Non-compliant Theory within the Philosophy of Education? Outlines towards the Potentials of Theoretical Reflection in Educational Research.

Author(s):

Richard Kubac

Conference:

ECER 2009

Network:

13. Philosophy of Education - Standard submissions

Format:

Paper

Session Information

13 SES 01, Educational Philosophy and Policy

Paper Session

Time:

2009-09-28

09:15-10:45

Room:

HG, HS 41

Chair:

Roland Reichenbach

Contribution

Considering the current shift taking place in educational research towards evidence-based research, this paper will discuss the issue of the future relevance of functions and, indeed, potentials of theoretical reflection as such. It was already during the dispute over Positivism in the 1970ies (cf. Popper vs. Adorno, in Adorno 1971) that an all encompassing instance of meta-theoretical reflection for analysis, description and explanation of genuinely pedagogic matters began to recede in favour of a diversification of forms of knowledge (cf. Lyotard 1994, Vogel 1998). Which in turn generated doubts as to a rationality that organizes and unifies as well as in fact radically questions the possibility of non-perspective theoretical views. As a result of that very development the above mentioned evidence-based research claims to juxtapose a strict operational practice of pedagogic concepts against a seemingly unavailable substantial fundament of educational theory (cf. Pongratz/Wimmer/Nieke 2006). Now, it may appear as though empiric ways of approach would make redundant any kind of theoretical reflection. The merit of theory seems, at best, to lie in the inevitable contextualisation of research results, which, however does not yield a high performance. In contrast to this probably dominant yet popular view this contribution offers an approach to theoretical procedures that focuses on the politics of diverse and divergent issues of knowledge and rationality. No longer does it constantly remind one of the necessity of differentiating between such concepts as quaestio facti (context of discovery) and quaestio iuris (context of justification) – an anyway artificial and thus outdated analytical distinction. Bearing in mind that a homogeneous area or intelligible sphere of reason that completely merges or amalgamates empiricism with reflection is no longer imaginable. Therefore what is in question is a resort of reflection which is not submissive to empiricism but rather one that is both open-minded and sensitive towards manifold interpretations, differences, and inhomogenities: from matters of fact to matters of concern (cf. Latour 2004).

Method

The theoretical approach of this contribution is characterized as hermeneutical reflection and critical analysis of concepts of the philosophy of education. The methodological framework is orientated on recent approaches in critical theory and poststructuralist philosophy.

Expected Outcomes

Fully in line with the concept of relentless theory (cf. Meyer-Drawe 1988 and 1989) this paper will introduce an instance of reflection which will no longer be based upon a single and well inaugurated authority of reason and will criticize any detectable weaknesses of empirical approaches. Consequently, it will present a non-compliant theory by nature. This approach will acknowledge its very specific own stance of perspective which in turn has a performative capacity of a daring objection of its own compared to the otherwise invisibly hidden normativity of factualness.

