The Research-Teaching Nexus in Higher Education: how it relates to employability and graduate skills in professional fields
Author(s):
Rita Sousa (presenting / submitting) Amélia Lopes Pete Boyd
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 01 D, Employability and Societal Value of Higher Education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
13:15-14:45
Room:
340. [Main]
Chair:
Jani Petri Ursin

Contribution

The purpose of this paper is to better understand the links between research and teaching in Teacher Education and its contribution to the development of high level skills and expertise required by graduate employees in the knowledge society.

The last few years have significantly changed the relation between knowledge and society. Until recently, much of the knowledge produced in higher education institutions has been decontextualized from societal demands (Santos, 2005). It may be argued that the established approach to teaching in the university does not adequately prepare students with the skills they need to flourish in both personal and professional achievement within the knowledge society. They graduate without the skills required to continue learning throughout life, in contexts of change and continuous innovation (Morgado, 2009).

In this context, higher education cannot be content with transmitting knowledge but must be challenged to create it, promoting the relationship between teaching and research (Zabalza, 2004). The concern with training citizens with social and professional skills for the twenty-first century highlights the relationship between the field of education and the field of research. This leads us to consider current thinking, research evidence and practice in relation to the research teaching nexus and what further research is needed to extend understanding of how it relates to employability and relevant graduate skills in different professional fields.

The nature of the relationship between teaching and research may be influenced by the subject discipline or professional field, by the level of education, and also by the agency of individuals concerned (Taylor, 2008). The role that students play in the teaching learning process may be informed by different models of the research teaching nexus (see Willcoxson et al., 2011; Visser‐Wijnveen et al., 2010; Healey & Jenkins, 2006, Robertson, 2007).

 Research and theory on the research-teaching nexus (RT Nexus) has mainly consisted of studies across research-intensive universities based on the Humboldt tradition (Robertson, 2007). There is a need for research on the RT Nexus in new types of higher education institutions and in professional fields. In addition to the usual focus on students and academics, this research needs to consider the perspectives of other stakeholders including experienced practitioners, employers and professional bodies in the field. It seems timely to extend the nexus to become the Research-Teaching Knowledge Exchange Nexus (RTKE Nexus) so that it acknowledges the use of research evidence and the possible creation of knowledge beyond the confines of the university (Boyd and Smith 2014).

The main objective of this paper is to consider the perspectives of key stakeholders in the professional field of Teaching and Teacher Education towards the meaning and importance of research. These stakeholders include academics, student teachers and school teachers, as well as teachers’ professional bodies and those universities providing teacher education and development programmes.

Even though Teacher Education is a relatively new academic discipline within higher education, it needs to respond to the demands for research that challenge more traditional disciplines, especially since research is viewed as a fundamental feature of the professional identity and work of academics. Also, higher education based teacher education claims strong partnerships with employers and professional bodies and this creates a particular focus on knowledge exchange activity for students as well as academics. For these reasons we believe that Teacher Education is a useful professional field in which to investigate the research-teaching knowledge exchange nexus.

Method

The research design is a descriptive and interpretative multi-case study. This aligns with the intention to investigate in depth particular cases that, despite their specificity, constitute institutional examples of the same research problem. The multi-case study allows us to identify similarities and singularities (Lessard-Hébert, Goyette & Boutin, 1994) in the way teaching and research are articulated in different higher education institutions. The study involves two different Portuguese higher education institutions, one is a polytechnic and the other is a university. The goal is to be able to consider, within teacher education programmes in these contrasting institutions and with schools, the enabling factors and obstacles to the relationship between teaching and research. This is an important starting point for developing understanding of the RTKE Nexus and for identifying strategies to promote such a nexus. In this sense, this research calls for an extensive and systematic review of the literature concerning the links between teaching and research in higher education. The review also considers the Portuguese context, the description of different higher education institutions, and the characteristics and demands of Teacher Education programmes that run in partnership with schools. Within this phase of the research work, we intend to develop and enhance theoretical knowledge of the RTKE Nexus that will help to shape its conceptual framework. Data were collected through focus group discussions conducted with academics from two higher education institutions, and with school teachers. Conducting focus group discussions allows access to a wider range of opinions and perspectives on the topic under study (Underhill & Olmsted, 2003). Through the prompt questions used in the focus groups we aimed to generate useful rich data whose analysis enhances understanding of the perceptions of the participants regarding the importance and significance of research in relation to teaching and learning in higher education and in relation to the work of teachers in schools. Discourse analysis of a sample of relevant published documents will provide insight into the positions of employers, professional bodies and higher education programs towards research knowledge and skills. Published documents will include employer professional development policies, professional standards of relevant professional bodies and teacher education programme specifications.

