Online process based assessment for learning in higher education: dialogue or interaction; engagement or control?
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2008
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 08A, Studies of Interaction & Communication

Paper Session

Time:
2008-09-12
08:30-10:00
Room:
B3 316
Chair:
Andreja Istenic Starcic

Contribution

This paper discusses a study on the development of process based assessment in nurse education in a university setting. Findings from earlier studies show that process based assessment can support constructive dialogue between student and teacher in relation to the subject (Bergström & Granberg, 2007). Dialogue is seen as important in bridging the transactional distance between the learner and the teacher in distance education (Moore, 1991, 2007). This is also seen as a relative concept that is especially to applicable to working in online contexts. In this context dialogue has the purpose of supporting the development of a discursive relationship between the teacher and the learner (Gorsky & Caspi, 2005). The term dialogue is taken to signify exchanges that are facilitative, constructive and positive and is preferred to the term interaction, which as Moore (ibid) highlights can signify relationships that are controlling and manipulative. Given this interest in the promotion of dialogue through the development of process based assessment, a three stage model has been developed for use in online courses in the Department of Interactive Media and Learning at Umeå University since 2005. The aim of this model is to integrate the formative and summative purposes of assessment. The model focuses on students’ previous knowledge at the start of the course, reflections on their experience during the course and finally on their learning on completing the course. The aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of what characterises process-based assessment for learning from the perspectives of both students and teachers. The research questions being addressed in this study are: - How do students and teachers experience process-oriented assessment with both formative and summative purposes? - What power relations can be identified and described between the teacher and the student when students construct their own knowledge in process-oriented assessment for learning? - How do students and teachers experience this culture of assessment particularly in terms of the significance and meaning of ICT? In relation to learning to learn, Boud and Falchikov (2006) argue that in formative and summative assessment the students are the object of assessment and that this must be changed so that students become assessors of their own learning. The uniqueness of online learning lies in its multidimensional forms of communication and interaction which require particular skills in terms of autonomy on the part of the students (Garrison and Anderson, 2003). Furthermore Garrison and Baynton (1987) describes skills necessary for the exercise of full autonomy on the part of the learner in terms of control, power and support.

Method

This study focuses on the experiences of eight female students with previous work experience as nurses and two female teachers who have been involved in using process based assessment. The context of the study was a 15 credit distance learning course at a Swedish university at in nurse education for specialists during the autumn semester of 2007 involving a group of forty four students. Qualitative data was collected from a questionnaire to all students, in-depth interviews with both teachers and also with a sample of eight students. Finally an analysis of the students’ ICT supported process documents was carried out. Data has been analysed from a theoretical perspective based on the theory of transactional distance and initial outcomes have highlighted tensions between dialogue and limited interaction and between engagement and superficial control.

Expected Outcomes

It is expected that the outcomes of this study will be provide insights on the nature of dialogue and interaction in online learning, on the conditions necessary for student engagement and on the ways in which power relations can operate to help or hinder student learning. It is expected that this will contribute towards a better theoretical and practical understanding of process based assessment for learning in higher education.

References

Bergström, P. & Granberg, C. (2007). Process diaries: Formative and Summative assessment in on-line courses. In Buzetto-More (Eds). Principles of Effective Online teaching: A Handbook for Educators Developing E-Learning. Information Science Press Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning (Anpassa) assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 31(4) 399-413 Garrison, D.R. and Myra, B. (1987). Beyond Independence in Distance Education: The Concept of Control. The American Journal of Distance Education. 1(3) 3-15 Garrison , D.R. and Anderson, T. (2003) E-Learning in the 21st Century: A framework for Research and Practice. RoutledgeFalmer: London and New York. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). Dialogue: a theoretical framework for distance education instructional systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 137-144. Moore, M. (1991) Editorial: Distance Education Theory. The American Journal of Distance Edcuation. 5(3). 1-6. Moore, M.G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In Moore, M.G (Eds). Handbook of Distance Education

Author Information

Umeå University
Deparment of interactive media and learning
Umeå
186

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.