This paper examines the origins of Soviet style university administration, and the reverberations of its practices in the global context of higher education. While the Soviet managerialism of the 20th century differs from its successor, 21st century neoliberal managerialism, features that are common to them, including corporate surveillance, ideological hegemony, and freedom suppression, find fertile ground in societies and universities that are prone to an authoritarian style of governance. In post-Soviet contexts, managerialism has unique cultural characteristics that combine colonial and anti-intellectual legacies, making it particularly appealing to corporate powers cultivating the norms of exploitative capitalism in academia. Critical inquiry into university transformations spearheaded by the Soviet characteristics of managerialism is sorely lacking. This paper calls for rethinking the cultural and political legacies of higher learning in a world challenged by undemocratic and revanchist forces.

Hanson, M., & Sokhey, S. W. (2021). Higher education as an authoritarian tool for regime survival: Evidence from Kazakhstan and around the world. Problems of Post-Communism, 68(3), 231-246. Hayden, M. and Thiep, L.Q. (2007). Institutional autonomy for higher education in Vietnam. Higher Education Research & Development 26 (1), 73-85. Heyneman, S. (1998). The transition from party/state to open democracy: The role of education. International Journal of Educational Development 18 (1), 21-40. Hladchenko, M., de Boer, H. and Westerheijden, D. (2016). Establishing research universities in Ukrainian Higher Education: The incomplete journey of a structural reform. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 38 (2): 111-125.