In Search of Swedish Assessment Culture/s
Author(s):
Eva Forsberg Henrik Román
Conference:
ECER 2008
Network:
23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Format:
Paper

Session Information

23 SES 03B, The Audit Society (Part 1)

Paper Session to be continued in 23 SES 04B

Time:
2008-09-10
14:00-15:30
Room:
B1 114
Chair:
Linda Rönnberg

Contribution

In recent years, many countries have increased their participation in international comparative tests. The outcome of these tests is often used in national debates on education for legitimizing educational (non-)reforms. The aim of our research project International student assessments, national assessment culture and reform history is to develop knowledge about the relationships between international comparative tests and national reform history. We claim that participation in as well as use of international tests both are related to the national assessment culture and the national reform history. This project is designed as a historical-comparative study, comparing Sweden and Germany, two countries with divergent assessment cultures and reform histories. In this particular study - restricted to the Swedish case - we study how different types of journals within the educational field have dealt and deal with assessment issues, including the international comparative student tests, during the last decades. Through discourse analysis we study articles in journals belonging to the sphere of educational research and educational bureaucracy, as well as in journals oriented towards teachers and school practice. Thereby we map discursive patterns in how to address the issue of assessment. To be more precise, we analyse articles from the following journals: Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, Forskning om utbildning, Pedagogiska magasinet, Svenskläraren and Nämnaren. These journals cover either general educational phenomena or school subject specific matters. The conclusions to be drawn from this comparative analysis are still at a preliminary stage. In this study and supported by previous research, we discuss our findings on assessment cultures with regards to three dimensions, which we claim to be relevant in these kinds of analyses. The first dimension concerns what is at stake when assessment issues are addressed: What kinds of assessment are presented and how are they displayed? What is the purpose of the assessment presented and what is presented as a purpose? What types of assessment are included and what types are not? Another dimension concerns the degree of stability-change over time and the degree of homogenity-heterogenity between the different educational spheres. A third dimension concerns the degree of autonomy and dependence in assessment matters, with respect to the different educational spheres. In addition, we relate the patterns of the assessment culture/s to the Swedish school reform of the 1990s, by identifying different legitimating and dislegitimating references in the journal articles to history, science, profession and bureaucracy, and not least references to the international context. By taking all these references in to account, it is possible to put the impact of the international comparative tests in perspective and relate them to other sources of influence.

Expected Outcomes

The conclusions to be drawn from our comparative analysis are still at a preliminary stage. In this study and supported by previous research, we discuss our findings on assessment cultures with regards to three dimensions, which we claim to be relevant in these kinds of analyses. The first dimension concerns what is at stake when assessment issues are addressed: What kinds of assessment are presented and how are they displayed? What is the purpose of the assessment presented and what is presented as a purpose? What types of assessment are included and what types are not? Another dimension concerns the degree of stability-change over time and the degree of homogenity-heterogenity between the different educational spheres. A third dimension concerns the degree of autonomy and dependence in assessment matters, with respect to the different educational spheres. In addition, we relate the patterns of the assessment culture/s to the Swedish school reform of the 1990s, by identifying different legitimating and dislegitimating references in the journal articles to history, science, profession and bureaucracy, and not least references to the international context. By taking all these references in to account, it is possible to put the impact of the international comparative tests in perspective and relate them to other sources of influence.

