The primary school teacher in socialist Czechoslovakia in the era of normalization (1969-1989)
Author(s):
Michal Simane (presenting / submitting) Jiri Zounek (presenting) Dana Knotova
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

17 SES 04, Paper Session

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
09:00-10:30
Room:
B221 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Elena Tabacchi

Contribution

This report is partial outcome of the project. The title of the project is: Everyday life of basic schools in the normalization period as seen by teachers. Applying oral history to research in history of contemporary education.

The era of communism has basically key importance for historical experience of second half of the twentieth century for most European countries, particularly for countries of so called Eastern Bloc. The education, as many other parts of social life, undergone tough time in totalitarian regime. One of the most important periods, in terms of Czechoslovakian history after Second World War, was era of so-called normalization. Time period of rehabilitation pro-soviet totalitarian regime and close-down of all democratic endeavours from sixtieth. The era of normalization is dated back to 1969-1989. 

The education in Czechoslovakia was itself hit by normalization as well. Analogically to political and social development, all reformation activities at schools were stopped and relationships with former West world (countries behind the Iron Curtain) were torn apart. On the contrary, the influence of communist party in education was stressed. Which was seen for instance in making school syllabuses more adequate to ideology of communism, in restriction of teachers´ autonomy work or in prohibition on studying abroad. School is understood as support of socialism, ranking of teachers is stricter (especially the evaluation of political loyalty of oneself to ruling party).

The main aim of this report is to present partial outcomes of research which was focused on teachers´ everyday lives at primary schools (ISED 1 and 2) in the era of normalization as it was experienced by themselves. Particularly we are interested in perception of teacher´s role in society, his possibility of professional growth and his relationships with colleges as well as with superiors. Furthermore, we are concerned about critical moments which occurred in life at school and teacher´s professional life itself. Another question is whether and how teachers faced the regime of normalization.

One of the most acknowledged views on history in present historiography is what we call History of Everyday life (Alltagsgeschichte, histoire du quotidien) which brings a lot of new interpretations of the past. From the point of methodology so-called third generation of historical school of Annales is very inspirational. Main representatives like J. Le Goff or P. Nora emphasise the freedom of human behaviour and usage of anthropological and micro historical approaches. “Anthropologically oriented historiography does not focus only on objective life context (tangible goods, family structure, work, educational institutions) but it stresses the importance of social practise as well. It aims to connect ways of perception with world of emotions and subjective feelings of people who do not act exclusively rationally” (Dülmen, 2002, s. 39). Anthropologically concerned historians try to link these two mentioned areas. Than it is possible to recognize researched topic plastically from many other points of views, which is crucial base for study of socialistic educational system.

Though, modern historiographical methods are not totally avoiding “traditional” methodological approaches, in particular Rank´s school (for instance working with printed sources of official form). It still stays the vital component of methodological tools for general studies (macro historian) like in the case of evolution and change of educational legislation in this report. Most important is the effort of linking different kinds of research methods to make recognition complex.

Method

From the methodological point of view the interpretative approach is the most important one. This approach assumes that construction and perception of reality as well as the integrity come from narrative interpretation. This interpretation reflects subjective appreciation of life events. On the other hand, quietness, proceeding skipping or keeping some events back from life story telling is also subject of oral history. Oral history is then trying to find reason for these phenomena. We see oral history as a series of “elaborated yet still developing and forming process through which the researcher is finding new pieces of knowledge. This is done by oral telling of individuals who were participants or witnesses of certain event, process or period which is explored, or by communication with persons whose personnel experience, attitudes and opinions can enrich the recognition of the researches about people themselves or the problem itself” (Vaněk & Mücke, 2011, p. 9; Abrams, 2010; Thompson, 2000). The method of oral history can also be interpreted like specific kind of heuristic. The main “source” for the authors of report are teachers/respondents who acted at primary school in the period of normalization. There were typically two interviews held with every respondent. The first interview was about biography, respondent was motivated to free storytelling with minimum interventions from the side of researcher. Afterwards the interview was transcribed and analysed so that the second interview could have been prepared. Within the framework of the second interview the exploratory dialog between researcher and respondent was held. This time the topics or events from first interview were discussed so that potential indistinctness can be limited and more details can be found about important themes etc. All interviews were recorded and subsequently transcribed. Acquired data were analysed with two basic methods. The first analytic approach was based on research of life stories of teachers. This process aimed to arrange material to simple short stories (structural analysis). It is a type of open coding which is concentrating on chronologic event sequence. Other methods of analyses were also based on open coding but they were mostly interested in themes of story-telling (content analysis). Authors used not only the method of oral history but also the traditional methods like heuristics and work with sources or some approaches of visual history (for instance analysis of material like private photographs of respondents, private documents, preparations for tuition etc.).

