Group Coaching As Mean To Identity And Competence Building Of School Leaders
Author(s):
Tor Colbjørnsen (presenting / submitting) Marit Aas (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

26 SES 08 A, Feedback and Coaching

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-10
09:00-10:30
Room:
397. [Main]
Chair:
Ulf Leo

Contribution

Abstract    

Identity and competence building of school leaders is an enormously complex process that occurs through interplay of feedback, reflection and human experiences which in this paper is referred to as growth factors. This article reports on findings from a group coaching approach developed for the National Principal Programme at the University of Oslo, which explores the potential of improving the participants’ motivation and competencies with respect to exercise leadership. By using the reflections from the students reported in student texts and surveys prior to and after the programme, we  found that bringing school leaders from different schools together in coaching sessions seems to be a very potent way to build and strengthen their leadership identity, self-efficacy and competences. We argue that many factors contributing to growth in therapeutic groups are the same factors contributing to identity and competence building of school leaders. In this paper we suggest six.

Theoretical framework: A study on a leadership programme offered by a university to support graduates as they moved into new school leadership roles indicated how coaching could contribute to the development of leadership identity (Silver et al. 2009). The researchers found that new principals viewed coaching positively and emphasised it as a useful and unique form of professional development. A similar finding was reported by Robertson (2008). In her study of peer coaching, she found that the participants took ownership of the leadership role, and gained greater intellectual independence and agency as well as political empowerment. These benefits gave the graduates the confidence to improve learning opportunities in their institutions. The participants moved from reactive and isolated states to proactive ones. Close (2013) argued for the development of a conceptual framework for coaches wishing to help school leaders develop political astuteness in their leadership judgments (Close 2013). factors which are especially active in group coaching sessions for school leaders. Theories of therapeutic groups describe 11 different factors contributing to strengthen group members' self-efficacy. Six of these factors are probably also active in group coaching sessions: 1)installation of hope 2)universality 3)sharing information 4)altruism 5)imitate behaviour 6)process learning and process commentary. All these factors are used in our study.

Research question: How can group coaching promote self-efficacy and role clarity in school leadership?

 

Method

This study draws on a mixed methods design and the use of multiple data gathering methods. We used data from the 71 participants which included participants from two different groups that completed the National Principal Programme in December 2013. First, the analysis draws on reflection papers from the participants. The participants were required to submit a written reflection paper exploring the topics of 1) coaching as a source of learning and 2) coaching as part of developing a leadership role. Reflection papers from the students as a data collection tool was deemed as the most appropriate methodological approach to gather data about how the participants experienced the Second, all the participants were asked to provide systematic feedback in an open questionnaire at the end evaluation. Third, all the participants had to answer a questionnaire about the students’ expectations to the programme and reflections about their learning prior to the first coaching session and after the last coaching session. Fourth, after every coaching session, the coaching team at the University of Oslo discussed the coaching process and the discussion was reported in written meeting minutes/research logs.interplay between feedback, reflection and group coaching. The papers were written during the programme, after every coaching session.

Expected Outcomes

Personal Growth: The systematic analysis revealed how the students felt they each gained a better understanding of the individual school leadership role by sharing different leadership experiences and personal preferences. Identity building: The group setting invited the participants to build personal relationships with one another and to challenge one another in constructive and supportive ways throughout the programme. We used six of the 11 categories from the therapeutic framework to discuss how group coaching can promote identity building of school leaders. Installation of hope: Participants in group coaching session share their views, methods and experiences with change initiatives in their school context. These sharing processes install and maintain hope. Both hope related to a fulfillment of their studies implicitly making them better leaders, as well as hope related to transfer of proven and successful experiences, strengthen the confidence and the efficacy of the group. Many participants enter coaching session with the disquieting thought that their challenges, their school context and their school story is unique. Of course, there is a core truth to this notion. But, after hearing other group members disclosing concerns and challenges similar to their own, they report feeling more in touch with the leadership role, or a welcome to “the leadership identity world”. Altruism: In coaching groups, members gain through giving, not only in receiving from others. They are part of reciprocal giving-receiving sequences. Putting together homogenous groups, in which group members perceive themselves as relatively symmetric in experiences and competences as leaders, these giving-receiving processes starts immediately. Imitate behavior: Group coaching members are influenced not only by the other group members, but also by the coach. There is considerable evidence from therapy world that the therapists influence the communication patterns in the group by modeling certain behaviors.

References

Literature: - Argyris, C. 1982: Reasoning, Learning and Action. San Francisco, Jossey Bass. - Bion, W. 1970: Attention and Interpretation. London, Karnac. - Britton Jennifer J. 2009: Effective Group Coaching. Wiley. - Chen, S. and Andersen S. M. 1999: Relationships from the past in the present: Significant other reorientation and transference in interpersonal life. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 31 123-190. San Diego, CA, Academic Press. - Goleman, D. 1996: Emotional Intelligence: Why it matter more than IQ. London, Bloomsbury - Hawkins, P. 2010: The interpersonal relationship in the training and supervision of coaches, in (eds) S Palmer and a McDowell, The Coaching Relationships- Putting people first Routledge, London - Lee, G. 2001: The relationship dimension in management development. Organisations and People, vo. 8 No 3: 32-40 - Liu, Y and Phillips, JP. 2011: Examining th4e antecedents of knowledge sharing in facilitation team innovativeness from a multilevel perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 31 (1): 44-52 - Lee, G. 2007: From personal insight to organizational performance. CIPD, London Zhu, W., Avolio, B.J., Riggio, R.E. and Sosik, J.J. 2011: The effect of authentic transformational leadership on follower and group ethics, Leadership Quarterly 22: 801-817 - Vinogradow Sophia & Yalom Irwin D. 1989: I concise guide to group psychotherapy. American Psychiatric Press, Inc. - Wales, S. 2003: Why coaching? Journal of Change Management, Vol. 3, February, 275-282.

Author Information

Tor Colbjørnsen (presenting / submitting)
University of Oslo
The Department of Teacher Education and School Research
Slemmestad
Marit Aas (presenting)
University of Oslo
Teacher Education and School Research
Åros

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.