Expected Outcomes

Based on early analysis of the initial data and also considering previous relevant research findings (Lopes et al., 2014; Boyd & Smith, 2014; Boyd & Harris, 2010), it is possible to speculate on some potential outcomes. First of all, from the documents analysis it can be expected that research will be a very significant element in higher education policies and programmes. In fact, in the Portuguese legislation the research dimension is referred to as one of the central features of higher education (both in universities and polytechnics) and also as an activity in which academics should be actively engaged. Publishing research and being a researcher are dominant pressures on the work and identity of academics nowadays which we believe, tend to create a dilemma regarding their own identity: being teachers or researchers. The juggling of priorities between teaching, knowledge exchange, research and leadership is part of the life of these academics. In fact, there are frequent complaints about lack of time for research and this tends to suggest a priority given to teaching and other responsibilities before research is considered (Boyd & Smith, 2014). Regarding school teachers, research tend to be mostly associated with academic purposes – getting a masters or a doctoral degree. Also, another objective for school teachers of engaging with research is to understand and develop educational practices systematically. In this sense, it is possible to anticipate that the primary factor that motivates teachers to undertake research is to develop teacher and teaching and, ultimately, provide the best possible outcomes for their students. We consider that researching the RTKE Nexus in the professional field of Teaching and Teacher Education will provide new insights into the links between research and teaching in different types of higher education institutions and contribute to understanding of the value placed on different kinds of knowledge within the professional field.

References

Boyd, P. & Harris, K. (2010). Becoming a university lecturer in teacher education: expert school teachers reconstructing their pedagogy and identity. Professional Development in Education, 36 (1-2), 9-24. Boyd, P. & Smith, C. (2014). The contemporary academic: orientation towards research work and researcher identity of higher education lecturers in the health professions. Studies in Higher Education, DOI: 0.1080/03075079.2014.943657 Healey, M. & Jenkins, A. (2006). Strengthening the Teaching-Research Linkage in Undergraduate Courses and Programs‘. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 107, 45-55. Lessard-Hébert, M., Goyette, G., & Boutin, G. (1994). Investigação Qualitativa - Fundamentos e práticas. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget. Lopes, A., Boyd, P., Andrew, N., & Pereira, F. (2014). The research-teaching nexus in nurse and teacher education: contributions of an ecological approach to academic identities in professional fields. Higher Education, 68(2), 167-183. Morgado, J. C. (2009). Processo de Bolonha e Ensino Superior num Mundo Globalizado. Educação & Sociedade, 30(106), 37-62. Retirado em Maio de 2014 de http://www.scielo.br/pdf/es/v30n106/v30n106a03.pdf Robertson, J. (2007). Beyond the ‘research/teaching nexus’: Exploring the complexity of academic experience. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 541-556. Santos, B. S. (2005). A Universidade no Século XXI: Para uma Reforma Democrática e Emancipatória da Universidade. Educação Sociedade & Culturas, 23, 137–202. Taylor, J. (2008). The teaching-research nexus and the importance of context: a comparative study of England and Sweden. Compare, 38(1), 53-69. Underhill, C. & Olmsted, M. G. (2003). An experimental comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 506-512. Visser‐Wijnveen, G. J., Van Driel, J. H., Van der Rijst, R. M., Verloop, N. & Visser, A. (2010). The ideal research‐teaching nexus in the eyes of academics: building profiles. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 195-210. Willcoxson, L., Manning, M. L., Johnston, N. & Gething, K. (2011). Enhancing the Research-Teaching Nexus: Building Teaching-Based Research from Research-Based Teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 1-10. Zabalza, M. A. (2004). O ensino universitário: seu cenário e seus protagonistas. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Author Information

Rita Sousa (presenting / submitting)
Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto
Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas
Porto
Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto, Portugal
Institute of Education, University of Cumbria

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.