Right to Be Active? Exploring the Sport/Physical Activity Experiences of Children in Care
Conference:
ECER 2017
Network:
Format:
Paper (Copy for Joint Session)

Session Information

19 SES 09 C JS, The Practice of Inclusion in Physical Activity Settings

Joint Paper Session NW 18 and NW 19

Time:
2017-08-24
13:30-15:00
Room:
K3.23
Chair:

Contribution

Looked-after children is the legislative term in England for all children and young people who are removed from their natural family setting and are cared for by a local authority. In 2016 there were around 70,440 looked-after children in the care of local authorities in England; 74% (51,850) living in foster-care and 11% (7,600) in secure residential settings (DfE, 2016). Internationally, this population of children may also be referred to as children in care, care-experienced children, children looked-after or youth in residential/foster care. Despite this linguistic variation across nations, much international literature surrounding this group of young people holds relevance across countries, due to the greater need and vulnerability of this population of children (Sempik et al., 2008). Research from the UK and beyond suggests that there have been recent increases in the number of looked-after children (DfE, 2016). It has also been argued that the refugee crisis that has unfolded across the European Union over the past 18 months has played a role within this, with many unaccompanied migrants entering care systems (EU Committee, 2016). Certainly in the UK, the number of looked after unaccompanied asylum seeking children increased by 54% in 2016 to 4,210. Research with/for this population of young people is therefore timely.

 

As one of the most disadvantaged groups in society, looked-after children are seen as being at risk of a range of adverse social, educational and health outcomes (Sempik et al. 2008). Within the UK and beyond, concerns abound regarding the systematic underachievement of this group and effort has been directed at narrowing the ‘outcomes gap’ by promoting involvement in activities that support physical, social and psychological development. Drawing on research pointing to the potential for sport/physical activity (PA) to act as a vehicle for facilitating young people’s positive development (e.g. Holt, 2008) we argue that sport/PA could play an important role here. Within the UK it has been argued that looked-after children should have access “equal to their peers”’ in this respect (DfES, 2010 p.10). Recent research also contends that sport/PA can be integral to the development of social capital, resilience and identity for looked-after children, as well as contributing to emotional, mental and physical health (Hollingworth, 2012). Paradoxically, however, research also highlights the piecemeal provision of sport/PA for looked-after children at local levels and shows that many are unable to access activities despite their desire to do so (Murray, 2012).

 

Relatively few studies have considered the role of sport/PA in the lives of looked-after children, although some studies within and outside of the UK have provided a more generalised account of leisure provision (e.g. Safvenbom & Sarndahl, 2000) or extra-curricular activities (e.g. Farineau & McWey, 2011). A recent literature review also noted the domination of adult voices in the few studies identified (Quarmby & Pickering, 2016). It is argued, therefore, that there lacks a body of work that engages looked-after children in exploring their relationships with sport/PA and that they represent a ‘hidden group’ in relation to research, policy and practice (Quarmby, 2014). This paper draws together data from three UK-based research projects that have each sought, in part, to address this issue. Whilst three separate initiatives, all have shared the key objective of privileging the voices of care-experienced youth (both those currently in care and care leavers) alongside those who work with/for them, in order to understand more about their broad social experiences and their attitudes towards, engagements with and development through sport/PA. A Bourdieuian framework is proposed to help understand the complex social realities of this youth population (e.g. Bourdieu, 1985).

Method

Three different projects are drawn upon in this discussion. Project 1 is an ongoing research-council funded study concerned with examining the sport/PA experiences of looked-after children in England. Project 2 is a doctoral study which relates to the first project but is focused more specifically on the physical education and school sport experiences of looked-after children. Finally, Project 3 is a small-scale study funded by a UK-based charity that works with children in care/care leavers and focused on exploring care-experienced young people’s views of stigma and care. Reflecting the recognised difficulties in gaining access to looked-after children (Quarmby, 2014) and acknowledged value of centralising youth voices in research with vulnerable groups (Sandford et al., 2010) the projects drawn on in this discussion all share qualitative, participatory approaches. In short, they each employ multiple research methods to explore the views and experiences of care experienced young people (both those currently in care and care leavers) as well as (in two projects) adults with responsibility for looked-after children. Importantly, all three projects are underpinned by a youth voice perspective. A recent review of research contexts focused on the experiences of looked-after children reported a consistent finding of the differences between children and adults in their understanding and prioritising of key issues; emphasising the need for youth voice within research with this population, since young people can provide different perspectives from carers, practitioners and policy makers (Holland, 2009). A large body of literature also highlights the importance of making space for youth voice in research (e.g. Heath et al., 2009) although there are acknowledged difficulties and ethical challenges in accessing authentic voices of marginalised or vulnerable groups of young people (Sandford et al., 2010). In summary, data presented within this discussion have been generated through various methods, including online surveys (including a combination of Likert-scale and open-answer questions) as well as semi-structured individual interviews and focus group discussions. In all three studies, a range of innovative, activity based tasks (e.g. mapping, graffiti boards, photo-elicitation) were also drawn upon within the focus group discussions to help encourage debate/discussion, facilitate the collation of relevant data and offer opportunities for participants to guide the research agenda (e.g., Enright and O’Sullivan, 2012). In each case, data were collated and analysed thematically to draw out key issues and concepts using a constructivist grounded theory approach (e.g. Harry et al., 2005).

