Session Information
23 SES 09 A, New Forms of Governance in School Education (Part 2)
Paper Session continues from 23 SES 08 A
Contribution
As the importance of transnational arenas and actors in governing education has increased over the last decades there has been a growing number of studies trying to conceptualise the ‘soft power’ exercised by these actors. Important contributions have been made in order to understand these new governance practices stated in terms of ‘governing at a distance’, ‘governing by numbers’ and/or ‘governing by inspection’, all of them emphasising that it has to do with governance exercised without legal power. This is also the rationale behind the starting point of this paper. The aim of this paper is not primarily to find a new way to conceptualise these governance practices but to show how these practices in recent years have come to accommodate a growing number of constituents traditionally associated with legal government such as curriculum guidelines and policy instructions. The emergence of a European ‘crisis discourse’ from the mid 00s and onwards is discussed as an important reason why new governance strategies have been developed to strengthen central control over national educational reforms in Europe. Discussing the governance exercised by the European Union in this paper in terms of ‘governing by instruction’ is an attempt to complement rather than replace previous conceptualisations and to problematise the emergence of new forms of central control and direct involvement from the European Commissions in policy making in the member states. In order to follow the process from the EU to the member state level Sweden serves as a national example. The paper draws on two kinds of empirical material, partly on an analysis of central official policy documents produced by the EU and the Swedish government and partly by documents related to the development, communication and implementation by the European Commission of country-specific recommendations, using Sweden as the national policy arena. Theoretically the paper draws on earlier work on Europeanisation in education (Lawn & Lingard 2002; Grek 2008; Grek & Lawn 2009; Lawn 2011; Lawn & Grek 2012) where Europeanisation is understood as a general process towards a strengthened coordination of national educational policies.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Alexiadou, Nafsika (2014). Policy learning and Europeanisation in education: the governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge. In: Nordin, A & Sundberg, D (Eds.) Transnational policy-flows in European education – the making and governing of knowledge in the education policy field. Oxford: Symposium books. Chouliaraki, Lilie and Fairclough, Norman. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Dale, Roger & Robertson, Susan (2009). Globalisation & Europeanisation in Education. Oxford: Symposium Books. Fenwick, Tara, Mangez, Eric & Ozga, Jenny (2014). Governing knowledge. Comparison, Knowledge-based Technologies and Expertise in the Regulation of Education. Grek, Sotiria (2008). From Symbols to Numbers: the shifting technologies of education governance in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 208-218. Grek, S. (2009). Governing by Numbers: the PISA effect in Europe, Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), pp.23–37. Grek, Sotiria, Lawn, Martin, Ozga, Jenny & Segerholm, Christina (2013). Governing by inspection? European inspectorates and the creation of a European education policy space. Comparative Education, 49(4), 486-502. Lawn, Martin & Lingard, Bob (2002). Constructing a European Policy Space in Educational Governance: the role of transnational policy actors. European Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 290-307. Lawn, Martin. & Grek, Sotiria (2012). Europeanizing Education – governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books. Lawn, Martin (2013). The Rise of Data in Education Systems. Oxford: Symposium Books. Nordin, Andreas (2014). Europeanisation in national educational reforms: horizontal and vertical translations. In: Nordin, A & Sundberg, D (Eds.) Transnational policy-flows in European education – the making and governing of knowledge in the education policy field. Oxford: Symposium books. Pépin, Luce (2006). The History of European Cooperation in Education and Training: Europe in the making – an example. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Reisigl, Martin. (2008). Analyzing political rhetoric. In: Ruth Wodak & Michal Krzyzanowski (Eds.). Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Steiner-Khamsi, Gita & Waldow, Florian (2012). Policy Borrowing and lending in Education. London: Routledge. Wodak, Ruth. (2002). What CDA is about _ a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In:, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.