Session Information
27 SES 05 C, Innovative Approaches to Learning and Teaching
Paper Session
Contribution
Concept cartoons were discovered in 1992 by Keogh and Naylor. In its early days of use, it has developed and passed through many stages. The draft concept cartoons predecessor contained only one character and one misconception, which was challenging for the students. After this point, it was decided to add multiple characters' dialogues and conceptual misconceptions to the cartoons. Dialogues have created opportunities for alternative, acceptable viewpoints and ideas to emerge (Keogh and Naylor, 1999).
Concept cartoons are designed to be drawing, cartoon-like, stimulating against a question, able to create arguments and produce scientific knowledge (Long ve Marson, 2003) and they are "cognitive drawings" or "visual disagreements" that use cartoon-like drawings. Concept cartoons are more effective when applied to mixed talented student groups (Dabell, 2008). Many researchers (Özüredi, 2009; Eroğlu, 2010; Evrekli and Balım 2010; Dereli, 2008; Balım and others, 2008; Özalp, 2006; Burhan, 2008; Ayyıldız 2010; Tokcan and Alkan 2010; Özün Kılıç, 2010; Erdağ, 2011) has increased academic success in teaching.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of concept cartoon usage on students’ academic performance in the context of ‘structure of matter’ theme. In addition to that, students’ views about concept cartoons were analyzed.
Research questions of this study;
1. Is there a statistically significant difference between the achievement pre-test scores of the students in the experimental and control group in the " Structure of Matter" unit?
2. Is there a statistically significant difference between the achievement post-test scores of the students in the experimental group and the control group?
3. What are the views of students in the experimental group on teaching using the concept cartoons?
According to the results of the study, it can be stated that the teaching of concept cartoons is more effective in increasing academic achievement than the current program. It is important to visualize the subjects in the teaching of the science course, which is one of the lessons of learning difficulty. At the same time, concept cartoons seem to be important in terms of attracting attention to important concepts of the subject and providing perseverance in learning concepts.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Ayyıldız, N. (2010). Coğrafya Öğretiminde Karikatür Materyali Kullanımının Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences Balım, G. A., İnel, D. and Evrekli, E. (2008). Fen Öğretiminde Kavram Karikatürü Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarına ve Sorgulayıcı Öğrenme Becerileri Algılarına Etkisi. Elemantary Education Online, 7(1), 188-202. Burhan, Y. (2008). Asit ve Baz Kavramlarına Yönelik Karikatür Destekli Çalışma Yapraklarının Geliştirilmesi ve Uygulanması. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Karadeniz Teknik University, , Institute of Natural Sciences. Dereli, M. (2008). Tam Sayılar Konusunun Karikatürle Öğretiminin Öğrencilerin Matematik Başarılarına Etkisi. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences Dabell, J. (2008). Using Concept Cartoons. Mathematics Teaching Incorporating Micromath 209, 34-46. Erdağ, S. (2011). İlköğretim 5. Sınıf Matematik Dersinde Kavram Karikatürleri İle Destekli Matematik Öğretiminin, Ondalık Kesirler Konusundaki Akademik Başarıya ve Kalıcılığa Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Eroğlu, N. (2010). 6.Sınıf Maddenin Tanecikli Yapısı Ünitesindeki Kavramların Öğretiminde Öğrenci Ürünü Karikatürlerin Kullanımı. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Sakarya University, , Institute of Natural Sciences. Evrekli, E. and Balım, A. G. (2010). Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretiminde Zihin Haritası Ve Kavram Karikatürü Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarına Ve Sorgulayıcı Öğrenme Becerileri Algılarına Etkisi. Western Anatolia Journal Of Educational Sciences, 1,2, 76-98. Karasar, N. (1999). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık Keogh, B. and Naylor, S. (1999). Concept Cartoons, Teaching and Learning in Science: An Evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 431-466. Long, S. ve Marson, K. (2003). Concept Cartoons. Hands on Science. 19(3). Özalp, I. (2006). Karikatür Tekniğinin Fen ve Çevre Eğitimde Kullanılabilirliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Celal Bayar University, , Institute of Natural Sciences. Özün Kılıç, S. (2010). Hayat Bilgisi Öğretiminde Kavram Karikatürü Yaklaşımının Öğrenci Başarısı ve Tutumuna Etkisi. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi, Institute of Social Sciences. Özüredi, Ö. (2009). Kavram Karikatürlerinin İlköğretim 7. Sınıf Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi, İnsan ve Çevre Ünitesinde Yer Alan “Besin Zinciri” Konusunda Öğrenci Başarısı Üzerindeki Etkisi. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Celal Bayar University, , Institute of Natural Sciences. Tokcan, H. and Alkan, G. (2013). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretiminde Kavram Karikatürlerinin Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 14(2), 1-19.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.