References

Adorno, Theodor W./Albert, Hans/Dahrendorf, Ralf/ Habermas, Jürgen/Pilot, Harald/Popper, Karl R. (1971) [1969]: Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. – Neuwied/Berlin. Couzens Hoy, David (2005) [2004]: Critical Resistance. From Poststructuralism to Post-Critique. – Cambridge/London. Foucault, Michel (1992) [1990 resp. 1978]: Was ist Kritik? – Berlin. Foucault, Michel (2002) [1974]: Die Wahrheit und die juristischen Formen. In: Foucault, Michel (2002): Schriften in vier Bänden (Dits et Ecrits). Vol. II (1970-1975). – Frankfurt am Main, p. 669-792. Hechler, Daniel; Philipps, Axel (Hg.) (2008): Widerstand denken. Michel Foucault und die Grenzen der Macht. – Bielefeld. Koller, Hans-Christoph (2006): Das Mögliche identifizieren? Zum Verhältnis von Bildungstheorie und Bildungsforschung am Beispiel der erziehungswissenschaftlichen Biographieforschung. In: Pongratz, Ludwig/Wimmer, Michael/Nieke, Wolfgang (ed.) (2006): Bildungsphilosophie und Bildungsforschung. – Bielefeld, p. 108-124. Kubac, Richard (2005): Bildung – Eine Interventur vor dem Ausverkauf. – In: Dzierzbicka, Agnieszka/Kubac, Richard/Sattler, Elisabeth (ed.): Bildung riskiert. Erziehungswissenschaftliche Markierungen. – Wien 2005, p. 73-81. Kubac, Richard/Sattler, Elisabeth (2006): Verwobene Ansprüche. Wege der Anerkennung zwischen Bildung und Gerechtigkeit. – In: Wimmer, Michael/Reichenbach, Roland/Pongratz, Ludwig (ed.) (2006): Gerechtigkeit und Bildung. Schriften zur Bildungs- und Erziehungsphilosophie. – Paderborn, p. 105-122. Kubac, Richard (2007): Notwendige Illusionen. Solidarische Anmerkungen zu bildungswissenschaftlicher Kritik in der condition postmoderne. – Würzburg. Latour, Bruno (2004): Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern – In: Critical Inquiry, p. 225-248. Lyotard, Jean-François (1994) [1984]: The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. – Manchester. Lyotard, Jean-François (2004): Die Logik, die wir brauchen. Nietzsche und die Sophisten. – Bonn. Meyer-Drawe, Käte (1988): Unnachgiebige Theorie. Ein Plädoyer gegen pädagogisches Denken im Ruhestand. In: Löwisch, Dieter Jürgen/Ruhloff, Jörg/Vogel, Peter (ed.) (1988): Pädagogische Skepsis. Wolfgang Fischer zum einundsechzigsten Geburtstag. – Sankt Augustin, p. 87-95. Meyer-Drawe, Käte (1989): Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Zerfall oder Befreiung von Vernunft? Merkmale und Konsequenzen postmoderner Rationalitätskritik. In: Oelkers, Jürgen/Peukert, Helmut/Ruhloff, Jörg (ed.) (1989): Öffentlichkeit und Bildung in erziehungsphilosophischer Sicht. Beiträge der Kommission „Erziehung und Bildungsphilosophie“ zur 11. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft. – Köln, p. 63-88. Pongratz, Ludwig/Wimmer, Michael/Nieke, Wolfgang (ed.) (2006): Bildungsphilosophie und Bildungsforschung. – Bielefeld. – Online: http://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-13983/bildungsphilosophie_und_bildungsforschung.pdf [12-10-2008] Thompson, Christiane/Weiß, Gabriele (2008): Zur Widerständigkeit des Pädagogischen. Eine Skizze. In: Thompson, Christiane/Weiß, Gabriele. (ed.) (2008): Bildende Widerstände – widerständige Bildung. Blickwechsel zwischen Pädagogik und Philosophie. – Bielefeld, p. 7-20. Vogel, Peter (1998): Vorschlag für ein Modell erziehungswissenschaftlicher Wissensformen. – In: Borrelli, Michele/Ruhloff, Jörg (ed.) (1998): Deutsche Gegenwartspädagogik. Vol. III. Interdisziplinäre Verflechtungen und intradisziplinäre Differenzierungen. – Hohengehren, p. 173-185. Wimmer, Michael (1997) [1996]: Zerfall des Allgemeinen – Wiederkehr des Singulären. Pädagogische Professionalität und der Wert des Wissens. In: Combe, Arno/Helsper, Werner (ed.) (1997) [1996]: Pädagogische Professionalität. Untersuchungen zum Typus pädagogischen Handelns. – Frankfurt am Main, p. 404-447.

Author Information

Richard Kubac

University of Vienna

Department of Education and Human Development

Vienna

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.

Search the ECER Programme

Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
Search for authors and in the respective field.
For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.