Testing and Enhancing Work and Family Reconciliation Model
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

32 SES 11 B, Organizing Family: Work-family Conflicts and Professional Support

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-25
17:15-18:45
Room:
OB-E0.01
Chair:
Andreas Schröer

Contribution

Contemporary young families with young children experience tension trying to reconcile family and work requirements. Due to the fact that both institutes of family and work are greedy institutions (Coser, 1974) and tend to require maximum efforts and commitment from working parents. Starting a family with children requires redistribution of time, tasks and commitments for parents seeking to continue their work career that comes at conflict with the family responsibilities. The problem of the research is related to the need for a model for family and work reconciliation. Scientific literature survey has revealed the three major strains that interract in the process of individuals managing their work and family responsibilities: they experience conflict (Parasuraman&Greenhouse, 2002) when trying to meet the requirements of their work-place and family; the experience of both faculties – family and work not only generate conflict, but also facilitation (Crouter,1984; Frone, 2003; Hill, 2005) – being a good professional adds skills for succesful family life and vice versa - being a good mother/father adds skills and qualities for a professional role at work; the different roles that women and men hold and are culturally expected to perform in their family and professional lives (Konrad, Mangel, 2000; Scott, 2001; Hill et al, 2003). The possibilities to reconcile work and family life depend on a number of internal (e.g., number of children in the family, their age, etc.) and external factors (e.g., employers, political aspects, etc.). Therefore,  young families with children need  support on several levels: on individual, institutional and state levels. The mentioned factors may contribute to the theoretical model of family and career reconciliation.

The most theoretical models in literature review contain the following components: (1) a set of work and family domain, (2) a combination of work domain, family domain and life outcomes,  (3) work and family conflict construct, (4) work role/family role construct ( Michael et al, 2009). Agryee at al (1999) emphasize the importance of job and family stressors (work presure, lack of aotonomy, ambiguity of work and family roles, parents‘ workloads, child-care arrangements) and relate them to work and family conflict and role conflict.

The theoretical model was enriched by the data of the three-stage quantitative research (in Lithuania, in 2015): (1) 15 narratives with young families with children, (2) 12 interviews with employers and (3) a focus group interview with career counsellors. Theory analysis and qualitative research data has allowed building a survey questionnaire that finalizes this several-staged research project seeking to prepare a model of family and work reconciliation. The goal of this paper is to test a family and work reconciliation model in a quantitative way. The research question of this paper is what are the main aspects that contribute to the family and work reconciliation model?

The financial support provided by the Research Council of Lithuania for the research is gratefully acknowledged (Project Reg. No. MIP-075/2014).

Method

Paper presentation is based on the theoretical literature analysis that has lead to the creation of a theoretical young family and work reconciliation model. The theoretical model has been enhanced by the data received from a three-staged qualitative research. Qualitative data of narratives (a story of a young family) was analyzed using narrative themes categories, semi-structured interviews (employers) and focus group interview (career counsellors and HR specialists) were analyzed using content analysis that has led to evolving of categories and subcategories, while these contributed to the enhancement of the theoretical model. The quantitative survey questionnaire has been constructed according to the segments of the theoretical family and work reconciliation model. The online survey will be distributed to 200 respondents – young parents (men and women) with children under 12. The survey data will be analyzed using statistical analysis methods. The results will be presented using statistically significant survey data including such variables as, e.g., sex.

Expected Outcomes

It is expected that the theoretical family and work reconciliation model depends on the three major istrains of conflict, role and facilitation. It is expected that the role of internal factors, such as conflict between a wife and a husband, inner professional/parent identity conflict, the division of tasks and responsibilities in the family, the role of extended family will be further revealed. The results of the survey will allow to further elaborate on the role of external factors that include the importance of flexible return to work options (part time work, flexible working hours, possibility to work from home), family-friendly work place, organizational culture, equal rights for young parents and social security. The survey data will also allow to reveal the importance of support on institutional and state levels in terms of legal security, availability of information and counselling. The results of the survey will contribute to the model of family and work reconciliation.

References

Agryee, S., Felds, D.&Luk, V. (1999). A cross-cultural test of model of the work-family interface. Journal of Management, 25, 491-511. Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work family interface. Human Relations, 37(6), 425–442. Coser, L., A. (1974). Greedy Institutions. Patterns of Undivided Commitment. The Free Press: New York. Frone, M., Russell, M. & Barnes, G. (2003). Work-family balance. In J. Quick & L. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational psychology, Washington: American Psychological Association, 143-162. Hill, E. J., Martinson, V., Hawkins, A. &Ferris, M. (2003). Studying “working fathers”: Comparing father’s and mother’s work-family conflict, fit, and adaptive strategies in a global high-tech company. Fathering, I, 239-261. Hill, E., J. (2005). Work-Family Facilitation and Conflict, Working Fathers and Mothers, Work-Family Stressors and Support. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 793. Konrad, A. M.& Mangel, R. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (12),1225-1237. Michael J.S., Mitchelson J., K., Kotrba L., M., LeBreton J., M.&Baltes B., B. (2009). A comporative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of work-family linkages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 199-218. Parasuraman, S.&Greenhouse, J.H. (2002). Toward reducing some critical gaps in work-family research. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 299-312. Scott, D. B. (2001). The costs and benefits of women’s family ties in occupational context: Women in corporate-government affairs management. Community, Work and Family, 4 (1), 4-27.

Author Information

Elena Trepule (presenting / submitting)
Vytautas Magnus University
Kauno r.
Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.