Session Information
27 SES 07 A, Varieties of Conceptions of Ethical Competence Displayed in Pupils’ Responses to National Tests in Ethics
Symposium
Contribution
In the Swedish syllabus for RE, ethics is one of the parts of the core content which has to be studied. Within this part, it is prescribed for year 9 that “analysis and argumentation based on ethical models, such as consequential and deontological ethics” is to be highlighted, and that pupils’ ability to “use ethical concepts and models” is to be assessed with regard to criteria representing various grades from E to A. This part of the core content and the knowledge requirements focuses on an analytical dimension of what may be described as “ethical competence”. In the Swedish National Test 2013, this specific dimension was tested by using an item where the pupils were asked to “reason about and give arguments for and against” the death penalty. According to the instructions, the answers should involve reflections on “intentional ethics”, “consequentialist ethics” and “deontological ethics” respectively. An analysis of the empirical material consisting of a sample of pupils’ answers, brings three research questions to the fore: 1.What is the reason that many pupils, when expressing ideas regarding a consequentialist approach, present more or less simplified apprehensions of what characterizes such an approach? 2. Why is it that pupils seem to think that a consequentialist position in ethics implies rather straightforward standpoints? 3. On what grounds do several of the pupils seem to presuppose that a consequentialist approach has to be understood in terms of a utilitarian position? There seems to be a need to introduce relevant philosophical perspectives in the national test context. One theorist who could contribute to a more comprehensive analysis of both the syllabus and of the pupils’ answers regarding the three “ethical models” is the Australian moral philosopher Peter Singer. His approach is founded on “the basic principle of equality”, which, according to Singer, does not prescribe equal treatment but equal consideration, regardless of the species of the subjects who are the focus of moral reflection and ethical analysis. Singer’s utilitarian approach could, with the aid of concepts such as personism, preference and cognitive dissonance, contribute analytical tools, the use of which could pave the way for an understanding of the syllabus as well as the pupils’ answers.
References
Lgr 11 [Eng], (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011. Retrieved April 8th, 2015, from http://www.skolverket.se/laroplaner-amnen-och-kurser/ grundskoleutbildning/grundskola/engelska Singer, P. (2015). The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically. Yale University Press. Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Singer, P. (1997). How Are We to Live? Ethics in an Age of Self-interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.