Learning Centered Educational Views – Mindset – Intelligence Profile: Student Teachers’ Characteristics in the Carpathian Basin
Author(s):
Renata Anna Dezso (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-09
09:00-10:30
Room:
VII. Előadó [C]
Chair:
Paul Flynn

Contribution

This presentation is an outline of my research findings on professional beliefs and understanding of teaching and learning of student teachers in the middle of their training period in two different countries in the Carpathian Basin: Hungary and the Ukraine. Transition of democratic values in teacher training from a Prussian tradition may be traced in the theoretical framework. Relationship between didactics and other learning sciences (such as cognition and social psychology) is also in the scope of the research.

Gardner’s concept of multiple intelligences (Gardner 1983, 2006, 2014) suggests the existence of eight different intelligences (verbal, logical, spatial, visual, kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal) and claims that particular variations of these intelligences may be profession specific. According to his findings those involved in the teaching profession are typically strong in their interpersonal, intrapersonal and verbal intelligences. Dweck (2006, 2007) claims that our mindsets may be fixed or growth depending on our beliefs concerning intelligence and characteristics. She distinguishes between her categories according to one’s attitudes towards challenges, obstacles, effort, criticism and the success of others. Her researches have consequences in the classroom environment on learners’ and teachers’ behaviour.

The constructivist standpoint regarding the nature of learning and the teacher’s role is a significant marker in teacher education. My professional cradle, the Institute of Educational Sciences at the University of Pecs, Hungary argues for the priority of learning centered approaches in the teaching and learning process – that is to emphasize and to take into consideration the peculiarities, social and individual differences of those involved in the teaching-learning process and the usage of adequate methodology.  

Followed by the theoretical investigation of the American authors named above (Dezso 2012, 2014) I was wondering whether we may trace the characteristics of fixed and growth mindset of student teachers in Eastern Europe along the same criteria as those in the United States. Also I intended to find out if student teachers’ mindsets in this region are anyhow related to their views on the teaching and learning process. Last but not least I wanted to find out if student teachers’ intelligence profile is similar to the one described by Gardner and whether these intelligences correlate to the educational views of student teachers in Eastern Europe.

The research was realized in the frames of TÁMOP 4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001 “National Excellence Program – Elaborating and operating an inland researcher personal support system.” The project was subsidized by the European Union and co-financed by the European Social Fund in 2013 and 2014.

Method

Students of the University of Pecs, Hungary and those of the Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian Institute, Berehove, Ukraine participated in the survey. After testing the questionnaire in October 2013 they filled in the same questionnaire of 100 items: questions that measure separate variables, and those aggregated into scale and index. Dichotomus, nominal-polytomous and ordinal polytomous questions were equally implied. Ten percent of the institutions’ student teachers were represented in both cases, respondents overrepresented in the middle of their study period as I intended to investigate views in progress. Paper and pencil administration took place in mid November 2013 in Berehove and the same in mid March 2014 in Pecs. Respondents filled in a code page each containing their answers that were recorded and processed in SPSS 14.0 software. Processing the data I used the techniques of factor analysis, ANOVA, paired T-test, intraclass and rank correlation. Data process was finalized in late November 2014.

Expected Outcomes

According to my findings the characteristics of the two examined groups are different: As for the student teachers in Pecs, Hungary their mindset factor is culture and profession specific: they have growth mindset as they believe intelligence and characteristics may be improved and developed although their reactions to challenges and the success of others’ differ from the model described by Dweck. We cannot conclude valid statements regarding the correlations of growth mindset and learning centered education that may be due to the lack of teaching experience or the training structure of student teachers at the actual phase of their career. Career orientation and intrapersonal intelligence have strong, positive connection (p=0,001) that echoes Gardner’s findings concerning profession specific intelligence profile. Regarding student teachers in Berehove, Ukraine their mindset factor differs from that of their counterparts in Hungary. Those with growth mindset behave according to Dweck’s model in the case of challenges although their reaction to the success of others or effort is atypical of their mindset. There is positive and weak correlation (p=0,000, r=0,188) between growth mindset and learning centered educational views. Learning centered educational views and interpersonal intelligence may be linked together most typically (p=0,002, r=0,467). Bearing in mind the representation barriers of the research we may conclude that validity of the American theories examined in our sample may be traced in Eastern Europe as well. Gardner’s profession specific intelligence profile was partly justified both in Hungary and in the Ukraine. The validity of Dweck’s mindset theory may also be traced in both Eastern European countries, although at this part of the world even those with growth mindset struggle with challenges, efforts and the success of others – possible markers of democratic transition. Growth mindset goes together with learning centered education and interpersonal intelligence among student teachers in Berehove, Ukraine.

References

1. Dezső, R. A. (2012): Termékeny tudatú, kedvesen követelő tanármodell. (Growth Mindset - Warm Demander Teacher Model) In: Fóris-Ferenczi R. – Demény P. (Eds.) Interaktív eszközök és módszerek a tanulási folyamatban. (Interactive Instruments and Methods in the Process of Learning) Kolozsvár: Egyetemi Műhely Kiadó – Bolyai Társaság (Cluj-Napoca: University Workshop Press - Bolyai Society) pp. 27-40 2. Dezső, R. A. (2014): May Each Learn? HERJ 4 (2) 3. Dweck, C. S. (2006): Mindset. The New Psyschology of Success. New York: Ballentine Books 4. Dweck, C. S. (2007): ”The Perils and Promises of Praise”. Educational Leadership. 65 (2):34-39 5. Gardner, H. (1983): Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books 6. Gardner, H. (2006a): Multiple Intelligences. New Horizons. New York: Basic Books 7. Gardner, H. (2014): Mind, Work, and Life: A Festschrift on the Occasion of Howard Gardner’s 70th Birthday. Volume II Cambridge, MA: The Offices of Howard Gardner

Author Information

Renata Anna Dezso (presenting / submitting)
The University of Pecs
Institute of Educational Sciences
Pecs

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.