The increasing availability of user-centered contents mechanisms and the growth of social network services have brought a new social demand and changed the way we think, create and learn in present times, all this demands for new approaches to life.

An approach that takes into accounts relationship bounds and that considers individuals’ connections via their social networks. This relationship bound occurs in social dispersed sharing spaces, and usually are formed in very wide multidisciplinary backgrounds between people with a broad spectrum of experiences.

This social capital reinforcement within technological enhanced scenarios accounts on reciprocity to maintain and bind relationships allowing communications that may not have otherwise been possible (e.g. meeting strangers online solely through shared interests, exchange of information in seconds across countries, helps establish identity individual or group) (Putnam, 2000).

This phenomenon also implies the development of strong bound communities, which usually share common desires to progress become skilled and be distinguished (Wegner).

All this requires new capabilities and qualities like the quality of inventiveness, empathy and joyfulness or the capability to detect patterns, provide meaning, or opportunities which eventually helps people to improve their social oriented technological participatory processes. \cite{Pink06}.

Involves as well the development of new abilities and skills like the ability to relate and emphasizes with others, or the ability to understand subtleties of the human interactions or to become multi-tasked or to act equally in starkly different situations and develop expertise in multiple spheres.

In sum, this are environments that demands for a social consolidation which enables the connection of people with corresponding interests, regardless cultural, time or space barriers. 

Scenarios where trust plays foremost and important role, as trust is the key element for supporting and sustain the framework of interactions (Luhman, 2000; Weber, 2003)

Taking into account the previous paragraphs, our aim is to contribute towards this social consolidation practices by providing a comprehensive understanding on assessing the impact of trust in supporting and sustain the framework of interactions, that contributes towards the individual and collective intellectual climate of an online learning environment.

This paper main relevance is then to provide a comprehensive understanding on how to foster people's intentions or desire to share and participate in distance online learning context.

In this paper we reflect, as well on the importance trust in foster the increasing tendency towards a climate where each individual contributes to a collective intellectual climate, rather than the media itself, especially in foster scenarios where online relations and their social actions represent the main feature results, like knowledge transfer based scenarios.

Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1). Dong, Y. (2010). The role of trust in social life. In Z. Yan, editor, Trust Modeling and Management in Digital Environments: From Social Concept to System Development, pages 421–440. IGI Global, Finland. Fukuyama, F. (Ed.). (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press. Lave, L. and Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. In European Conference on Hypertext. Gambetta D. (1998). Trust making and breaking co-operative relations. In D. Gambetta, editor, Can we trust trust?, pages 213-237. Basil Blackwell. Luhmann, N. (2000). familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gameta & B. Blackwell (Eds.), Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2009). The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 13–32. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78. (Online: http://muse.jhu.edu./demo/journal_of_democracy/v006/putnam.html) Pink D. H.( 2008). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. Marshall Cavendish International. Kaendler C., et. al. (2010). Emerging Tensions in the Future of Technology-Enhanced Learning: First Results of an International Delphi Study,” Distribution, pp. 1-5. Kim, A. J. (1999). Community Building on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press, New York, NY, USA. Weber, L. R. and Carter, A. (2003). The social construction of trust. Clinical sociology. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers. Sousa, S. and Lamas , D. (2011). Emerging trust patterns in online communities. In CPSCom, The 4th IEEE International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social.