Session Information
13 SES 06 A, The Culture of Education (part 2)
Paper Session, continued from 13 SES 05 C
Contribution
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
References Agalianos, A., G. Whitty, et al. (2006). ‘The Social Shaping of Logo.’ Social Studies of Science (Sage) 36(2): 241-267. Alessi, S. M. and S. Trollip (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development. Boston, Allyn and Bacon. Alexander, B. (2008). ‘Web 2.0 and Emergent Multiliteracies.’ Theory Into Practice 47(2): 150-160. Ankiewicz, P., E. de Swardt, et al. (2006). ‘Some Implications of the Philosophy of Technology for Science, Technology and Society (STS) Studies.’ International Journal of Technology & Design Education 16(2): 117-141. Ashburn, E. A. (2006). Attributes of Meaningful Learning Using Technology (MLT). Meaningful Learning Using Technology. E. A. Ashburn and R. E. Floden. New York, Teachers College Press: 161-179. Barab, S. and W.-M. Roth (2006). ‘Curriculum-Based Ecosystems: Supporting Knowing From an Ecological Perspective.’ Educational Researcher 35(5): 3-13. Barab, S., M. Thomas, et al. (2005). ‘Making Learning Fun: Quest Atlantis, A Game Without Guns.’ Educational Technology Research and Development 53(1): 86-107. Bednar, A. K., D. Cunningham, et al. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link?. Constructivism and the technology of instruction. T. M. Duffy and D. H. Jonassen. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc: 17-34. Bereiter, C. and M. Scardamalia (2005). Technology and literacies: From print literacy to dialogic literacy. International handbook of educational policy. N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood and D. Livingstone. Dordrecht, Springer: 749-761. Bijker, W. E., T. P. Hughes, et al. The Social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press. Bonnett, M. (2004). ‘Lost in Space? Education and the Concept of Nature.’ Studies in Philosophy & Education 23(2/3): 117-130. Borthwick, A. and M. Pierson (2008). Transforming classroom practice: professional development strategies in educational technology. Eugene, OR, International Society for Technology in Education. Bransford, J., A. L. Brown, et al. (1999). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press. Britton, E., B. D. Long-Cotty, et al. (2005). Bringing technology education into K-8 classrooms: a guide to curricular resources about the designed world. Thousand Oaks, Calif., Corwin Press. Brogden, L. M. and A. Couros (2007). ‘Toward a Philosophy of Technology and Education.’ Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin 73(2): 37-42. Bruce, B. C. and M. C. Hogan (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. Handbook of literacy and technology transformations in a post-typographic world. D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo and R. Kieffer. Hillsdale, NJ, L. Erlbaum Associates: 269-281. Bruce, B. C. and A. International Reading (2003). Literacy in the information age: inquiries into meaning making with new technologies. Newark, Del., International Reading Association. Bryk, A. S. and B. L. Schneider (2002). Trust in schools: a core resource for improvement. New York, Russell Sage Foundation. Burbules, N. C. (2000). ‘Why Philosophers of Education Should Care About Technology Issues.’ Philosophy of Education Yearbook: 37-41. Calongne, C. M. (2008). ‘Educational Frontiers: Learning in a Virtual World.’ Educause Review 43(5): 36-38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, Mass., Harvard Business School Press. Coiro, J. (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Taylor & Francis Group. Costa, D. C. (2000). The New Production of Knowledge: A Return to Philosophical Principles. Cronje, J. (2006). ‘Paradigms Regained: Toward Integrating Objectivism and Constructivism in Instructional Design and the Learning Sciences.’ Educational Technology Research and Development 54(4): 387-416. Cross, T. R. and V. E. Cross (2004). ‘Scalpel or Mouse? A Statistical Comparison of Real and Virtual Frog Dissections.’ American Biology Teacher 66(6): 408. Daily, S.B., & Brennan, K. (2008). Utilizing technology to support the development of empathy. Poster presented at Interaction Design & Children conference, May. Chicago, Illinois; http://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/saywhat.html. Davies, D. (2003). ‘Pragmatism, Pedagogy and Philosophy A Model of Thought and Action in Action in Primary Technology and Science Teacher Education.’ International Journal of Technology & Design Education 13(3): 207-221. Dewey, J. (1907). The school and society: being three lectures. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Chicago, Open Court Pub. Co. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, Macmillan Co. Dreyfus, H. L. (2001). On the internet. London; New York, Routledge. Duffy, P. (2008). ‘Engaging the YouTube Google-Eyed Generation: Strategies for Using Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning.’ Electronic Journal of e-Learning 6(2): 119-129. Dwight, J. and J. Garrison (2003). ‘A Manifesto for Instructional Technology: Hyperpedagogy.’ Teachers College Record 105(5): 699-728. Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs. New York; Toronto; New York, Macmillan. Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, N.J., Merrill. Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) ‘Internet Blocking in Public Schools: a Study on Internet Access in Educational Institutions.’ from http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Censorware/net%5Fblock%5Freport/. Elkins, J. (2008). Visual literacy. New York, Routledge. Feenberg, A. (1996). ‘Marcuse or Habermas: Two Critiques of Technology.’ Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences. 39(1): 45-70. Franklin, U. M. (1999). The real world of technology. Toronto, Ont., Anansi. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, Herder and Herder. Funk, J. B., D. D. Buchman, et al. (2003). ‘Playing violent video games, desensitization, and moral evaluation in children.’ Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24(4): 413-436. Gagne, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Garzotto, Franca. (2007). Investigating the educational effectiveness of multiplayer online games for children. Interaction Design and Children: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Interaction design and children, Aalborg, Denmark. Hansen, K.-H. (1997). ‘Science and Technology as Social Relations Towards a Philosophy of Technology for Liberal Education.’ International Journal of Technology & Design Education 7(1/2): 49-63. Hedberg, J. G. and O. C. Brudvik (2008). "Supporting Dialogic Literacy Through Mashing and Modding of Places and Spaces." Theory Into Practice 47(2): 138-149. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (William Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper Torchbooks. Heim, M. (1987). Electric language: a philosophical study of word processing. New Haven, Yale University Press. Hickman, L. A. (1990). John Dewey's pragmatic technology. Bloomington u.a, Indiana University Presss. Hill, A. M. (1997). ‘Reconstructionism in Technology Education.’ International Journal of Technology & Design Education 7(1/2): 121-139. Honawar, Vaishali. (2008). New president hopes to use NCATE as reform lever. Education Week, 28(7, October 8): 6. Hope, A. (2008). ‘Internet Pollution Discourses, Exclusionary Practices and the "Culture of Over-Blocking" within UK Schools.’ Technology, Pedagogy and Education 17(2): 103-113. Howard, B. C., S. McGee, et al. (2000). ‘The Experience of Constructivism: Transforming Teacher Epistemology.’ Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32(4): 455-65. Hutchinson, J. P. (1993). ‘Outlook for the Next Century and its Implication for and Impacts on Technology Education.’ NATO ASI SERIES F COMPUTER AND SYSTEMS SCIENCES 109: 85. ISTE. (2007). Essential Conditions: Necessary conditions to effectively leverage technology for learning. Eugene OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Available: http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS-S_2007_Essential_Conditions.pdf Jacoby, C. (2008). Simple spreadsheets for hard decisions. Long Beach, Calif., City Shore Press. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). ‘Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model.’ Educational Technology 34(4): 34-37. Kellner, D. (2000). ‘New Technologies/New Literacies: Reconstructing Education for the New Millennium.’ Philosophy of Education Yearbook: 21-36. Kytle, J. (2004). To want to learn: insights and provocations for engaged learning. New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Lewin, T. (2008). Teenagers' Internet Socializing Not a Bad Thing. New York Times November 20, p. A20. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/us/20internet.html?