Session Information
32 SES 06 A, Knowledge Mobilization: Connecting Research and Practice
Symposium
Contribution
An enduring challenge of educational improvement is the ways in which valuable knowledge is identified and spread across education systems. This challenge of what has come to be known as knowledge mobilization (Moss, 2013), requires clarification of assumptions in at least two complex domains: (a) what is conceived of as the knowledge of value, and; (b) how we view individual and organization knowledge acquisition and transmission. Both of these domains are intricately tied into the social systems, structures and cultures within which these processes unfold.
Epistemology, or the nature of knowledge, can be viewed from many perspectives, and has direct bearing on how we conceive and construct systems for knowledge mobilization (Alavi & Leidner, 2001). For example, if we view knowledge as a tangible entity that can be codified and transferred, this might lead to the development of a knowledge management system (Vera & Crossnan, 2003). By contrast, if we conceive of knowledge as a process of coming to know something (Nonaka & Von Krogh, 2009), then this emphasizes the social interactions that contribute to knowledge development. The point here is not to categorize all the different definitions of knowledge, but to point out that how knowledge is conceived has great bearing on how one views knowledge mobilization.
Theories of both individual and organizational learning also underlie efforts at knowledge mobilization. At the individual level, contemporary learning theorists conceive of learning as a socially constructed experience produced through ongoing interactions with both the social and cultural environments surrounding the learner (Vygotsky, 1978; Lave, 1988). While this theory expands upon constructivist perspectives (Piaget, 1970; Anderson & Smith, 1987), it is distinct from earlier dominant, yet outmoded, conceptions of behaviorism, in which skills are developed through repetitive drills and extrinsic motivations (Skinner, 1974). Learning within social organizations is sometimes conceived of as the aggregation of individual learning (Argyris & Schon, 1978), while others theorize organizational learning as the development of systems to collect, synthesize, and disseminate knowledge that is valuable to organizational members (Daft & Weick, 1984; Kim, 1993). Alternatively, others view organizational learning in more cultural terms, whereby knowledge is sharedvia communal interaction amongst organizational members around professional practice (Brown & Duiguid, 1991; Wenger, 1998).
References
Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. Argyris, C. & Schon, D.A. (1978) Organizational learning Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Brown, J.S. & Duguid, B. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57. Daft, R.L. & Weick, K.E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295. Lave, J. (1988). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. Resnick, S. Levine, and L. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives of socially shared cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Moss, G. (2013). Research, policy and knowledge flows in education: what counts in knowledge mobilisation?. Contemporary Social Science, 8(3), 237-248. Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization science, 20(3), 635-652. Vera, D. & Crossnan, M. (2003). Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative framework. In M. Easterby-Smith and M. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 122-141. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.