Curricular and International Civic and Citizenship Education Study Dataset Analysis of Learning Active Citizenship Through Volunteering: The Case of Slovenia
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Poster

Session Information

07 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2014-09-03
12:30-14:00
Room:
Poster Area E (in front of B001-B003)
Chair:

Contribution

The current debate on citizenship and citizenship education in the European context is defined by the idea of active citizenship. There are two tendencies in this development that are significantly challenging the traditional understanding of citizenship and citizenship education: 1. the change of focus from citizenship understood as a passive legal status to more of a process, participatory and society-oriented citizenship, 2. the change of focus from political citizenship understood as a participation in public or political sphere to the citizen engaging in volunteering activities in civil society and community.

In the recent literature there are three prevalent claims about the interconnection between volunteering and citizenship. Namely, volunteering is said to develop civic values, enhance political participation, and improve democracy (Theiss-Morse andHibbing2005: 230). It is argued that people are more likely to vote, to join political parties, and to participate in the political processes if they have been involved in volunteering (Rochester et al. 2010: 164). Several studies also indicate that young people, while having an antipathy to politicians and formal politics, do see volunteering as a meaningful political activity (Annette 2000: 80). But, on the other side, the studies have demonstrated that volunteering and helping others is a good way to gain mostly the individual benefits such as a personal development, an increase in confidence, greater life satisfaction and self-fulfilment (Janoski et al. 1998; Rochester et al. 2010; Wilson and Musick 2000). While volunteering can further social cohesion, solidarity, social responsibility and community involvement, it does not encourage young people towards political participation. Learning citizenship through volunteering is limited to social concerns, moral engagement and the idea that one should care about other human beings, the environment etc. In other words, volunteering is a way of learning and developing personally responsible citizens, who help the community and others in need, and not participatory citizens.

Thus, at the centre of the idea of learning citizenship through volunteering stands a dynamic and committed individual who is self-reliant and takes responsibility for his or her own actions by following the strategy of blaming individuals rather than paying attention to the broader structures (Biesta 2011: 9–10). Consequently, the explanation of society’s problems is couched in individualistic, psychological and moralistic terms – as a result of a lack of individual responsibility, rather than an outcome of more structural causes (Biesta 2011: 10). The problem here is that volunteering usually starts from private and individual motivations, altruistic and egoistic alike. Political participation, in contrast, is actually motivated by the public interest and the idea of the common good (Biesta 2009: 150).

Therefore, there are two interrelated difficulties arising from the equation of citizenship and voluntary activities. The first is related to the degree to which these private worries or individual interests can be translated into collective or political issues. An additional problem here is that volunteering is not universalistic in the sense of seeking to incorporate the whole population. Rather, the profile of the typical volunteer is well known: they are likely to be above average in education and income, there is a good chance that they will be a parent and active in the church (Janoski et al. 1998: 496). The second difficulty with the individualistic tendency in the idea of active citizenship is that citizenship actions, after all, does not simply depend on what individuals decide to do or not to do, as is the case in volunteering actions (Biesta 2009: 150–151).

Method

Before we draw the practical consequences of these theoretical difficulties of equation of citizenship and volunteering activities for citizenship education, we will focus on the situation in Slovenian education system. From that focus qualitative curriculum analysis is needed, accompanied with some quantitative analysis from IEA ICCS (International Civic and Citizenship Education Study). Our qualitative analysis was focused on three social science syllabuses for elementary and lower secondary schools, namely Society (compulsory in 4th and 5 grade), Patriotic and Citizenship Culture and Ethics (compulsory in 7th and 8th grade), and Citizenship Culture (elective in 9th grade). From the analysis we wanted to know more about the themes on volunteering and community learning- what part of prescribed curriculum they present and the way in which interconnection between volunteering and citizenship is introduced. Our quantitative analysis is focused on IEA ICCS data for Slovenia, regarding the themes that exposed volunteering. The analysis used information from the ICCS Student Questionnaire (ISG), and Teacher Questionnaire (ITG) data file and included only Grade 8 student data and used IDB Analyzer. There were four questions about volunteering in the last international IEA ICCS 2009 study.

Expected Outcomes

Qualitative analysis shows that the formal citizenship education is (still) primarily focused on political participation and political literacy rather than engaging in civil society and community volunteering, which is especially true for our core compulsory and elective subjects in the field of citizenship education. The opposite is true for the subject Society, but it is not surprising regarding the developmental-psychological attributes of the age of those pupils taking it. Our findings revealed that volunteering is not systematically assured in compulsory education in Slovenia, the schools do not require their pupils to volunteer in their community, but paradoxically pupils are more involved especially in a school volunteering activity than their peers around from ICCS participating countries. Surprisingly the analysis showed significantly higher future volunteering to help people in at the local community in Slovenia. On the contrary, the past volunteering activities in general (not just offered by schools) were below international average. Simultaneously, the teachers in Slovenia feel very confident when teaching volunteering. Despite the fact that citizenship education in Slovenia is not focused on volunteering. In teaching volunteering, we should take into the consideration that there is a great difference in the approach when teaching political participation and volunteering. Any talk of political engagement, either of voting or explaining democracy to pupils could always involve some sort of controversy. From this point of view, for most teachers volunteering is a friendly and morally pure alternative to messy, conflict and inefficient politics (Theiss-Morse and Hibbing 2005: 236–7)

References

Annette, John (2000). Education for Citizenship, Civic Participation and Experiential and Service Learning in the Community. In: Denis Lawton, Jo Cairns and Roy Gardner (eds.), Education for Citizenship. London and New York: Continuum, 77–92. Biesta, Gert (2009). What Kind of Citizenship for European Higher Education? Beyond the Competent Active Citizen. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2): 146–158. Biesta, Gert (2011). Learning Democracy in School and Society: Education, Lifelong Learning, and the Politics of Citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Janoski, Thomas et al. (1998). Being Volunteered? The Impact of Social Participation and Pro-Social Attitudes on Volunteering. Sociological Forum, 3 (13): 495–519. Rochester, Colin et al. (2010). Volunteering and Society in the 21st Century. London and New York: Palgrave. Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth and John R. Hibbing (2005). Citizenship and Civic Engagement. Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 227–249. Wilson John and Marc Musick (2000). The Effects of Volunteering on the Volunteer. Law and Contemporary Problems, 4(62): 141–168.

Author Information

Eva Klemencic (presenting / submitting)
Educational Research Institute, Centre for applied epistemology, Slovenia
Ergo Institute, Slovenia
IEA DPC, Germany

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.