Transformative Leadership: Promising Approaches for Educating Impoverished Children
Author(s):
Carolyn Shields (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

26 SES 11 B, Leadership in Post Conflicts and Disadvantaged Contexts

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-04
17:15-18:45
Room:
B028 Anfiteatro
Chair:
Simon Clarke

Contribution

A recent Oxfam report captured the attention of many educators and researchers when it proclaimed that the richest 85 people in the world possessed more wealth than half of the world’s population. In fact, over three billion people—almost half of the world’s population—live on less than $2.50 a day. Children comprise 2.2 billion of the world’s population and one billion—almost half of them——live in poverty. Indeed, according to UNICEF, 22,000 children die each day due to poverty (Shah, 2013). And, although over 120 million of the world’s children never have the opportunity to attend school at all, many others who struggle to attend school on a regular basis find it difficult to achieve academic success, despite the United Nations mandate for free, universal, elementary education. Indeed, almost a billion people worldwide, most of them poor, were unable to read a book or sign their name at the beginning of the 21st century (Shah, 2013).

 

The issue of child poverty is therefore, of pressing interest internationally, and of critical importance to school leaders everywhere who must grapple with the question of how best to educate all children, and perhaps especially those from poverty. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to examine how transformative leadership (Blackmore, 2011; Shields, 2012; Starratt, 2011) can assist educators to transform schools to better support the learning of impoverished students.

 

Transformative leadership (as opposed to either transactional or transformational leadership) takes seriously Freire’s (1998) contention “that education is not the ultimate lever for social transformation, but without it transformation cannot occur” (p. 37). Transformative leadership begins with questions of justice and democracy; it critiques inequitable practices and offers the promise not only of greater individual achievement but of a better life lived in common with others. Transformative leadership, therefore, inextricably links education and educational leadership with the wider social context within which it is embedded.

 

Scholars have identified and written about numerous indicators of multi-dimensional poverty, most of them associated with lack of resources, unemployment, and lack of education. Many of these studies have focused on the nature and extent of poverty in developing countries (Amadio, 2009; Battiston, Cruces, Lopez-Calva, Lugo, Santos, 2013; Gamboa, Waltenberg, 2012). Although lack of education or low levels of education on the part of a head of household are often identified as indicators of poverty, or associated with the persistence of poverty, few researchers focus on how to educate children living in impoverished situations, believing instead that poverty is robust and enduring and needs to be addressed through expensive, long-term interventions and social change. Thus, when children who live in poverty are able to attend school, they are confronted by many barriers: unprepared teachers, misplaced assumptions about children’s ability to learn, inequitable opportunities for access or attainment, unacceptable schooling conditions, and so forth. Moreover, these inequities are indiscriminate: they occur in developed and developing countries, in rural and urban schools, regardless of the dominant religious, political, or cultural norms of a country. Although there is no doubt that policy changes–additional income and employment opportunities, access to sanitary living conditions and clean water, and many other improvements, are desperately needed, research has demonstrated (see Hoffman & Burrello, 2004; Kose, 2007; McLaughlin, 1989; Marshall & Olivia, 2005; Shields & Warke, 2010) that there is much educators can do to ensure that all children receive a high quality education.

 

This paper will therefore combine what we know about children living in poverty with a framework based on transformative leadership theory to examine how educational leaders may address the learning needs of children who come from both generational and situational poverty (Jensen, 2009).

Method

This paper combines empirical research conducted in schools with high numbers of impoverished students, interviews with homeless children and families about their experiences with schooling, with a conceptual analysis and discussion of the responses demanded by transformative leadership. The data come, therefore, from several sources. The first study of 25 school leaders in high poverty contexts was conducted in three stages, beginning with an anonymous survey about their leadership practices. From these surveys, eight principals were selected for follow-up interviews, supplemented by a teacher survey in each school, and on-site observations to confirm the practices reported by the school principals. These principals showed evidence of both understanding and practicing elements of transformative leadership and emphasized their conviction that “without these core foundations [equity, access, social justice, democracy, inclusivity, dialogue] schools will continue to perpetuate past systems which marginalize students.” The second data source is a study in which the authors (Shields & Warke, 2010) interviewed the children and parents from five homeless families and, separately, their school principals and other school personnel, in order to better understand the families school experiences as well as how the educational leaders worked to address the learning needs of the students. Using a semi-structured interview guide, each family’s interview lasted several hours and revealed both how differently each experienced poverty, as well as how differently schools responded to the learning needs of the children. The third data source for this paper comes from the theoretical literature related to transformative leadership and impoverished children (Shields, 2013). For this work, the author conducted a comprehensive examination of both the literature on transformative leadership and studies conducted in developing countries that reported numerous programs and strategies for addressing the impact of poverty on children. Careful thematic coding and data analysis led to the creation of a conceptual framework for school leaders wanting to address the impact of poverty on their school populations.