References

Ball, Stephen, J. (1998): Big Policies/Small World: An introduction to International Perspectives in Education Policy. Comparative Education, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 119-130. Bernstein, Basil (1971/1980): On the Classification and Framing of Educational Know¬ledge. I Michael Young red: Knowledge and Control. New Directions for the Sociology of Education. London: Collier-Macmillan, pp. 47–69. Boesen, Jesper (2006): Assessing Mathematical Creativity. Comparing National and Teacher-made Tests, Explaining Differences and Examining Impact. Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics. Umeå: Umeå Universitet. Broadfoot, Patricia & Black, Paul (2004): Redefining assessment? The first ten years of Assessment in Education. Assessment in Education, Vol. 11, No. 1. Pp. 7 – 27. Chernilo, Daniel (2002): The theorization of social co-ordinations in differented societies: the theory of generalized symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas. British Journal of Sociology, vol. 53, no 3, pp. 431–449. Forsberg Eva (2006): International student assessments, national assessment culture and reform history. A 2007-2009 research project funded by the Swedish Research Council. Nr 2006- 2447. Forsberg, Eva & Lundahl, Christian (2006): Kunskapsbedömningar som styrmedia. Utbildning & Demokrati. Tidskrift för didaktik och utbildningspolitik. Vol. 15, Nr., pp. 7-29. Forsberg, Eva & Waldow, Florian (2007): Cultures of assessment: Historical trajectories and current transformations - International assessment, national assessment and reform history. Humboldt university, Berlin, Neue Perspektiven der internationalen Bildungsforschung: Themen – Theorien – Herausforderungen. Internationales Symposium, 30. November – 02. Dezember 2007. Forsberg, Eva & Wallin, Erik (2006): Skolans kontrollregim – ett kontraproduktivt system för styrning? (The School's Regime of Control - a Counter-productive System of Governing?). Stockholm: HLS Förlag. Jon, Pierre (1993): Legitimacy, Institutional Change and the Politics of Public Administration in Sweden. International Political Science Review, Vol. 14, No 4, No 4, pp. 387-401. Korp, Helena (2003): Kunskapsbedömning – hur, vad och varför. Forskning i fokus, nr 13. Myndigheten för skolutveckling. Stockholm: Fritzes förlag. Koselleck, Reinhart (2004): Erfarenhet, tid och historia. Om historiska tiders semantik. Göteborg: Daidalos. Luhmann, Niklas, & Schorr, Karl Eberhard (1988). Reflexionsprobleme im Erziehungssystem. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Lundahl, Christian & Forsberg, Eva (2006): Kunskapsbedömningar i förändring – utvärdering, betyg och nationella prov. I Eva Forsberg & Erik Wallin (red). Lundahl, Christian (2006): Viljan att veta vad andra vet. Kunskapsbedömning i tidigmodern, modern och senmodern skola. Arbetsliv i omvandling 2006:8. Akademisk avhandling vid Uppsala universitet. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet. Meyer, J. W. (1987). The world polity and the authority of the nation-state. In G. M. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez & J. Boli (Eds.), Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual (pp. 41-70). Newbury Park: Sage. Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2000). The world institutionalization of education. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 111-132). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Posner, George J (1994): The Role of Student Assessment in Curriculum Reform. Peabody Journal of Education, vol. 69, no 4, Our Evolving Curriculum. Part 2, pp. 91–99. Román Henrik (2008): Att mäta eller inte mäta? Utbildningspolitiska bedömningsideologier. (To Measure or Not? Assessment Ideologies in Educational Policy). In press. Román, Henrik (2006): Skönheten och nyttan. Om synen på gymnasiesvenskans litteraturundervisning 1947-1985. [Beauty and Utility. Conceptions of literature instruction in upper secondary education 1947-1985]. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala Studies in Education 113. Román, H. (2003): ”Pedagogiken, gymnasieutbildningen och 1960-talets skolreformer – om reformhistoriebruk och en historia i andra hand”, in Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy. E-journal 2003:4. Internet: www.upi.artisan.se Schriewer, J. (1990). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer & B. Holmes (Eds.), Theories and methods in comparative education (2. ed., pp. 25-83). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Schriewer, J. (2004): Multiple Internationalities: The Emergence of a World-Level Ideology and the Persistence of Idiosyncratic World -Views. In Charle, C., Schriewer, J. & Wagner, P. (ed): Transnational Intellectual Networks: Forms of Academic Knowledge and the Search for Cultural Identities. pp 473 – 533. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. Selghed , Bengt (2004): Ännu icke godkänt: lärares sätt att erfara betygssystemet och dess tillämpning i yrkesutövningen. Malmö studies in educational sciences. Malmö: lärarutbildningen, Malmö högskola. Skolverket (2004a). Internationella studier under 40 år- svenska resultat och erfarenheter. Stockholm: Liber. Waldow, Florian (2007) : Ökonomische Strukturzyklen und internationale Diskurskonjunkturen Zur Entwicklung der schwedischen Bildungsprogrammatik 1930-2000 Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften

Author Information

Eva Forsberg
Uppsala university
Department of Education
Uppsala
186
Henrik Román
Uppsala university
Department of Education
Uppsala
186

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.