The Internet has been discussed as a “virtual space” of potential beings: disembodied selves in a digital world of endless possibilities (e.g. Lévy 1998; Welsch 2000). Therefore pedagogical approaches ask for commitments, authenticity and inwardness in online communities. Dreyfus (2002) and Prosser & Ward (2000) argue that for the very absence of these existential categories, education and literacy find their limits in computer mediated communication. But is it possible that the huge influence of online social media networks on everyday life do not play a role in individual subjectivity? Personalisation, social communication and relationships are concepts applied to the Internet in the context of pedagogy. These concepts have led to Personal Learning Environments (PLE), Social Learning Management Systems, online communities of practice, among others. To what extent is the personal and the social – as it is applied to the internet within these concepts – an authentic and existential category or do they have to be considered as inauthentic and illusory?

Dreyfus as well as Prosser & Ward refer to the existential philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard to pose the inauthenticity of online networks. The philosophy of existence, as developed in Denmark, France and Germany, often serves to expose aspects of subjectivity in literacy and learning. Marotzki (1990) allude to Jean Paul Sartre in order to exhibit the acceptance of discontinuity as a property of subjectivity. Bollnow (1977) is influenced by Martin Heidegger in showing that risk and failure belongs to the character of education. But what is the role of the Internet in existential anthropology? Is another approach of applying these categories to the Internet possible?

In consideration of the everyday occurrence of online enriched communities and social encounters through computer mediated communication the Internet seems to play a role in authenticity. Online communities for example can be interpreted as a phenomenon of sympathy (Hölterhof 2012) and sympathy in this case is constitutional for the subject and its basic needs. In this sense the Internet today is not a duplication of apparently existential aspects as “virtual” opposites without commitment or consequences. The authentic self is blended by online communities and one can identify authentic existential aspects. In this sense the present investigation suggests points of contacts between the Internet and existential anthropology and applies corresponding existential pedagogies to educational media and online communities.

Dreyfus, H. L., 2002. Anonymity versus Commitment: the dangers of education on the Internet. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(4), pp.369–378. Dreyfus, H.L., 2004. Kierkegaard on the Internet: Anonymity versus commitment in the present age. Berkeley. edu. http://www.angelfire.com/ks/learning/Dreyfus_on_Net.pdf Bollnow, O.F., 1977. Existenzphilosophie und Pädagogik : Versuch über unstetige Formen d. Erziehung, Stuttgart; Berlin; Köln; Mainz: Kohlhammer. Hölterhof, T. (2012). Soziale Netzwerke im Internet als Phänomen der Sympathie: Eine Verortung von Social Software in Anlehnung an die Phänomenologie und Ethik von Max Scheler. In W. Sützl, F. Stalder, R. Maier, & T. Hug (Hrsg.), Medien - Wissen - Bildung: Kulturen und Ethiken des Teilens (S. 181-194). Innsbruck: innsbruck university press. http://www.uibk.ac.at/iup/buch_pdfs/9783902811745.pdf Kerres, M., Hölterhof, T., & Nattland, A. (2011). Zur didaktischen Konzeption von "Sozialen Lernplattformen" für das Lernen in Gemeinschaften. MedienPädagogik. http://www.medienpaed.com/zs/content/blogsection/6/45/ Prosser, B.T. & Ward, A., 2000. Kierkegaard and the internet: Existential reflections on education and community. Ethics and information technology, 2(3), pp.167–180. Lévy, P., 1998. Qu’est-ce que le virtuel? Paris: La Découverte/Poche. Manheimer, R.J., 1977. Kierkegaard as educator, Berkeley: University of California Press. Marotzki, W., 1990. Entwurf einer strukturalen Bildungstheorie : biographietheoretische Auslegung von Bildungsprozessen in hochkomplexen Gesellschaften, Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag. Welsch, W., 2000. Virtual to Begin With? In M. Sandbothe & W. Marotzki, eds. Subjektivität und Öffentlichkeit: kulturwissenschaftliche Grundlagenprobleme virtueller Welten. Köln: H. von Halem, pp. 25–60. http://www2.uni-jena.de/welsch/Papers/VirtualTBW.html. Schäfer, A., 2004. Kierkegaard : eine Grenzbestimmung des Pädagogischen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.