Expected Outcomes

Through the using of oral history, the authors gained unique information about everyday life, private and professional, of teachers from primary school educational level. It was revealed for example that teachers outside of big cities felt the “pressure” of regime quite faintly. For the common target – improvement of school environment - there were even cases of trouble free collaboration between teachers and officials of communist party long with catholic priest. If it was not a direct critique of communist party, we detected that free critique of school system towards superiors who were communist party members was very much possible. In some other cases criminalization of teachers was done to bring the person to jail (for fictional theft of school equipment). Very significant even though expected finding was from field of methodology, that it is rather difficult to obtain interviews with former members of the Communist party of Czechoslovakia. Some of our respondents also sometimes surprisingly did not like to speak about events at school in 1969 when the army of the Warsaw Pact invaded into Czechoslovakia. On the contrary the opening part of this contribution signifies the significant topic of teachers´ lives, and that is the change of school after the event of the Velvet revolution in 1989 with its collapse of communism. To this topic we can count deprecating and denying of teaching methods of “older” professors by younger ones without significant reason. These samples from partial results of our research complete actual general opinion about education and teachers´ work in era of normalization. Our detail cognition of this particular period can among other things be instrumental towards the base for follow-up researches on other types of schools or groups of teachers. It can enable better understanding the school development and change in period named transformation after 1989.

References

Abrams, L. (2010). Oral history theory. London: Routledge. Cach, J. (1991). Poznámky k vývoji politiky a institucí v oblasti školství – léta nadějí, krizí a zklamání 1945 – 1990. Pedagogika, 41(2), 135-144. Čermáková, M. (1991). Formování totalitního školství v poválečném Československu. Pedagogika, 41 (3), 323-333. Dülmen, R. (2002). Historická antropologie: vývoj, problémy, úkoly. Praha: Dokořán. Lenderová, M., Jiránek, T., & Macková, M. (2009). Z dějin české každodennosti: život v 19. století. Praha: Karolinum. Shapiro, S., & Shapiro, R. (2004). The curtain rises: oral histories of the fall of communism in Eastern Europe. Jefferson, N. C.: McFarland & Co. Švaříček, R., & Šeďová, K. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Praha: Portál. Thompson, P. (2000). The voice of the past: oral history. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Vaněk, M., & Mücke, P. (2011). Třetí strana trojúhelníku: teorie a praxe orální historie. Praha: Fakulta humanitních studií UK v Praze. Volná, K. (2009). Prověřená fakulta: KSČ na Filozofické fakultě UK v letech 1969-1989. Vorlíček, Ch. (2004). České školství 1945 – 2000. In E. Walterová. Česká pedagogika: proměny a výzvy: sborník k životnímu jubileu profesora Jiřího Kotáska. (s. 119-176). Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze - Pedagogická fakulta. Zounek, J. (2011). Učitel – Příběh normálního života v nenormální době. In L. Fasora, & J. Hanuš, & J. Malíř & D. Nečasová (Eds.). Člověk na Moravě ve druhé polovině 20. století. (s. 241-252). Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

Author Information

Michal Simane (presenting / submitting)
Masaryk University
Department of the educational sciences
Brno
Jiri Zounek (presenting)
Masaryk University
Brno
Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.