Session Information
26 SES 16 A, School Leadership Success amidst Contemporary Complexities and Layers of Influence on Education (Part 2)
Symposium continued from 26 SES 14 A
Contribution
This case explores the creation of a Catholic primary school in Melbourne, Australia; Patron Saint Catholic Primary School (PSCPS). The founding principal has led the creation of a recontextualised Catholic primary school over a ten-year period. This is the principal’s second principalship, having previously served for six years in a more challenging inner-city Catholic primary school. The study draws upon individual interviews with the principal (three interviews), Parish Priest, Religious Education Leader, Deputy Principal, level leaders (year 5-6, year 3-4, foundation to year 2 (two leaders) and two specialist leaders), six teachers, two group interviews each with four parents and two group interviews each with four students from years 5/6, observation of the life of the school, document analysis and a teacher survey. The case shows: • How the prinicpal’s background, education, personal philosophy and personal dispositions and characteristics that helped form his identity as a leader. • The development of the school was framed by the principal’s pedagogical leadership of 21st Century Learning and the underpinning of the school by establishing a sustainable professional learning community and a creation of a contemporary Catholic school environment with a religious identity for the school. • The principal’s ability to build the capacity of teachers and lead in and from the middle highlighted the distributive approach to his leadership. • The principal was able to navigate the various levels of context and meet and overcome the internal and external challenges. His approach and decision making were firmly based on evidence-based research. We conclude by showing how his leadership maps onto a model of successful school leadership developed from previous ISSPP cases.
References
Authors, 2021. Author, 2020a Author, 2020b Author (2018). Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press. Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity theory and the social sciences: The state of the art. Routledge. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of mixed methods research, 6(2), 80-88. Haggis, T. (2008). ‘Knowledge Must Be Contextual’: Some possible implications of complexity and dynamic systems theories for educational research. Educational philosophy and theory, 40(1), 158-176. Morrison, K. (2010). Complexity theory, school leadership and management: Questions for theory and practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(3), 374- 393. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Rethinking schooling (pp. 208-242). Routledge.
Update Modus of this Database
The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.