Session Information
27 SES 14 A, From Design to Practice in School Environments (Part 2)
Symposium continued from 27 SES 13 A
Contribution
In this paper we set out to explore how the physical, social and conceived conditions in schools can facilitate or disrupt support work aimed at improving student learning and preventing social exclusion (cf. Frelin & Grannäs, 2013). This is accomplished by comparing student support practices in the common areas of two newly renovated secondary schools built in two different time periods. The focus is on teachers’ and other school staff’s enactment of curriculum and policy reforms in their endeavours to improve students’ learning conditions and well-being (cf. Ball, Maguire, & Braun, 2012; Mulcahy, 2016). This enactment takes place in a designed school environment, where teachers and support staff appropriate spaces for educational purposes in different ways (cf. Stables, 2015). The interview and observational data come from two qualitative case studies, one complete (2012-14) and one ongoing (2015-16), using a spatial analysis perspective. Physical, social and conceived aspects of space are considered (Frelin & Grannäs, 2014, 2015). The case schools, located in two municipalities, were originally built in the 1910s (Lönnhaga) and the 1960s (Tallvik). Both schools serve mixed to low SES communities and have organized student support functions in the schools’ corridors, cafeterias, recreation areas and other common spaces. These functions are for example school host, student coach and student welfare officer. The organization, function and physical layout of the schools differ and represent the pedagogical and architectural ideas of the periods in which they were built. Preliminary results show variations in the physical conditions for support work in terms of number of storeys, transparency (e.g. stone or glass walls) and layout (enclosed or open spaces), how the staff respond to these conditions (e.g. stationary in offices or mobile in corridors) and the kind of contact staff have with the management (e.g. whether or not they are used as substitute teachers). In contrast, the task perception among the support staff as a whole is similar in both schools. It is interesting to see how the staff respond creatively to the physical school environments, designed in different time periods and rebuilt in response to policy reform, in order to carry out their tasks (cf. Blackmore et al, 2011; Mulcahy, 2016; Stables, 2015).
References
Ball, Stephen J, Maguire, Meg, & Braun, Annette. (2012). How schools do policy: policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge. Blackmore, Jill, Bateman, Debra, Loughlin, Jill, O’Mara, Joanne, & Aranda, George. (2011). Research into the Connection between Built Learning Spaces and Student Outcomes: Literature Review Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/about/programs/infrastructure/blackmorelearningspaces.pdf Frelin, Anneli, & Grannäs, Jan. (2013). Results and accountability - Marginalization of the educational interpersonal space. Paper presented at the ECCS conference, Braga, Portugal Frelin, Anneli, & Grannäs, Jan. (2014). Studying relational spaces in secondary school. Applying a spatial framework for the study of borderlands and relational work in school improvement processes. Improving schools, 17(2), 1-13. Frelin, Anneli, & Grannäs, Jan. (2015). Direct and indirect educational relationships. Developing a typology for the contribution of different categories of school staff in relation to students' educational experience. Improving schools, 18(1), 56-68. Mulcahy, Dianne. (2016). Policy matters: de/re/territorialising spaces of learning in Victorian government schools. Journal of Education Policy, 31(1), 81-97. Stables, Andrew. (2015). The semiotics of organisational landscape. School as design. In Andrew Stables & Inna Semetsky (Eds.), Edusemiotics. Semiotic philosophy as educational foundation. New York: Routledge.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.