_r=1&emc=eta1v. Mager, R. F. (1991). Preparing instructional objectives. London, Kogan Page. Martin, J. R. (1970). Readings in the philosophy of education: a study of curriculum. Boston, Allyn and Bacon. McCrory, R. (2006). Technology and teaching: A new kind of knowledge. Meaningful Learning Using Technology. E. A. Ashburn and R. E. Floden. New York, Teachers College Press: 141-160. McClintock, Robbie. (2000). Experience and innovation: Reflections on emerging practice with new media in education. New York: Institute for Learning Technologies. Available: http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/about/ILT_history.pdf; last accessed November 29, 2008. Mishra, P. and M. J. Koehler (2006). ‘Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.’ Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017-1054. Nesbit, J. C. and O. O. Adesope (2006). ‘Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis.’ Review of Educational Research 76(3): 413-448. Oppenheimer, T. (2003). The flickering mind: the false promise of technology in the classroom, and how learning can be saved. New York, Random House. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, Basic Books. Pearson, T. (2002). ‘Falling Behind: A Technology Crisis Facing Minority Students.’ TechTrends 46(2): 15-20. Peat, M. and Taylor, C. (2004). Virtual biology: How well can it replace authentic activities? Synergy 19: 25-28. Available: http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/synergy/synergy20.pdf#page=28. Peters, M. A. (2003). Technologising pedagogy: The Internet, nihilism, and phenomenology of learning. Simile, University of Toronto Press. 3: N.PAG. Phillips, D. C. (1995). ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism.’ Educational researcher: a publication of the American Educational Research Association. 24(7): 5. Ragan, T. J. and P. S. Ragan (2004). ‘False Dichotomies, Red Herrings, and Straw Men: Overcoming Barriers to Facilitating Learning.’ Educational Technology 44(3): 50-52. Robbie, D. and L. Zeeng (2008). ‘Engaging Student Social Networks to Motivate Learning: Capturing, Analysing and Critiquing the Visual Image.’ International Journal of Learning 15(3): 153-160. Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, N.J., Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. Salen, K. (2008). The ecology of games: connecting youth, games, and learning. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press. Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS). (1991). What work requires of schools: a SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, D.C. (200 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington 20210), Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, U.S. Dept. of Labor. Simon, H. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press. Smaldino, S. E., D. L. Lowther, et al. (2008). Instructional technology and media for learning. Upper Saddle River, N.J., Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Smith, M. K. (2005) 'Elliot W. Eisner, connoisseurship, criticism and the art of education', the encyclopaedia of informal education, www.infed.org/thinkers/eisner.htm. Smith, P. L. and T. J. Ragan (2005). Instructional design. Hoboken, N.J., J. Wiley & Sons. Spector, J. M. (2001). ‘Philosophical implications for the design of instruction.’ Instructional Science 29(4/5): 381-402. Strijbos, S. (2003). ‘Systems thinking and the disclosure of a technological society: some philosophical reflections.’ Systems Research & Behavioral Science 20(2): 119-131. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. New York, McGraw-Hill. Theodore, P. A. (2008). ‘Pedagogy unbound: possibilities for education in an age of electronic communication.’ Journal of Philosophy & History of Education 58: 177-182. Tyler, R. W. (1971). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago; London, University of Chicago Press. Vidoni, K. L. and C. D. Maddux (2002). ‘WebQuests: Can They Be Used to Improve Critical Thinking Skills in Students?’ COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS -NEW YORK- 19: 101-118. Warnick, B. (2004). ‘Technological Metaphors and Moral Education: The Hacker Ethic and the Computational Experience’. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 23(4), 265-281. Westera, W. (2004). ‘On strategies of educational innovation: Between substitution and transformation.’ Higher Education 47(4): 501-517. Whitehead, A. N. (1967). The aims of education, and other essays. New York, Free Press.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.