Primary pre-service students and Engineering students learning to teach science- a match made in heaven or hell?
Author(s):
Juliet Edmonds (presenting / submitting) Fay Lewis (presenting) Laura Fogg-rogers
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-09
15:30-17:00
Room:
208.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Vini Lander

Contribution

The ‘Children as Engineers’ project brought together 10 primary Initial Teacher Training students and 10 Under-Graduate Engineering students to teach one of ten science based design challenges to 300 children in classrooms using the European ‘Engineer’ materials. The children were aged 10-12 yrs in mainstream mostly state provided schools. The students were given training, resources and support in planning using the ‘Engineer’ curriculum materials. They taught in pairs, one teaching student and one engineer in classrooms culminating in a conference where the children presented their findings to each other. The aim of the research was to create ‘Communities of practice’ (Lave and Wenger, 1991) to develop student teacher confidence in science subject knowledge, develop public engagement skills in the Engineering students as well as providing real positive role models for the children.

This project builds on the EU Framework 7 ‘Engineer’ project which developed curriculum materials and teacher training across Europe to teach science through an engineering context. This was in response to concerns about children’s attitudes to STEM careers (Rocard, 2007) . The ‘ Children as engineers’ project, supported by the UK Engineering Professor’s Council, intends to trial and develop a sustainable model that can used in Higher Education institutions across Europe.

The research will make use of the data to analyse and evaluate the success of the initiative with reference to gender responses, issues of confidence and science subject knowledge, teacher identity with science (Cripps and Clark, 2012) the response to real life role models on attitudes towards STEM subjects (Murphy and Beggs, 2009) as well as responses to the use of the ‘Engineer’ materials to provide a context to science learning (Engineer Project, 2014; EACEA, 2011).

Method

The project used an empirical, mixed-methods, interpretive approach to establish the children’s response to the students, activities and the university students’ own attitudes through questionnaire, self- efficacy scales, surveys, observation, reflective diaries, interviews and collected comments. The project will compare the ‘Engineer’ evaluation data to the project data to explore the differences for the children and students in using Engineering students in the classroom as well as the impact on the students. The presentation will make use of the data to analyse and evaluate the success of the initiative with reference to gender responses, issues of confidence and science subject knowledge, teacher identity with science (Cripps and Clark, 2012) the response to real life role models on attitudes towards STEM subjects (Murphy and Beggs, 2009) as well as responses to the use of the ‘Engineer’ materials to provide a context to science learning (Engineer Project, 2014; EACEA, 2011).

Expected Outcomes

Initial quantitative analysis indicates an increase in confidence of the initial teacher trainees’ science subject knowledge and confidence in teaching science. Qualitative data reveal some interesting dynamics and ways of working between the two experts in their own fields and children’s reaction to the pairing . This raises interesting issues about the transition of knowledge and skills between the university students and to the children as well as issues surrounding personal identity and self efficacy.

References

Bibliography Cripps Clark, J, Groves ,S, 2012, Teaching primary science: emotions, identity and the use of practical activities Aust. Educ. Res. (2012) 39:463–475 EACEA P9 Eurydice, 2011, Science Education in Europe: National Policies, Practices and Research EACEA Engineer(2014) D6.5 Report on evaluation of project’s impact. Accessed at http://www.engineer-project.eu/public-deliverables/index.html Lave, J., & Wenger, E. , 1991, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press. Murphy, C and Beggs, J (2003a) Children’s attitudes towards school science. School Science Review 84 (308) 109-116 Rocard, M. et al. , 2007, Science Education Now :A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe Brussels. Directorate General for Research, Science, Economy and Society.

Author Information

Juliet Edmonds (presenting / submitting)
University of the West of England
Education/ Science Ciommunication
Bristol
Fay Lewis (presenting)
University of the West of England
Education
Bristol
University of the West of England, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.