspectorates in the dissemination of specific national experiences (Buisson-Fenet & Pons, 2011).

Expected Outcomes

To show this, we will first analyse the kind of knowledge at the basis of each evaluation tool and its evolution all along its conception and its implementation. Then we will synthesize the roles played by foreign evidence in this process and lastly we will point out the reasons of its selective mobilisation by national evaluators.

References

Pons, X. (2010) Evaluer l'action éducative. Des professionels en concurrence. Paris: PUF. Buisson-Fenet, H. & Pons, X. (2011) Les pratiques d'évaluation externe des établissements scolaires en France, au Royaume-Uni et en Suisse. Créteil: Largotec.

Author Information

Xavier Pons (presenting / submitting)
University of East Paris Créteil (UPEC), France

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.