Students’ Understanding of Scientific Models: A Modern Physics Course Case
Conference:
ECER 2010
Format:
Poster

Session Information

MC_Poster, Poster Session Main Conference

Main Conference Poster Session

Time:
2010-08-27
12:15-13:15
Room:
2nd Floor Hall (M.B)/ II KRS AULA, Päärakennus / Main Building,
Chair:

Contribution

Models are important elements to explain scientific ideas. Many physical objects, interactions, systems and processes can be modeled [1]. Students’ understanding of models is important for their understanding of physics concepts, since they are surrogate objects, conceptual representations of real things [2]. There are some studies about how students’ understand scientific models [3, 4, 5]. Mathematical model, visual model, concrete model etc. are some kinds of models which are used in science lessons. In addition, there are some models in individual’s cognition, which are called mental models.

In this study, a modern physics course at the department of physics, at a university, in Turkey, was examined during an academic semester.

The research questions of this study are:

1. How do the students undertstand models?

2. What are the characteristics of models in the model explanations and given examples from modern physics topics?

3. Is there a difference between male and female students in understanding of models?

4. Is there a difference between physics and physics education students in understanding of models?

 

 

Method

This study includes mixed methodologies for the research. One of the instruments of data collection is “Students’ Understanding of Models in Science” questionnaire. The questionnaire, which is already developped by the other researchers [5] was implemented to Modern Physics course students at the end of the academic semester. In addition to 27 Likert-type items in the questionnaire, students were wanted to explain scientific models and give examples by considering the modern physics course. In order to get deep information about their understanding of models, more than 20 students were selected purposively among the students who completed the questionnaire, and almost 20-minute semi-structured interviews were conducted with them about models and models from modern physics topics.

Expected Outcomes

Quantitative data were examined in terms of different variables by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences programme, and whether the students’ understanding of models change or not due to these variables was examined. In the qualitative analysis of the data, the categories which clarify students' conceptions about models and examples to models from modern physics topics were obtained. After the independent analyses of the quantitative and qualitative data, the results were examined to explain students’ understanding of models by comparison. The results of the study showed although students meet scientific models in physics, they have difficulty in recognizing and interpreting them in terms of physical events.

References

[1] Etkina, E., Warren, A., & Gentile, M. (2006). The role of models in physics instruction. The Physics Teacher, 44(1), 34-39. [2] Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440-454. [3] Frederiksen, J. R., White, B. Y., & Gutwill, J. (1999). Dynamic mental models in l earning science: The importance of constructing derivational linkages among models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 806–836. [4] Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352- 381. [5] Treagust D. F., Chittleborough G., & Mamiala T. L. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357-368.

Author Information

MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION
ANKARA
Middle East Technical University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.