Expected Outcomes

The data indicated that educators must differentiate between children from situational poverty, which, although often temporary, is usually caused by a crisis of some kind, whether environmental, severe health problems causing particular strain on family resources or well-being, or perhaps by a breakdown of the family unit, again due to death, disease, or divorce. Although many adults experiencing situational poverty may be very well educated and even have engaged in professional careers, situational poverty has a serious impact on the well-being of every family member, creates stress, unhappiness, and disadvantage and has a deleterious impact on the ability of children to concentrate and perform in school as well as on the possibility of parents providing support and assistance for their child’s education. Additionally, children living in generational poverty may have suffered malnutrition and chronic disease, and often have lower vocabulary skills and less general knowledge than their peers in situational poverty. Generational poverty is more persistent and occurs when several generations have been born into poverty and seem to have no opportunities or resources for moving out of the situation. Parents’ familiarity and experiences with the education system generally differ significantly from those experiencing temporary situational poverty. Hence, school leaders must understand the implications for developing inclusive curriculum, robust learning environments, appropriate codes of behaviour, and develop positive beliefs and attitudes that do not send the message to impoverished children that they should either be ashamed of their circumstances or feel unwelcome at school. Key, of course, is the fact that children neither choose to be poor, nor, frequently choose their teachers. Hence educators must ensure that every child receives a high quality education. These are the topics and strategies to be developed in this paper, strategies that will have resonance for scholars in both developed and developing countries.

References

Amadio, M., (2009), Inclusive education in Latin America and the Caribbean: Exploratory analysis of the national reports presented at the 2008 International Conference on Education; Springer Prospects, 39, 293–305. Battiston, D., Cruces, G., Lopez-Calva, L. F., Lugo, M. A., Santos, M. E., (2013), Income and Beyond: Multidimensional Poverty in Six Latin American Countries, In Springer Soc Indic Res, 112, 291–314. Blackmore, J. (2011), Leadership in pursuit of purpose: Social, economic, and political transformation, In C. M. Shields (Ed.), Transformative leadership: A reader, New York: Peter Lang, p. 21-36. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield. Gamboa, L. F., Waltenberg, F. D., (2012), Inequality of opportunity for educational achievement in Latin America: Evidence from PISA 2006–2009, Economics of Education Review 31, 694–708. Hoffman, L. P. & Burrello, L. C. (2004), A case study illustration of how a critical theorist and a consummate practitioner meet on common ground, Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(2), 268-289. Jensen 2009, Teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids' brains and what schools can do about it, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Kose, B. W. (2007). Principal leadership for social justice: Uncovering the content of teacher professional development. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 276-312. Marshall, C., & Olivia, M., (2005), Leadership for social justice, Making revolutions in education, Old Tappan, NJ: Allyn & Bacon. McLaughlin, D. (1989), Power and the politics of knowledge: Transformative leadership and curriculum development for minority language learners, Peabody Journal of Education, 66(3), 41-60. Shah, A. (2013), Poverty facts and stats, in Global Issues, retrieved October, 2014 at http://www.globalissues.org/article/26/poverty-facts-and-stats Shields, C. M., & Warke, A. (2010), The invisible crisis: Connecting schools with homeless families, Journal of School Leadership. Shields, C. M., (2012), Transformative leadership in education: Equitable change in an uncertain and complex world, New York: Routledge. Shields, C. M., (2013), Educating children who come from impoverished or disadvantaged circumstances, modules prepared for the Instituto de Altos Estudios Universitarios, Barcelona. Starratt, J. R., (2011), Preparing transformative educators for the work of leading schools in a multicultural, diverse, and democratic society. In C. M. Shields (Ed.), Transformative leadership: A reader, New York: Peter Lang, p. 131-136.

Author Information

Carolyn Shields (presenting / submitting)
Wayne State University
College of Education
Detroit

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.