Teachers and Morality: The General Teaching Council of England Code of Conduct and Practice and Trainee-Teachers.
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 08 B, Research on Values, Beliefs & Understandings in Teacher Education

Paper Session

Time:
2010-08-26
17:15-18:45
Room:
AUDITORIUM XII, Päärakennus / Main Building
Chair:
Maria Alfredo Moreira

Contribution

This is the first of two linked papers on the development of codes of professional conduct for teachers. Both papers are located within the context of the English education system but seek to examine parallels with pan – European approaches to perspectives on professional conduct within teacher education. In 2009, the General Teaching Council (GTC) for England introduced a revised Code of Conduct and Practice (CoCP, 2009) for registered teachers. Whilst this code is clearly designed to enhance professionalism, which has been described as the “predominant leitmotif for European teacher education” (Weiner, 2002) it attempts to do so by defining a series of rules and prescriptions designed to determine and homogenise the way in which practising teachers perform their role. Through exploring the moral and ethical values (explicit and implicit) of the CoCP, and through discussion of the manner in which trainee-teachers are required to sign-up to the code, it will be suggested that such codes may be usefully seen as offering the opportunity for teacher educators to introduce student teachers to notions of rights, principles, goals and the telos of teaching. Given that the European Commission have advocated that “European common references and principles in a number of areas, including the competences and qualifications of teachers and trainers, should be developed ‘as a matter of priority’ (2008 p.28.) It is intended that a contextualised case study of this nature be used as a starting point for debate with teacher educators from across Europe. As such, this paper will explore the background and media reaction to the revised CoCP in England and offer a critique of the eight principles to which teachers are bound by the Code before inviting audience members from other European nations, and beyond, to share their own thoughts and experiences of similar codes of conduct and practice.

Method

In order to theoretically frame the discussion, the historical and ethical philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre will be used to reveal the inherent moral tensions at play between the CoCP, practicing teachers, and the cultural and political context in which both exist. In particular this paper seeks to offer a Virtue Ethics approach to teacher development. Instead of placing most emphasis on a set of rules and principles abstracted from the individual moral agent, virtue ethics focuses on the development of the character of the individual. In other words, it does not ask individuals to refer to a code when they are seeking to discover what they ought to do in a given situation; rather, it seeks to assist the individual in developing their character so that they become the type of person, through the habituation of deliberation and virtuous acts, who will make the virtuous decision in all situations

Expected Outcomes

This paper concludes that the outcome of the moral confusion within the Code is a profession characterised by inherent moral and ethical contradictions that potentially impact upon the identity of teachers-as-professionals in a negative and, perhaps, professionally paralysing fashion. Nevertheless, we would suggest that such contradictions offer the teacher educator an opportunity for authentic ethical deliberation on the telos of teaching and, as such, presents a powerful learning object for initial teacher education.

References

European Commission (2008) Joint European Council / Commission report on the implementation of the Education and Training 2010 work programme. Brussels: Council of the European Union MacIntyre, A (2007) After Virtue (3rd Edition) University of Notre Dame Press: Notre dame, Indiana Weiner, G (2002) ‘Uniquely similar or similarly unique? Education and development of teachers in Europe’. Teaching Education. 13(3) pp. 273-288

Author Information

Edge Hill University
Faculty of Education
Ormskirk
Edge Hill University
Faculty of Education
Chorley
University of Manchester
University of Manchester

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.