Expected Outcomes

The projects outlined in this discussion provide some insight into looked-after children’s attitudes towards, access to and engagements with sport/PA. In many respects, they reinforce findings from research with broader youth cohorts in identifying the importance of social processes within sport/PA and the potential of sport/PA to facilitate the development of, among other things, physical ability, self-confidence and various life skills (Holt, 2008). They also point to recognised, specific challenges that care-experienced young people have in accessing/engaging with sport/PA, particularly with regard to financial resources, logistic difficulties and the disruption of shifting care contexts (Murray, 2012). Importantly, the research projects emphasise the variety of experiences among care-experienced youth, highlighting the diverse nature of this population and emphasising the need for tailored, specific approaches in policy and practice. In addition to these findings, it is argued that the projects outlined here can serve to shed some light on the complex social realities of looked-after children. Drawing on a Bourdieuian perspective (e.g. Bourdieu, 1985) we propose that lives of these young people, like those of their peers, are shaped by their engagements with various social fields. However, unlike many of their peers, care-experienced youth do not always have consistent or reliable networks/connections (social capital) to support sustained engagement in sport/PA. Recent research points to the impact of children’s lived experience in determining their perceptions towards, access to and patterns of engagement with sport and physical activity and, moreover, in relation to their negotiation and construction of identity (Sandford, in press). The projects presented here can therefore potentially add to understanding in this area and emphasise the need for future research to focus more on the wider social contexts of care-experienced young people in order to better understand their attitudes towards and engagements with sport/PA.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1985) The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723-744. DfES (2007) Care Matters: Time for Change, London, Department for Education and Skills. DfE (2016) Children looked after in England (including adoption) year ending 31 March 2016. London, Department for Education. Enright, E. & O’Sullivan, M. (2010) Can I do it in my Pyjamas?: Negotiating a Physical Education Curriculum with Teenage Girls. European Physical Education Review, 16(3): 203–222. European Union Committee (2016) Children in crisis: unaccompanied migrant children in the EU. 2nd Report of Session 2016-17, HL Paper 34. Farineau, H. & McWey, L. (2011). The relationship between extracurricular activities and delinquency of adolescents in foster care, Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 963-968. Harry, B., Sturges, K.M., & Klingner, J.K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2) 3-13. Heath, S., Brooke, R., Cleaver, E. & Ireland, E. (2009) Researching young people’s lives. London, Sage. Holland, S. (2009). Listening to Children in Care: A Review of Methodological and Theoretical Approaches to Understanding Looked-After Children’s Perspectives, Children and Society, 23, 226-235. Hollingworth, K. (2012). Participation in social, leisure and informal learning activities among care leavers in England: Positive outcomes for educational participation. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 438–447. Holt, N. (2008) Positive Youth Development through Sport. London, Routledge. Quarmby, T. (2014). Sport and physical activity in the lives of looked-after children, Sport, Education and Society. 19(7), 944-958 Quarmby, T. & Pickering, K. (2016) Physical Activity and Children in Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Policy for Disadvantaged Youth. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 13(7), 780-787. Safvenbom, R. & Samdahl, D. (2000). Leisure for youth in residential care: an important context for intervention, International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 120-127. Sandford, R., Armour, K. & Duncombe, R. (2010) Finding their voice: disaffected youth insights on sport/physical activity interventions. In, M. O’Sullivan & A. MacPhail (Eds) Young people’s voices in physical education and youth sport (pp.65-87). London: Routledge. Sandford, R.A. (in press) ‘I’m Many Different People’: Examining the Influence of space and place on girls’ constructions of embodied identities, in, H. Cawood & S. Thomsen (Eds.), Space Place and Cultural Identity, Inter-Disciplinary Press. Sempik, J., Ward, H. & Darker, I. (2008). Emotional and behavioural difficulties of children and young people at entry into care, Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13(2), 221-233.

Author Information

Rachel Sandford (presenting / submitting)
Loughborough University, United Kingdom
Leeds Beckett University, United Kingdom
Loughborough University, United Kingdom
Loughborough University, United Kingdom
Become Charity, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.