Student Teachers Perception of Teaching Competences in the United Arab Emirates
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-10
17:15-18:45
Room:
VII. Előadó [C]
Chair:
Julia Planer

Contribution

It’s a common practice in teachers’ preparedness for the job to involve field experiences, where student teachers provisionally work at schools and deliver actual lessons to real life learners ("The Design of Teacher Education Programs," 2005). To this day, such exposure to the fundamental aspects of the teaching job such as interaction with learners and lesson planning, falls short from preparing teachers adequately to a real teaching context with its interwoven and growing responsibilities and obligations (Southgate, Reynolds, & Howley, 2013). In today’s life, teachers’ engagement in activities outside classroom is equally important to classroom activities. Besides teaching, teachers are encouraged to cooperate effectively with peers, contribute to different intraschool and interschool activities and build a sound parent-teacher relationship, to name but some of the modern demands of teaching (Zeichner, 2010). These expectations are broadly referred to as ‘knowledge, skills and values’ of teaching (Karen Swabey, 2010) and specifically as ‘teaching standards’ and ‘teaching competencies or competences’ (OECD, 2013). 

In line with the international trend, largely known as ‘back to schools’ movement (Ronfeldt & Reininger, 2012), all three teacher education colleges in the United Arab Emirates have incorporated advanced school-based courses into their teacher education programs. In the past, the major problem with teaching in the UAE was the unfamiliarity with the modern pedagogical models, whereas obtaining intensive knowledge of the subject content was the anchor of teaching institutions. Student teachers would spend a large proportion of their studies learning the bases of the subject that they are expected to teach, not how the subject should be taught or how to adapt its content to the context. Unalike most countries, the problem with teaching in the UAE, in particular, is of two folds; shortage of national teachers as the majority of teachers are expatriates (Tim Martin, 2008) and the quality of teaching. This study tackles one aspect of the latter; the preparedness level that student teachers acquire during field-training. 

Taking in account previous work in this area, we hypothesise that the perception of teaching and its related competences may determine new teachers’ level of readiness for the job (Jeanne M. Allen 2013). Also, we will test the probability of identifying different levels of new teachers’ readiness for the job as a consequence to the variation of practical approaches between different teacher education institutions (“The Design of Teacher Education Programs,” 2005; Ronfeldt & Reninger, 2012).

By conducting surveys, each participant in the study, was asked to fill out a ‘readiness for the job Likert scale’ to reflect the key competences based on their personal experiences and individual views. The study looks into providing evidence-based data on the nature of teaching competences in the context of the government institutions in the UAE and to what extent they are dealt with in teacher education programs. Most importantly, it explores the fundamental competences that underpin the curricula of teacher education in the UAE; it provides information as how those competences are introduced, implemented and modelled to student teachers. We will try to establish a link between the attainment of such competences and the level of readiness for teaching (Karen Swabey, 2010). The significance of this project lies in that no study up to date, in the UAE, has anticipated the performance of soon-to-be teachers in view of pursuing teaching competences.

Method

a. Research Questions The study was guided by the following question: - What is the student teachers’ perception of teaching competences, in terms of their significance to teaching, compatibility and mastery in the UAE, against a specific set of competences and as reflected in their understanding and their own terms? Further, this question was investigated through the following queries; 1. Student teachers were given five statements to indicate their agreement level against a set of eleven international competences, in terms of; (1) being trained/taught to acquire these competences, (2) the competences were covered in the curriculum of teaching courses, (3) the competences were implemented/practiced during practicum, (4) the competences were modelled by their teacher educators and (5) being confident in mastering these competences, by the time they graduate. 2. Two questions by which student teachers could use their experience in learning to become teachers to suggest teaching competences that they think they are important for any teacher in the field and to identify the teaching competences that are utilised by some teachers in a given short statement. b. Population and sample: Student teachers (STs) Based on the number of student teachers that are enrolled in every year of the teaching programs, the study targeted 50 student teachers from each participating institution. Although, initially attempted to sample only the internship students, student teachers from different years were also included in this study, in consideration to the programs that introduce practical experiences at different years throughout the studies. All students teachers included in the study are females. c. Instrument: Surveys Surveys were administered for the purpose of this study, in order to decrease possible influence on the opinions and beliefs of the study subjects and to eliminate personal interference in interpretation of the data. Hence, at this stage we refrained from observing any on-site experience for student teachers whether at teacher colleges or at schools. The use of surveys in this study is modelled based on a number of short-terms and longitudinal studies, mainly the ‘Teachers for a New Era’ by Boston College; an ongoing project since 2008.

