Disability and Adult Life: Timing of Births among Former Students with Special Educational Needs
Author(s):
Jon Olav Myklebust (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

14 SES 03 A, School-Related Transitions Within a Life Course Perspective I

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
17:15-18:45
Room:
103.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Patricia Schuler

Contribution

Introduction

Individuals in their late twenties are expected to establish their own families and have children. This is at least the case in present-day Norway.  However, people with disabilities and health difficulties may have problems in this domain of adult life. This is often the case with vulnerable people, e.g., former students with special educational needs who often encounter difficulties in their transition to adulthood.

This paper analyses which circumstances contribute to childbirth among former SEN-students that have been followed prospectively from their first years in upper secondary school and into their late twenties. Birth trajectories from the age of 17 to the age of 29 will be presented for individuals with different functional levels. The analyses will demonstrate which variables influence whether they have children or not. The plan is also to examine whether the independent variables have similar or different impact for men and women.

 

Theoretical considerations                                                                   

This longitudinal study draws inspiration from life span psychology and life course sociology. The first of these includes the proximal context (e.g., family and social relationships), whereas the second approach includes more distal features (e.g., structural and cultural context). The combination of proximal and distal contexts shape the timing and form of the transitions through which the life course is constructed (cf. Bynner, 2008).

 

The life course approach provides a framework for research that helps to identify and formulate research topics and guides the selection of methodological design. This has definitively been the case in the present research project that started in the mid 1990´s (cf. Kvalsund and Myklebust, 1996). An individual’s life course is affected by past events, is influenced by present opportunities or restrictions, and can often be comprehended on the basis of future prospects. The life course is frequently perceived as the sum of those pathways or trajectories (e.g., in education, work, and family life) that individuals follow through historical, geographical, or structural contexts. An example of such a context is the present structure of special education in upper secondary schools in Norway.

 

Childbirth can be interpreted using life course perspectives, for example, the version expounded on by Elder and Johnson (2003). In the application of this perspective, it is crucial to establish the time and place of the events that are to be analysed. In this study, this relates to how young people with special needs who began upper secondary school in the mid-1990s have children or not in the first decade of the 21st century within the social and economic context of Norwegian society. Another important element is how individuals are embedded in social relationships. The school context is important in this respect, for example, the extent of inclusion in regular classes, or the employment of teaching assistants. A third dimension of this perspective is timing – that is, when notable transitions, for example childbirths, take place in the life course. Sometimes such transitions are off-time (too early or too late), or these transitions do not take place at all (e.g., never having children). Human agency – the ability to plan and to fulfil ambitions – also has a place in this perspective. This ability is characterised by inter inter-individual variation. Reduced agency is common among individuals with serious disabilities, a fact that may decrease their chances of establishing romantic relationships and having children.

 

Method

Methods Studies of trajectories and transitions require a longitudinal design, which is generally a very expensive approach. Presumably, for this reason, most longitudinal studies of adolescents with disabilities have small samples with a restricted time span (see Blossfeld et al., 2009, for a discussion of German longitudinal studies of educational trajectories). Longitudinal data collected prospectively are generally considered to be best for studying processes and outcomes. Using longitudinal data collected prospectively, we may register exactly when various problem conditions appear and what type of support each special needs student receives at that time. For these reasons, a considerable amount of time and money has in recent decades been spent collecting longitudinal data on adolescents with special educational needs in Norway. A research project titled Adult Life on Special Terms provides the data for this article. It is an extension of a longitudinal study that in the mid-1990s started to collect information on special needs students. This follow-up sample belongs to a population of about 2000 special needs students who started upper secondary education in six Norwegian counties in the in 1994 and 1995. During four years, class teachers and school counsellors delivered information about these adolescents at least once a year. During subsequent years these former special needs students have been interviewed by telephone several times. The analyses in this paper are based on a sample consisting of 373 persons who participated in the 2007-interview. Most of them were then 28 to 29 years old. The different waves of data collection have mainly been financed by the Norwegian Council of Research and Volda University College.

Expected Outcomes

Expected outcomes Based on data from this research project, the adaptations to crucial domains of adult life have been analysed, e.g., competence attainment (Myklebust, 2007), employment and economic independence (Myklebust and Båtevik, 2005), spare-time networks (Kvalsund and Bele 2010), and social security dependence (Myklebust 2013). The analyses reveal the significance of a life course perspective, which emphasizes how prior conditions and transitions – in education, for example – influence present adaptation. I expect that this approach, combined with multivariate analyses, will help to illuminate which circumstances affect childbirth among vulnerable people approaching their thirties.

References

References Blossfeld, H.P., T. Schneider and J. Doll (2009): Methodological Advances of Panel Studies. Designing the New National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in GermanyJERO, Vol. 1, No. 1: 10 – 32. Bynner, J. (2008). Developmental Science in the Melting Pot. Journal of Social Issues.Vol. 64, No. 1:219 – 225. Elder, G.H. and M.K. Johnson (2003). The Life Course and Aging: Challenges, Lessons, and New Directions. In R. Settersten (ed.): Invitation to the Life Course. Toward New Understandings of Later Life, 49 – 81. New York: Baywood Publishing Company. Kvalsund, R. and J.O. Myklebust (1996). Nedst ved bordet? Vidaregåande opplæring på særskilde vilkår under Reform 94. [At the End of the Table. Upper Secondary Education on Special Terms during Reform 94]. In J.F. Blichfeldt (ed.): Utdanning for alle? Evaluering av Reform 94. [Education for All? Evaluation of Reform 94] Oslo: Tano Aschehoug. Kvalsund, R. and I.V. Bele (2010). Adaptive situations and social marginalization in early adult life: students with special educational needs. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. Vol. 12, No. 1:59 –76. Myklebust, J.O. (2007). Divergent Paths: Competence attainment among students with special educational needs. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Vol. 11. No. 2: 215–231. Myklebust, J.O. (2013). Disability and adult life. Dependence on social security among former students with special educational needs in their late twenties. British Journal of Special Education. Vol. 40. No.1: 4-13. Myklebust, J.O. and F.O. Båtevik (2005). Economic Independence for Adolescents with Special Educational Needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education. Vol. 20, No. 3: 271–286.

Author Information

Jon Olav Myklebust (presenting / submitting)
Volda University College
Department of social sciences and history
Volda

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.