Expected Outcomes

Participants were asked to anticipate their readiness level to teach after graduation. 68% indicated that they are ready or totally ready to teach once they graduate. In response to identifying the teaching competences that they deal with in theory and practice and their capacities on a Likert scale, an obvious shift was observed from the focus on the ‘knowledge of the curriculum and subject matter’ (in the past) towards child-centre education (today). They identified competences such as ‘instructional planning and strategies’ and ‘effective use of teaching materials to facilitate the learning of all students’ as the most dealt with in. In general, participants indicated a larger weight on dealing with the competences in practice at placement schools as oppose to the theoretical learning of the same competences at teacher education institutions, specifically the ‘knowledge of the curriculum and subject matter’. Where participants were asked to suggest the most important teaching competences that need to be built in every student teacher in order for them to perform efficiently in the future, although a set of 11 competences was available as a reference in the survey, on average, participants could suggest only three competences. Similarly, the majority of the participants could identify teaching competences that were used by a teacher in a given statement, but they could not explicitly write them in their own terms. Generally, participants, although confident about teaching, acknowledged their need to learn more about the content of the subject that they are expected to teach besides learning how to teach it. The current shift in the approach of teacher education in the UAE to prepare their graduates to teach resulted in teachers that are competent in teaching methods and style and less competent in the knowledge of the subject per se.

References

- Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The New Teacher Education: For Better or for Worse? Educational Researcher, 34(7), 3-17. doi: 10.3102/0013189x034007003 - . The Design of Teacher Education Programs. (2005). In L. Darling-Hammond & K. Hammerness (Eds.), Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. USA: Jossey Bass. - Gaad, E., Arif, M., & Scott, F. (2006). Systems analysis of the UAE education system. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(4), 291-303. doi: 10.1108/09513540610665405 - Grasha, A. E. (2002). Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching & Learning Styles. San Bernadino, CA, USA: Alliance Publishers. - Jeanne M. Allen, A. A., David Turner. (2013). How School and University Supervising Staff Perceive the Pre-Service Teacher Education Practicum: A Comparative Study. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 107-128. - Karen Swabey, G. C., Dawn Penny. (2010). Meeting the standards? Exploring preparedness for teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 29-46. - Michael Barber, M. M. (2007). How the world's best-performing school systems came out on top. - OECD. (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD indicators. - Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. - Ronfeldt, M., & Reininger, M. (2012). More or better student teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1091-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.003 - Southgate, E., Reynolds, R., & Howley, P. (2013). Professional experience as a wicked problem in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.005 - Tait, M. (2008). Resilience as a Contributor to Novice Teacher Success, Commitment, and Retention. Teacher Education Quarterly, Fall 2008, 57-75. - Tarman, B. (2012). Prospective Teachers’ Beliefs and Perceptions about Teaching as a Profession. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(3), 1964-1973. - Tim Martin, M. O. b. (2008). Local needs, external requirements: Balancing the needs of a country’s educational system with the requirements of international recognition. Abu Dhabi, UAE: HCT. - Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the Connections Between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College- and University-Based Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99. doi: 10.1177/0022487109347671

Author Information

Zulaikha Mohamad (presenting / submitting)
Ghent University
Department of Educational Studies
Ghent
Ghent University, Belgium
Ghent University, Belgium

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.